Skip to main content

From the diary of a blunderer

 


If you have an option to tell something to your younger writing self, what would you tell? Writer Damyanti Biswas raised this question recently. I was fascinated by the question if only because I would have liked to be an entirely different person in my youth (or at any phase, in fact). I have often described my life as a series of blunders. I am not much wiser today either though a lot of summers came and went with many sparrows chirruping various melodies. If only we could start all over again to begin with whatever semblance of wisdom we have acquired so far.

I think it was a sheer coincidence that Damyanti’s question came just as I put down the book I was reading, Reality is not what it seems by Carlo Rovelli. This book is about the uncertainty of reality from the point of view of quantum physics. Rovelli is a physicist. It is a serious book, very serious, but a particular page of it made me laugh out uncontrollably so much so Maggie began to wonder whether I had gone crankier than usual. I closed the book and continued to laugh because I couldn’t do anything else until Maggie insisted on my telling her what was so funny about quantum physics.

 Rovelli says that Paul Dirac was the greatest physicist of the 20th century after Einstein. But he is not well-known enough. “This is due, in part, to the rarefied abstraction of his science,” says Rovelli, “and partly due to his disconcerting character.” Dirac was an acute introvert who remained utterly silent in company. He was incapable of expressing emotions. He couldn’t even recognise acquaintances. Ordinary conversations made no sense to his mind that moved with electrons and fermions.

Rovelli went on to mention an anecdote. During one of his lectures, a colleague said to Dirac, “I don’t understand that formula.” Dirac paused, remained silent for a moment, and then continued as if nothing had happened. The moderator interrupted to suggest that Dirac should answer the question that was raised. Dirac was sincerely astonished. He said, “Question? What question? My colleague has made an assertion.”

I stopped reading then and there, mid-paragraph, unable to control my laughter. I narrated the anecdote to Maggie and said, “Genius is more absurd than the mediocre.”

I needed a break from reading and picked up my mobile phone. It was then Damyanti’s question flashed on the screen. This is the coincidence I mentioned earlier. Perhaps, without the bafflement of Paul Dirac, Damyanti’s question would not have bothered me much. I couldn’t have been any wiser as a young man than Paul Dirac could have been less genius in that episode.

Paul Dirac, you, and I, we all have our personalities forged partly by our genes and partly by the environment in which we had the (mis)fortune to be brought up. Dirac’s mind was far from normal. He was virtually autistic and palpably abnormal. Albert Einstein was provoked to suggest that Dirac’s mind traversed a “vertiginous course between genius and madness”. My youthful roguishness was as natural to me as the ‘vertigo’ was to Dirac.

Looking back I know how inane, absurd and futile the whole enterprise was: my writing and most of the other things I did as a young man. Life teaches harsh lessons to such people. Life doesn’t tolerate rogues as much as it does fools. Dear Damyanti, life taught me a lot, a lot more than you would imagine. If I were to tell something to that silly young writer that I was, it would be a few volumes.

This doesn’t mean I regret all that I was. No, not at all. This just means how helpless I was: I had no choice about my genes, my society, my religion and its pathetic god, all of those things that chiselled through my being relentlessly. It happens to everyone, of course. The only difference is that I was not even clever enough to dodge undesirable chisels. Can cleverness be taught? If yes, I would tell that young writer-self of mine to learn some cleverness. That would be the briefest lesson I could give him. The volumes could wait.

But it doesn’t work that way, Damyanti. A friend of mine (a rare species) told me the other day with the candidness that only a drink could have provoked: “You’re so naïve that you wouldn’t have survived so long hadn’t you cocooned yourself in your own carapace.” In other words, even life has failed to teach me some of the most essential lessons. What will I teach my younger self?

