Skip to main content

DOGmatism


The Principal of a CBSE school in Kerala attended a motivation course. Consequently, he decided to give more autonomy to the staff. That was one of the lessons he had learnt during the course.

‘Now you decide what to do in your classroom and other places of your influence,’ Principal now tells a teacher.

‘Will I be paid more?’ The teacher wants to know.

‘Money is not what matters,’ Principal says. ‘What matters is your contentment.’ He tells the teacher about Maslow’s pyramid and the importance of self-actualisation.

‘Will I be paid more?’ The teacher repeats his query.

Principal takes out a book on motivation theory and asks the teacher to read it.

‘Will I be paid more if I read this?’

Dogmatism is the tendency to assert one’s prejudices or beliefs as undeniably true without consideration of evidence or the opinions of others. Dogmatism is very faithful to one’s beliefs or prejudices. Canine loyalty.

The dogmatist will go on insisting that his religion, culture, language, ideas, prejudices, whatever, is the best. He will deliver eloquent speeches with or without the help of teleprompters to force-feed people with his prejudices. He may never realise that the people are not interested in those things at all because dogmas mean nothing in the struggle for survival – unless they mean survival itself.

When survival becomes a problem, it is easy to inject any dogma into people’s veins. People will be ready to kill for the sake of dogmas provided you make their survival dependent on that. A lot of dogmas have begun to reign supreme in India now because of this.

Where dogmas rule, wisdom vanishes. Those who know, do not speak. Those who speak, do not know.

The principal in the above anecdote had converted what he had learnt in the course into certain dogmas. Instead of looking at what can really motivate his underpaid staff, he tries to force his dogmas on them.

Dogmas make us blind to the real problems. They make us filter out evidence that goes against our beliefs. They make us incapable of tolerating conflicting perspectives. We avoid certain important truths merely to uphold our dogmas. CBSE has dropped certain lessons from the syllabus because of its dogmatism. Topics on ‘democracy and diversity,’ Mughal courts, and poems by Faiz are some of the lessons that got the axe.

Shutting out certain unpleasant truths is how dogmatism deals with them. But that is not the right way. We should look at the realities from many sides, evaluate them and make informed choices and decisions. Otherwise, we will have a nation of citizens who follow certain prejudices doggedly. 

PS. This post is part of #BlogchatterA2Z 2023

Yesterday’s: Capitalism is fated to be sad

Tomorrow: Euthanasia

 

 

Comments

  1. Where dogmas rule, wisdom vanishes !! How true ! And why are we erasing the past ? It is a truth and the future generation has the right to know it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. We are rewriting history, aren't we? That's how we create a new India!

      Delete
  2. Hari Om
    Little by little dog(ma)s nibble away at rights and freedoms... YAM xx

    ReplyDelete
  3. Probably the message of the century... Very sad about CBSE pushing agenda in kids education.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. CBSE has become a pawn in the government's hand. It's very inefficient too now.

      Delete
  4. Even our children are not allowed to think freely. It is indeed a sad state of affairs.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. A nation of distorted minds is what India is becoming.

      Delete
  5. Dogmantism…..life in a nutshell.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Certainly dogmas blind us, but i do not agree the country will be ruled by any dogmas soon. What happened with cbse, if true is certainly not called for yet i do have hope for our nation, because we cannot fight one dogma with another

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. When the regime changes, the approach will change too.

      Delete
  7. Replies
    1. Whatever is happening now doesn't promise anything better than that.

      Delete
  8. Where dogmas rule, wisdom vanishes. Those who know, do not speak. Those who speak, do not know. You said it. Unfortunately we have already become a nation with a sizable chunk of its citizens following certain prejudices doggedly. Sad but true.

    ReplyDelete
  9. "People will be ready to kill for the sake of dogmas provided you make their survival dependent on that" this is the way the rulers rule no?

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Adventures of Toto as a comic strip

  'The Adventures of Toto' is an amusing story by Ruskin Bond. It is prescribed as a lesson in CBSE's English course for class 9. Maggie asked her students to do a project on some of the lessons and Femi George's work is what I would like to present here. Femi converted the story into a beautiful comic strip. Her work will speak for itself and let me present it below.  Femi George Student of Carmel Public School, Vazhakulam, Kerala Similar post: The Little Girl

The Little Girl

The Little Girl is a short story by Katherine Mansfield given in the class 9 English course of NCERT. Maggie gave an assignment to her students based on the story and one of her students, Athena Baby Sabu, presented a brilliant job. She converted the story into a delightful comic strip. Mansfield tells the story of Kezia who is the eponymous little girl. Kezia is scared of her father who wields a lot of control on the entire family. She is punished severely for an unwitting mistake which makes her even more scared of her father. Her grandmother is fond of her and is her emotional succour. The grandmother is away from home one day with Kezia's mother who is hospitalised. Kezia gets her usual nightmare and is terrified. There is no one at home to console her except her father from whom she does not expect any consolation. But the father rises to the occasion and lets the little girl sleep beside him that night. She rests her head on her father's chest and can feel his heart...

India in Modi-Trap

That’s like harnessing a telescope to a Vedic chant and expecting the stars to spin closer. Illustration by Gemini AI A friend forwarded a WhatsApp message written by K Sahadevan, Malayalam writer and social activist. The central theme is a concern for science education and research in India. The writer bemoans the fact that in India science is in a prison conjured up by Narendra Modi. The message shocked me. I hadn’t been aware of many things mentioned therein. Modi is making use of Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan’s Centre for Study and Research in Indology for his nefarious purposes projected as efforts to “preserve and promote classical Indian knowledge systems [IKS]” which include Sanskrit, Ayurveda, Jyotisha (astrology), literature, philosophy, and ancient sciences and technology. The objective is to integrate science with spirituality and cultural values. That’s like harnessing a telescope to a Vedic chant and expecting the stars to spin closer. The IKS curricula have made umpteen r...

Joys of Onam and a reflection

Suppose that the whole universe were to be saved and made perfect and happy forever on just one condition: one single soul must suffer, alone, eternally. Would this be acceptable? Philosopher William James asked that in his 1891 book, The Moral Philosopher and the Moral Life . Please think about it once again and answer the question for yourself. You, as well as others, are going to live a life without a tinge of sorrow. Joyful existence. Life in Paradise. The only condition is that one person will take up all the sorrows of the universe on him-/herself and suffer – alone, eternally. What do you say? James’s answer is a firm no . “Not even a god would be justified in setting up such a scheme,” James asserted, knowing too well how the Bible justified a positive answer to his question. “It is expedient that one man should die for the people, so that the nation can be saved” [John 11:50]. Jesus was that one man in the Biblical vision of redemption. I was reading a Malayalam period...

The Real Enemies of India

People in general are inclined to pass the blame on to others whatever the fault.  For example, we Indians love to blame the British for their alleged ‘divide-and-rule’ policy.  Did the British really divide India into Hindus and Muslims or did the Indians do it themselves?  Was there any unified entity called India in the first place before the British unified it? Having raised those questions, I’m going to commit a further sacrilege of quoting a British journalist-cum-historian.  In his magnum opus, India: a History , John Keay says that the “stock accusations of a wider Machiavellian intent to ‘divide and rule’ and to ‘stir up Hindu-Muslim animosity’” levelled against the British Raj made little sense when the freedom struggle was going on in India because there really was no unified India until the British unified it politically.  Communal divisions existed in India despite the political unification.  In fact, they existed even before the Briti...