Skip to main content

Euthanasia


Writer Arthur Koestler chose death when he thought that his productive life was over. He was suffering from Parkinson’s disease as well as leukaemia. He was a member of an organisation called Exit which supported people’s “right to die with dignity.” Koestler was 77 when he gulped down an overdose of barbiturate tablets. He didn’t want to continue the agony of his existence. I defend his decision to end his life with dignity.

But I don’t accept what his wife Cynthia did. She was in her 50s when she chose to die along with her husband. She loved him so much. That was the reason. Was it necessary to end her life just because her beloved man was dying? I don’t want to judge her. Maybe, she would find life unbearable without her man. She could have given it a try, I think.

I defend euthanasia with my whole heart in cases like Koestler’s. But not in those like Cynthia’s. When one is suffering from a terminal illness and it is certain that there is no chance of recovery at all, one should be given the freedom to end one’s life. There should be dignity in death too. I would hate to lie in a bed in utter helplessness and hopelessness, depending on someone else for everything. I would embrace death gladly in such a situation. I must be assisted to die with ease.

Why are we so hypocritical when it comes to euthanasia? We pretend to love life and defend it when our statistics speak quite something else.

Globally 800,000 people kill themselves every year. Half that number are killed by others.

150,000 Indians die on the roads every year. There are about 1130 accidents and 422 deaths taking place every day on the Indian roads. That is, 47 accidents and 18 deaths every hour.

WHO informs us that 3 million deaths happen every year from harmful use of alcohol.

We don’t even know how many farmers commit suicide in India now. In 2016, India erased those statistics from its records. Since the number of farmers choosing death became inconvenient for the government, the National Crime Records Bureau was asked to delete farmer suicides from its reports.

It is much easier to make euthanasia legal. Just shed hypocrisy instead of crocodile tears.

I know one evil does not mitigate or justify another. My point, however, is that allowing those who wish to put an end to their life due to valid reasons needn’t shock us in a world where deaths are taking place by the thousands every second. I know the practice of euthanasia can be misused. We can only prevent the misuses as much as possible. Isn’t alcohol misused? Do we ban alcohol because of that? Aren’t vehicles misused? Isn’t technology misused? We continue to use vehicles and technology, nevertheless.

Death is inevitable. It can be as absurd as in the case of the Greek writer Aeschylus. The great man was sitting in the open air when an eagle mistook his head for a rock and dropped the tortoise it was carrying right on to the writer’s head. The eagle’s intention was to get the tortoise shell broken. But it cost the life of one of the finest tragedians of Greece.

Death can come in any guise. There is no harm in letting people choose a dignified version of it if they prefer.

The death of Aeschylus illustrated in the 15th century Florentine Picture Chronicle by Maso Finiguerra

PS. This post is part of #BlogchatterA2Z 2023

Yesterday’s: DOGmatism

Tomorrow: Friendship

 

 

Comments

  1. Voluntary death is very difficult choice. I have never been able to fathom the good and bad of Euthanasia. Your post made for thoughtful read.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm quite sure that a time comes in many people's lives when they would like to make a choice to end the misery. It won't be a difficult choice, my mind tells me.

      Delete
  2. A great read and I echo your thoughts! But have we reached the maturity as a nation to legalise Euthanasia? We are busy renaming cities, erasing history and playing victim games ! I don't think we as a nation are ready to understand that death has to be dignified when people are busy making lives of the ones alive more and more difficult.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, Chinmayee, you are absolutely right and you put it as elegantly as possible too. But if I can initiate a debate on this I'd be more than satisfied for now. We as a nation need to think about real issues rather than play with imaginary fears.

      Delete
  3. Finally an article i can forward to the detractors of euthanasia. i second your opinion. I also second what the comment above mine says, India as a nation might never reach that maturity. We're too busy with ways to make life painful..

    ReplyDelete
  4. Like you, I'd 'hate to lie in a bed in utter helplessness and hopelessness, depending on someone else for everything. I would embrace death gladly in such a situation.'
    My family know this.

    This year I've seen two instances (parents of close friends) who would've preferred to 'go' in grace rather than linger on in the state they were/are in if they had a lawful choice to end life. But, sadly, that's not the case.

    There's something about 'life' that makes lawmakers hesitant to legalize euthanasia and ban abortions. Is it guilt? I wonder.

    This is a tricky debate. I hope it becomes a more open and constructive one.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Indeed, Arti, we should debate this openly. A lot of issues can be settled with open debates. Our country which was known for debates has now become terribly narrow-minded and prohibitive.

      Delete
  5. I am a believer of euthanasia...though some people might call it immoral. I believe there should be dignity in death, and Euthanasia provides that dignity to a certain extent. I do agree with Chinmayee's comment though, that as a nation I do not think we are ready for it

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. What inspires me is that there are people like you and Chinmayee and others who think about this seriously. That's already a step ahead. 👍

      Delete
  6. Hari OM
    Hear! Hear! Could't have said it better myself. In the case of the wife, of course, it was not euthenasia but outright suicide. Given that suicides have become something of their own 'pandemic' a look at quality of life in all respects seems called for. Great article. YAM xx

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I have seen a lot of people suffering unnecessarily in the fag end. It has to end once and for all, some of them know. Maybe very few. Let those few end it as merrily as they can. With a song on their lips. Or a joke like Socrates.

      Delete
  7. Euthanasia is a boon when a human being is helpless in the bed. Well written.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That final helplessness is what calls for redemption.

      Delete
  8. Replies
    1. Thank you and let's hope at least 1% of Indians will begin to agree.

