Skip to main content

Women Power




There should be no difference whatever between man and woman when it comes to dignity.  Both are the same species.  Both are required to reproduce the species if nature’s rules are respected. They are counterparts of each other.  The concept of Ardhanarishvara in Hinduism eloquently illustrates the quintessentially complementary nature of man and woman.  

Yet women have been suppressed and oppressed in most parts of the world for a very long period of history.  The morning prayer of the Jewish men may be the most blatant outrage perpetrated on women theologically.  “Thank you, Lord, for not making me a woman,” the man prays every morning.  The woman is the cause of the human sinfulness, according to the Old Testament which is sacred to both the Jews and the Christians.  There is no female Rabbi in Judaism and there is no female priest in Christianity, though the discrimination is slowly relenting.

Islam is worse than its two Semitic predecessors when it comes to women’s rights.  Sexism becomes mathematically established in Islam.  “The male shall have the equal of the portion of two females,” says Quran 4:11.  When it comes to bearing witness in the court also, one man is equal to two women in that religion (Quran 2:28).  The Hadith and Al-sira are thoroughly soaked in male chauvinism.

We are very familiar with what Hinduism did with its widows.  The system of Sati was more inhuman than all the sexist oppressions and suppressions perpetrated by the Semitic religions.  Even today the purdah continues to veil many female faces in rural North India.  In spite of such wonderful concepts as Ardhanarishvara and Durga, women were flagrantly oppressed in Hinduism.  Manusmriti, for example, subjugated the woman to the father when she was a girl, to the husband when she was a woman and to the son when might be a widow.  But the same text also very contradictorily suggests that “where women are revered, there the gods rejoice; but where they are not, no sacred rite bears any fruit.”  Hinduism had highly ambivalent attitudes towards women like many other things.

These are just some examples of how religions were highly sexist.  And religions shape people's attitudes to a very great extent. 

Religions took a backseat in the 20th century.  Consequently women began to find emancipation.  Today we speak about empowerment of women, not just emancipation.  It’s a great change.  Women are no less than men in any way.  Given the right opportunities they will perform as well as men in any field.  Women’s empowerment is precisely about giving them equal opportunities and rights.  However, we find India still grappling with obscurantist and obsolete notions regarding women. 

There is a lot of contradictoriness in our attitudes towards women.  Maybe, it’s part of our very culture and tradition.  We should resolve those contradictions and bring about a society which puts women on the same platform as men.  That’s the real empowerment of women.

PS. Written for Indispire Edition 168. #womenempowerment


Comments

  1. Every religion misinterprets its scriptures to subjugate women. Sometimes they don't even have to misinterpret - as you have pointed out with your examples. Patriarchy is rampant and insidious.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Her empowerment will be established when she will be able to walk alone without the fear of getting raped.

    I am happy with the exemplary judgment given by the SC against the nirbhaya case.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I too welcomed the judgement. In matters such as this I don't endorse the human rights activists. Harsh actions are necessary sometimes for the sake of humanity.

      Delete
  3. The real question is why there's a need to suppress women, and the answer is they are really powerful. In all animal kingdom, if you see, you'll find females are powerful than their male counterparts.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That's true. Women are suppressed because they are indeed powerful. Perhaps they will outshine men and men don't want that.

      Delete
  4. Yes, the mindset of people need to change. Women have suffered and been discriminated in all societies.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Women are coming to the forefront now. But they face serious threats because of certain men's mindsets.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Adventures of Toto as a comic strip

  'The Adventures of Toto' is an amusing story by Ruskin Bond. It is prescribed as a lesson in CBSE's English course for class 9. Maggie asked her students to do a project on some of the lessons and Femi George's work is what I would like to present here. Femi converted the story into a beautiful comic strip. Her work will speak for itself and let me present it below.  Femi George Student of Carmel Public School, Vazhakulam, Kerala Similar post: The Little Girl

The Ugly Duckling

Source: Acting Company A. A. Milne’s one-act play, The Ugly Duckling , acquired a classical status because of the hearty humour used to present a profound theme. The King and the Queen are worried because their daughter Camilla is too ugly to get a suitor. In spite of all the devious strategies employed by the King and his Chancellor, the princess remained unmarried. Camilla was blessed with a unique beauty by her two godmothers but no one could see any beauty in her physical appearance. She has an exquisitely beautiful character. What use is character? The King asks. The play is an answer to that question. Character plays the most crucial role in our moral science books and traditional rhetoric, religious scriptures and homilies. When it comes to practical life, we look for other things such as wealth, social rank, physical looks, and so on. As the King says in this play, “If a girl is beautiful, it is easy to assume that she has, tucked away inside her, an equally beauti...

Our gods must have died laughing

A friend forwarded a video clip this morning. It is an extract from a speech that celebrated Malayalam movie actor Sreenivasan delivered years ago. In the year 1984, Sreenivasan decided to marry the woman he was in love with. But his career in movies had just started and so he hadn’t made much money. Knowing his financial condition, another actor, Innocent, gave him Rs 400. Innocent wasn’t doing well either in the profession. “Alice’s bangle,” Innocent said. He had pawned or sold his wife’s bangle to get that amount for his friend. Then Sreenivasan went to Mammootty, who eventually became Malayalam’s superstar, to request for help. Mammootty gave him Rs 2000. Citing the goodness of the two men, Sreenivasan said that the wedding necklace ( mangalsutra ) he put ceremoniously around the neck of his Hindu wife was funded by a Christian (Innocent) and a Muslim (Mammootty). “What does religion matter?” Sreenivasan asks in the video. “You either refuse to believe in any or believe in a...

The Buddha in the Central Vista

Prime Minister Modi was taking a dip in the mineral water pond constructed on the bank of the Yamuna as part of his weekly photo op when Siddhartha Gautama aka the Buddha walked into the office of the National Committee for Correcting Civilizational Narratives (NCCCN) in Central Vista, New Delhi. An email was received by “Dr Sri Siddhartha Gautama Buddha PhD” from the PMO [Prime Minister’s Office] inviting him to attend a meeting “to authenticate and align the curriculum with indigenous perspectives as part of implementing the National Education Policy, NEP.” Siddhartha was amused on receiving the mail. “Is it possible they still wish to learn after proclaiming themselves the Vishwaguru?” He wondered with a wry smile. He was more amused to see the honorary doctorate conferred upon him by the Vishwaguru Vishwavidyala, in Spiritual Sciences. It’d be interesting to make a visit, he decided. When he entered the opulent office, whose floor was paved with Italian marble tiles, he reca...

The Real Enemies of India

People in general are inclined to pass the blame on to others whatever the fault.  For example, we Indians love to blame the British for their alleged ‘divide-and-rule’ policy.  Did the British really divide India into Hindus and Muslims or did the Indians do it themselves?  Was there any unified entity called India in the first place before the British unified it? Having raised those questions, I’m going to commit a further sacrilege of quoting a British journalist-cum-historian.  In his magnum opus, India: a History , John Keay says that the “stock accusations of a wider Machiavellian intent to ‘divide and rule’ and to ‘stir up Hindu-Muslim animosity’” levelled against the British Raj made little sense when the freedom struggle was going on in India because there really was no unified India until the British unified it politically.  Communal divisions existed in India despite the political unification.  In fact, they existed even before the Briti...