Skip to main content

Politics of Hatred


Book Review

Title: Foot Soldier of the Constitution: A Memoir
Author: Teesta Setalvad
Publisher: LeftWord Books, New Delhi, 2017
Pages: 221       Price: ₹295

Hatred is a powerful political tool.  Its power increases in direct proportion to the symbols associated with it, especially religious or nationalistic.  Many leaders in present Indian politics rose to occupy high positions wielding this weapon effectively.  However, as it turned out, power was not their ultimate motive.  If it were the socio-political atmosphere in the country would not have been so thoroughly vitiated.

The real motive was a “Goebbelsian desire to change the narrative” of the nation, says Teesta Setalvad in her memoir.  The narrative is being altered so much that erstwhile heroes are becoming villains while people with little heroism are being elevated to heroic stature.  The alteration is not confined to historical figures alone; anyone who questions the BJP and its allies runs the risk of being projected as an enemy of the nation while those who perpetrate heinous crimes in the name of certain nationalist or religious symbols enjoy heroic status.

Teesta’s political memoir narrates the story of certain transmogrifications in the national narrative with a particular focus on the Gujarat riots of 2002.  The book reads like a creepy story that shakes the very foundations of our sensibility. 

In the very first chapter (there are only four chapters), we are told that Narendra Modi who was the Chief Minister of Gujarat was happy to hear about the Godhra train burning incident.  When he received the details from the District Collector, what Modi did first of all was to call the VHP leader Jaideep Patel, not the police or other administrators.  “A senior minister in Modi’s cabinet, Suresh Mehta (who has been the chief minister of Gujarat for a year) testified to the fact that Modi, seated next to him in the Gujarat state assembly when the Godhra train burning was discussed, had a look of satisfaction on his face. ‘Now the Hindus will awake,’ was the remark made by him.” [p. 47]

Teesta says that Modi was brought into Gujarat politics just a year back because the BJP had lost a series of by-elections and Modi was expected to resuscitate the party.  He ordered that the charred unidentifiable bodies of the kar sevaks be taken from Godhra to Allahabad in a motor cavalcade so that religious sentiments could be aroused far and wide. The strategy worked and the terrible riots broke out.  Teesta shows with evidence that the police officers were told not to do anything so that the riots would continue for a few days.  The honest police officers who resisted Modi were penalised eventually. 

Teesta quotes the report of the Concerned Citizens Tribunal, Crime Against Humanity, vol II, “Shri Modi played an active role, along with at least three cabinet colleagues, in instructing senior police personnel and civil administrators that a ‘Hindu reaction was to be expected and this must not be curtailed or controlled.’”

The history of the Gujarat riots is closely linked with Teesta’s life since she championed the cause of justice on behalf of the victims.  Her Memoir tells vividly how she was persecuted for what she did.  Many charges were fabricated against her. She continued to be persecuted all the more after Modi became the Prime Minister.

The book has been published in a time when Modi has become one of the most powerful rulers in the world.  His power within the country is ominous.  Even the mass media is scared to report against him and his party.  One must admire Teesta’s courage in publishing the Memoir at this time.

Those who are familiar with what happened during and after the 2002 riots may not find anything new in the book.  Quite a lot of Indians will hate Teesta for writing the truths so openly.  Very many will not even accept the truths.  At least a few will admire the grit of this woman called Teesta Setalvad, great granddaughter of Chamanlal Setalvad who cross-questioned General Dyer after the Jallianwallah Bagh massacre.


Comments

  1. The policy of divide and rule, still, seems to be an effective tool in hands of politicians to control the masses. :(

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Indeed. Bring along a little nationalism and add spices of religion and the concoction is very heady.

      Delete
  2. Now the Hindus will awake" means the Hindus were oppressed earlier or were not active in political forums ? Even I would also like to know the events from that period.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. https://matheikal.blogspot.in/2014/09/the-modi-fiction.html

      That's my review of another book on the riots. Teesta's is a more personal narrative.

      Delete
    2. Very informative and an excellent review. More interestingly, I also loved reading the comments. Has anything changed drastically in these three years that the blogs do not hold any longer as a medium for discussions?

      Delete
    3. My optimism in those comments were proved wrong. India has become a worse place under Modi. Criminal elements are allowed to take law into their hands in the form of gau rakshaks and anti Romeos. There is much more hatred in India today. India has become another Gujarat as the state was under Modi.

      Delete
    4. Forgot to mention blogs as a medium for discussion. Blogs today have been degenerated into another means of earning some income by writing things which others want to read! The same thing has happened to the publication industry too. Look at the kind of books being published now. Good writers have been pushed back by the bad ones.

      Delete
    5. It seems discussion is a thing of the past. People are so much polarized by hatred and blind faith that they love to impose opinions rather.

      And when books like I dumped her after the last night comes, it becomes a hot cake cause who would have the patience to read good literature when they have their opinions to shove in.

