Skip to main content

Women Power




There should be no difference whatever between man and woman when it comes to dignity.  Both are the same species.  Both are required to reproduce the species if nature’s rules are respected. They are counterparts of each other.  The concept of Ardhanarishvara in Hinduism eloquently illustrates the quintessentially complementary nature of man and woman.  

Yet women have been suppressed and oppressed in most parts of the world for a very long period of history.  The morning prayer of the Jewish men may be the most blatant outrage perpetrated on women theologically.  “Thank you, Lord, for not making me a woman,” the man prays every morning.  The woman is the cause of the human sinfulness, according to the Old Testament which is sacred to both the Jews and the Christians.  There is no female Rabbi in Judaism and there is no female priest in Christianity, though the discrimination is slowly relenting.

Islam is worse than its two Semitic predecessors when it comes to women’s rights.  Sexism becomes mathematically established in Islam.  “The male shall have the equal of the portion of two females,” says Quran 4:11.  When it comes to bearing witness in the court also, one man is equal to two women in that religion (Quran 2:28).  The Hadith and Al-sira are thoroughly soaked in male chauvinism.

We are very familiar with what Hinduism did with its widows.  The system of Sati was more inhuman than all the sexist oppressions and suppressions perpetrated by the Semitic religions.  Even today the purdah continues to veil many female faces in rural North India.  In spite of such wonderful concepts as Ardhanarishvara and Durga, women were flagrantly oppressed in Hinduism.  Manusmriti, for example, subjugated the woman to the father when she was a girl, to the husband when she was a woman and to the son when might be a widow.  But the same text also very contradictorily suggests that “where women are revered, there the gods rejoice; but where they are not, no sacred rite bears any fruit.”  Hinduism had highly ambivalent attitudes towards women like many other things.

These are just some examples of how religions were highly sexist.  And religions shape people's attitudes to a very great extent. 

Religions took a backseat in the 20th century.  Consequently women began to find emancipation.  Today we speak about empowerment of women, not just emancipation.  It’s a great change.  Women are no less than men in any way.  Given the right opportunities they will perform as well as men in any field.  Women’s empowerment is precisely about giving them equal opportunities and rights.  However, we find India still grappling with obscurantist and obsolete notions regarding women. 

There is a lot of contradictoriness in our attitudes towards women.  Maybe, it’s part of our very culture and tradition.  We should resolve those contradictions and bring about a society which puts women on the same platform as men.  That’s the real empowerment of women.

PS. Written for Indispire Edition 168. #womenempowerment


Comments

  1. Every religion misinterprets its scriptures to subjugate women. Sometimes they don't even have to misinterpret - as you have pointed out with your examples. Patriarchy is rampant and insidious.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Her empowerment will be established when she will be able to walk alone without the fear of getting raped.

    I am happy with the exemplary judgment given by the SC against the nirbhaya case.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I too welcomed the judgement. In matters such as this I don't endorse the human rights activists. Harsh actions are necessary sometimes for the sake of humanity.

      Delete
  3. The real question is why there's a need to suppress women, and the answer is they are really powerful. In all animal kingdom, if you see, you'll find females are powerful than their male counterparts.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That's true. Women are suppressed because they are indeed powerful. Perhaps they will outshine men and men don't want that.

      Delete
  4. Yes, the mindset of people need to change. Women have suffered and been discriminated in all societies.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Women are coming to the forefront now. But they face serious threats because of certain men's mindsets.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Adventures of Toto as a comic strip

  'The Adventures of Toto' is an amusing story by Ruskin Bond. It is prescribed as a lesson in CBSE's English course for class 9. Maggie asked her students to do a project on some of the lessons and Femi George's work is what I would like to present here. Femi converted the story into a beautiful comic strip. Her work will speak for itself and let me present it below.  Femi George Student of Carmel Public School, Vazhakulam, Kerala Similar post: The Little Girl

The Little Girl

The Little Girl is a short story by Katherine Mansfield given in the class 9 English course of NCERT. Maggie gave an assignment to her students based on the story and one of her students, Athena Baby Sabu, presented a brilliant job. She converted the story into a delightful comic strip. Mansfield tells the story of Kezia who is the eponymous little girl. Kezia is scared of her father who wields a lot of control on the entire family. She is punished severely for an unwitting mistake which makes her even more scared of her father. Her grandmother is fond of her and is her emotional succour. The grandmother is away from home one day with Kezia's mother who is hospitalised. Kezia gets her usual nightmare and is terrified. There is no one at home to console her except her father from whom she does not expect any consolation. But the father rises to the occasion and lets the little girl sleep beside him that night. She rests her head on her father's chest and can feel his heart...

India in Modi-Trap

That’s like harnessing a telescope to a Vedic chant and expecting the stars to spin closer. Illustration by Gemini AI A friend forwarded a WhatsApp message written by K Sahadevan, Malayalam writer and social activist. The central theme is a concern for science education and research in India. The writer bemoans the fact that in India science is in a prison conjured up by Narendra Modi. The message shocked me. I hadn’t been aware of many things mentioned therein. Modi is making use of Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan’s Centre for Study and Research in Indology for his nefarious purposes projected as efforts to “preserve and promote classical Indian knowledge systems [IKS]” which include Sanskrit, Ayurveda, Jyotisha (astrology), literature, philosophy, and ancient sciences and technology. The objective is to integrate science with spirituality and cultural values. That’s like harnessing a telescope to a Vedic chant and expecting the stars to spin closer. The IKS curricula have made umpteen r...

Two Women and Their Frustrations

Illustration by Gemini AI Nora and Millie are two unforgettable women in literature. Both are frustrated with their married life, though Nora’s frustration is a late experience. How they deal with their personal situations is worth a deep study. One redeems herself while the other destroys herself as well as her husband. Nora is the protagonist of Henrik Ibsen’s play, A Doll’s House , and Millie is her counterpart in Terence Rattigan’s play, The Browning Version . [The links take you to the respective text.] Personal frustration leads one to growth into an enlightened selfhood while it embitters the other. Nora’s story is emancipatory and Millie’s is destructive. Nora questions patriarchal oppression and liberates herself from it with equanimity, while Millie is trapped in a meaningless relationship. Since I have summarised these plays in earlier posts, now I’m moving on to a discussion on the enlightening contrasts between these two characters. If you’re interested in the plot ...

The Real Enemies of India

People in general are inclined to pass the blame on to others whatever the fault.  For example, we Indians love to blame the British for their alleged ‘divide-and-rule’ policy.  Did the British really divide India into Hindus and Muslims or did the Indians do it themselves?  Was there any unified entity called India in the first place before the British unified it? Having raised those questions, I’m going to commit a further sacrilege of quoting a British journalist-cum-historian.  In his magnum opus, India: a History , John Keay says that the “stock accusations of a wider Machiavellian intent to ‘divide and rule’ and to ‘stir up Hindu-Muslim animosity’” levelled against the British Raj made little sense when the freedom struggle was going on in India because there really was no unified India until the British unified it politically.  Communal divisions existed in India despite the political unification.  In fact, they existed even before the Briti...