      Delete
  9. I echo your thoughts too, but then when we say all life is precious it becomes difficult to convince that letting go can be better. Many many people would want a dignified death, but then who is to define those parameters can be very tough.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It is tough. But one can decide for oneself at least. I can express my desire to be given the injection if and when the time comes. And that desire should be respected.

      Delete
  10. In Mahabharata Bhishm Pitamaha had the boon of Icchhamrityu which I guess now can be termed as euthanasia. The only thing is to find the most dignified way of doing it without blaming anyone in the family or the society. In the animal world it's an acceptable norm. In case of humans it's debatable although at times it is a cruel fact that there is a limit to taking care as well. Even doing all you can you see your near and dear ones suffer ceaselessly just because God has His own timelines determined for every individual. Along with this it is also ironical that no syllabus teaches us how to handle death although it is the biggest inescapable truth of life.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Euthanasia is passive or active. Animals practise passive euthanasia by not doing anything to prolong the ending. I'm for active euthanasia in my case. Let me choose my death. No one need have any objection to that.

      I'm with you in the suggestion about instructing people about facing death.

      Delete
  11. Euthanasia has been a moral debate for decades now. I also feel that life has to be lived with dignity. If not, a person suffers needlessly. However, there are instances when people resort to unfair means to end lives. How do we prevent such cases?

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Country where humour died

Humour died a thousand deaths in India after May 2014. The reason – let me put it as someone put it on X.  The stand-up comedian Kunal Kamra called a politician some names like ‘traitor’ which made his audience laugh because they misunderstood it as a joke. Kunal Kamra has to explain the joke now in a court of justice. I hope his judge won’t be caught with crores of rupees of black money in his store room . India itself is the biggest joke now. Our courts of justice are huge jokes. Our universities are. Our temples, our textbooks, even our markets. Let alone our Parliament. I’m studying the Ramayana these days in detail because I’ve joined an A-to-Z blog challenge and my theme is Ramayana, as I wrote already in an earlier post . In order to understand the culture behind Ramayana, I even took the trouble to brush up my little knowledge of Sanskrit by attending a brief course. For proof, here’s part of a lesson in my handwriting.  The last day taught me some subhashit...

56-Inch Self-Image

The cover story of the latest issue of The Caravan [March 2025] is titled The Balakot Misdirection: How the Modi government drew political mileage out of military failure . The essay that runs to over 20 pages is a bold slap on the glowing cheek of India’s Prime Minister. The entire series of military actions taken by Narendra Modi against Pakistan, right from the surgical strike of 2016, turns out to be mere sham in this essay. War was used by all inefficient kings in the past in order to augment the patriotism of the citizens, particularly in times of trouble. For example, the Controller of the Exchequer taxed the citizens as much as he thought they could bear without violent protest and when he was wrong the King declared a war against a neighbouring country. Patriotism, nationalism, and religion – the best thing about these is that a king can use them all very effectively to control the citizens’ sentiments. Nowadays a lot of leaders emulate the ancient kings’ examples enviabl...

Abdullah’s Religion

O Abdulla Renowned Malayalam movie actor Mohanlal recently offered special prayers for Mammootty, another equally renowned actor of Kerala. The ritual was performed at Sabarimala temple, one of the supreme Hindu pilgrimage centres in Kerala. No one in Kerala found anything wrong in Mohanlal, a Hindu, praying for Mammootty, a Muslim, to a Hindu deity. Malayalis were concerned about Mammootty’s wellbeing and were relieved to know that the actor wasn’t suffering from anything as serious as it appeared. Except O Abdulla. Who is this Abdulla? I had never heard of him until he created an unsavoury controversy about a Hindu praying for a Muslim. This man’s Facebook profile describes him as: “Former Professor Islahiaya, Media Critic, Ex-Interpreter of Indian Ambassador, Founder Member MADHYAMAM.” He has 108K followers on FB. As I was reading Malayalam weekly this morning, I came to know that this Abdulla is a former member of Jamaat-e-Islami Hind Kerala , a fundamentalist organisation. ...

Lucifer and some reflections

Let me start with a disclaimer: this is not a review of the Malayalam movie, Lucifer . These are some thoughts that came to my mind as I watched the movie today. However, just to give an idea about the movie: it’s a good entertainer with an engaging plot, Bollywood style settings, superman type violence in which the hero decimates the villains with pomp and show, and a spicy dance that is neatly tucked into the terribly orgasmic climax of the plot. The theme is highly relevant and that is what engaged me more. The role of certain mafia gangs in political governance is a theme that deserves to be examined in a good movie. In the movie, the mafia-politician nexus is busted and, like in our great myths, virtue triumphs over vice. Such a triumph is an artistic requirement. Real life, however, follows the principle of entropy: chaos flourishes with vengeance. Lucifer is the real winner in real life. The title of the movie as well as a final dialogue from the eponymous hero sugg...

Violence and Leaders

The latest issue of India Today magazine studies what it calls India’s Gross Domestic Behaviour (GDB). India is all poised to be an economic superpower. But what about its civic sense? Very poor, that’s what the study has found. Can GDP numbers and infrastructure projects alone determine a country’s development? Obviously, no. Will India be a really ‘developed’ country by 2030 although it may be $7-trillion economy by then? Again, no is the answer. India’s civic behaviour leaves a lot, lot to be desired. Ironically, the brand ambassador state of the country, Uttar Pradesh, is the worst on most parameters: civic behaviour, public safety, gender attitudes, and discrimination of various types. And UP is governed by a monk!  India Today Is there any correlation between the behaviour of a people and the values and principles displayed by their leaders? This is the question that arose in my mind as I read the India Today story. I put the question to ChatGPT. “Yes,” pat came the ...