 

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Little Girl

The Little Girl is a short story by Katherine Mansfield given in the class 9 English course of NCERT. Maggie gave an assignment to her students based on the story and one of her students, Athena Baby Sabu, presented a brilliant job. She converted the story into a delightful comic strip. Mansfield tells the story of Kezia who is the eponymous little girl. Kezia is scared of her father who wields a lot of control on the entire family. She is punished severely for an unwitting mistake which makes her even more scared of her father. Her grandmother is fond of her and is her emotional succour. The grandmother is away from home one day with Kezia's mother who is hospitalised. Kezia gets her usual nightmare and is terrified. There is no one at home to console her except her father from whom she does not expect any consolation. But the father rises to the occasion and lets the little girl sleep beside him that night. She rests her head on her father's chest and can feel his heart...

Ayodhya: Kingdom of Sorrows

T he Sarayu carried more tears than water. Ayodhya was a sad kingdom. Dasaratha was a good king. He upheld dharma – justice and morality – as best as he could. The citizens were apparently happy. Then, one day, it all changed. One person is enough to change the destiny of a whole kingdom. Who was that one person? Some say it was Kaikeyi, one of the three official wives of Dasaratha. Some others say it was Manthara, Kaikeyi’s chief maid. Manthara was a hunchback. She was the caretaker of Kaikeyi right from the latter’s childhood; foster mother, so to say, because Kaikeyi had no mother. The absence of maternal influence can distort a girl child’s personality. With a foster mother like Manthara, the distortion can be really bad. Manthara was cunning, selfish, and morally ambiguous. A severe physical deformity can make one worse than all that. Manthara was as devious and manipulative as a woman could be in a men’s world. Add to that all the jealousy and ambition that insecure peo...

Liberated

Fiction - parable Vijay was familiar enough with soil and the stones it turns up to realise that he had struck something rare.   It was a tiny stone, a pitch black speck not larger than the tip of his little finger. It turned up from the intestine of the earth while Vijay was digging a pit for the biogas plant. Anand, the scientist from the village, got the stone analysed in his lab and assured, “It is a rare object.   A compound of carbonic acid and magnesium.” Anand and his fellow scientists believed that it must be a fragment of a meteoroid that hit the earth millions of years ago.   “Very rare indeed,” concluded the scientist. Now, it’s plain commonsense that something that’s very rare indeed must be very valuable too. All the more so if it came from the heavens. So Vijay got the village goldsmith to set it on a gold ring.   Vijay wore the ring proudly on his ring finger. Nobody, in the village, however bothered to pay any homage to Vijay’s...

Bharata: The Ascetic King

Bharata is disillusioned yet again. His brother, Rama the ideal man, Maryada Purushottam , is making yet another grotesque demand. Sita Devi has to prove her purity now, years after the Agni Pariksha she arranged for herself long ago in Lanka itself. Now, when she has been living for years far away from Rama with her two sons Luva and Kusha in the paternal care of no less a saint than Valmiki himself! What has happened to Rama? Bharata sits on the bank of the Sarayu with tears welling up in his eyes. Give me an answer, Sarayu, he said. Sarayu accepted Bharata’s tears too. She was used to absorbing tears. How many times has Rama come and sat upon this very same bank and wept too? Life is sorrow, Sarayu muttered to Bharata. Even if you are royal descendants of divinity itself. Rama had brought the children Luva and Kusha to Ayodhya on the day of the Ashvamedha Yagna which he was conducting in order to reaffirm his sovereignty and legitimacy over his kingdom. He didn’t know they w...

Dharma and Destiny

  Illustration by Copilot Designer Unwavering adherence to dharma causes much suffering in the Ramayana . Dharma can mean duty, righteousness, and moral order. There are many characters in the Ramayana who stick to their dharma as best as they can and cause much pain to themselves as well as others. Dasharatha sees it as his duty as a ruler (raja-dharma) to uphold truth and justice and hence has to fulfil the promise he made to Kaikeyi and send Rama into exile in spite of the anguish it causes him and many others. Rama accepts the order following his dharma as an obedient son. Sita follows her dharma as a wife and enters the forest along with her husband. The brotherly dharma of Lakshmana makes him leave his own wife and escort Rama and Sita. It’s all not that simple, however. Which dharma makes Rama suspect Sita’s purity, later in Lanka? Which dharma makes him succumb to a societal expectation instead of upholding his personal integrity, still later in Ayodhya? “You were car...