      Delete
  3. Nice blog! checkout How to root an android using kingroot andReplace Kingroot With SuperSU

    ReplyDelete
  4. Today only the verdict has come for the case of Bilkis Bano. And what's Ms. Teesta has narrated in her book (and you've quoted in this article) was portrayed very courageously by Govind Nihalani in his Hindi movie - Dev (2005) in which Amitabh Bachchan had played the title role of a dutiful cop posted in Gujarat and Amrish Puri had played the role of the Gujarat CM during the time of those so-called spontaneously broken out (as Modi-Bhaktas term them) riots. If you have not seen that movie, please do watch it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I wasn't aware of that movie. But I'll look out for it now. I'm no movie fan, that's the only problem.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Adventures of Toto as a comic strip

  'The Adventures of Toto' is an amusing story by Ruskin Bond. It is prescribed as a lesson in CBSE's English course for class 9. Maggie asked her students to do a project on some of the lessons and Femi George's work is what I would like to present here. Femi converted the story into a beautiful comic strip. Her work will speak for itself and let me present it below.  Femi George Student of Carmel Public School, Vazhakulam, Kerala Similar post: The Little Girl

Bihar Election

Satish Acharya's Cartoon on how votes were bought in Bihar My wife has been stripped of her voting rights in the revised electoral roll. She has always been a conscientious voter unlike me. I refused to vote in the last Lok Sabha election though I stood outside the polling booth for Maggie to perform what she claimed was her duty as a citizen. The irony now is that she, the dutiful citizen, has been stripped of the right, while I, the ostensible renegade gets the right that I don’t care for. Since the Booth Level Officer [BLO] was my neighbour, he went out of his way to ring up some higher officer, sitting in my house, to enquire about Maggie’s exclusion. As a result, I was given the assurance that he, the BLO, would do whatever was in his power to get my wife her voting right. More than the voting right, what really bothered me was whether the Modi government was going to strip my wife of her Indian citizenship. Anything is possible in Modi’s India: Modi hai to Mumkin hai .   ...

Nehru’s Secularism

Jawaharlal Nehru, India’s first Prime Minister, and Narendra Modi, the present one, are diametrically opposite to each other. Take any parameter, from boorishness to sophistication or religious views, and these two men would remain poles apart. Is it Nehru’s towering presence in history that intimidates Modi into hurling ceaseless allegations against him? Today, 14 Nov, is Nehru’s birth anniversary and Modi’s tweet was uncharacteristically terse. It said, “Tributes to former Prime Minister, Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru Ji on the occasion of his birth anniversary.” Somebody posted a trenchant cartoon in the comments section.  Nehru had his flaws, no doubt. He was as human as Modi. But what made him a giant while Modi remains a dwarf – as in the cartoon above – is the way they viewed human beings. For Nehru, all human beings mattered, irrespective of their caste, creed, language, etc. His concept of secularism stands a billion notches above Modi’s Hindutva-nationalism. Nehru’s ide...

The Art of Subjugation: A Case Study

Two Pulaya women, 1926 [Courtesy Mathrubhumi ] The Pulaya and Paraya communities were the original landowners in Kerala until the Brahmins arrived from the North with their religion and gods. They did not own the land individually; the lands belonged to the tribes. Then in the 8 th – 10 th centuries CE, the Brahmins known as Namboothiris in Kerala arrived and deceived the Pulayas and Parayas lock, stock, and barrel. With the help of religion. The Namboothiris proclaimed themselves the custodians of all wealth by divine mandate. They possessed the Vedic and Sanskrit mantras and tantras to prove their claims. The aboriginal people of Kerala couldn’t make head or tail of concepts such as Brahmadeya (land donated to Brahmins becoming sacred land) or Manu’s injunctions such as: “Land given to a Brahmin should never be taken back” [8.410] or “A king who confiscates land from Brahmins incurs sin” [8.394]. The Brahmins came, claimed certain powers given by the gods, and started exploi...

Duryodhana Returns

Duryodhana was bored of his centuries-long exile in Mythland and decided to return to his former kingdom. Arnab Gau-Swami had declared Bihar the new Kurukshetra and so Duryodhana chose Bihar for his adventure. And Bihar did entertain him with its modern enactment of the Mahabharata. Alliances broke, cousins pulled down each other, kings switched sides without shame, and advisers looked like modern-day Shakunis with laptops. Duryodhana’s curiosity was more than piqued. There’s more masala here than in the old Hastinapura. He decided to make a deep study of this politics so that he could conclusively prove that he was not a villain but a misunderstood statesman ahead of his time. The first lesson he learns is that everyone should claim that they are the Pandavas, and portray everyone else as the Kauravas. Every party claims they stand for dharma, the people, and justice. And then plot to topple someone, eliminate someone else, distort history, fabricate expedient truths, manipulate...