Skip to main content

Wherefore art thou?

Romeo and Juliet [PNGwing]


In Shakespeare’s notable romantic tragedy, Juliet hurls the question: “Wherefore art thou Romeo?” The meaning is ‘Why are you Romeo?’ Those who are familiar with the play will understand what Juliet meant. If Romeo’s name was different, their love would have met with no resistance. Romeo was the son and heir of the Montague family while Juliet was a Capulet. There is a violent feud going on between the two families and hence the love between Romeo and Juliet is not welcome. Juliet’s question, in fact, is: ‘Why are you a Montague?’

‘What’s in a name?’ A few moments later in the play, Juliet who has not turned 14 yet, will ask. That little girl who is yet to understand that there is much to a name will end up stabbing herself in the heart for the sake of love.

Wherefore art thou, Juliet? I am left thinking.

I turned 63 the other day. [Hitler and I share the same birthday!] Half a century older than Juliet, I ask myself: Wherefore art thou, Tomichan?

Why did Juliet exist? Why do I exist? Why does anyone exist?

Does life have a purpose?

Long ago, I chose to accept the existentialist absurdity of life. Today, as a senior citizen, I still accept the same absurdity. I haven’t been able to discover any given (by god or any sublime entity) purpose in human life in general. I do admit that there are millions of excellent human beings who live fabulously meaningful and purposeful lives, contributing tremendously towards the progress of human civilization, adding value to existence. Blessed are such people. They chose their purpose in life, I’m sure.

What we make of our life is our choice. Juliet also made that choice. She chose Romeo. She chose love, that is. What’s in a name? She would have been right. There’s nothing in a name where there is love.

But there’s no love, Juliet. That’s the problem with us human beings. We found religions in the name of love and then hate people in the name of those religions. We build up ideologies in the name of love for the nation and then go around killing people in the name of nationalism. We even kill in the name of love for cows.

There’s so much in a name, Juliet. Five centuries after you asked that question – What’s in a name? – the world hasn’t changed a bit. Name matters much. Identity matters. Which party you are matters. If you belong to this party, you can rape and kill, assault and plunder, with impunity. If you belong to that party, you can’t even crack a joke. So we keep changing parties according to the situation. We get paid for changing allegiances too. Fabulous sums of money. Dishonesty pays, Juliet. Deceit pays more. You died in vain as a child. You should have lived to understand human beings better. If you had, you wouldn’t have died for the sake of love.

I imagine you as a grown woman with grey hairs and wrinkled skin plus a lot of wisdom in your heart. Instead of stabbing your heart yourself on the realization that Romeo killed himself for your sake, I imagine that you accepted the tragedy with stoic resignation that wouldn’t have been hard to muster for a woman of your times. You would then grow up observing people and their follies. You would become wise through understanding the essential absurdity of human life. You would have gained a developed consciousness.

What makes God tolerate human beings must be God’s developed consciousness.

Wherefore didst thou die, Juliet, when nothing less than divinity awaited you? 

PS. This post is part of #BlogchatterA2Z 2023

Previous Post: Velocity in Shillong

Coming up tomorrow: Xenophobia

Comments

  1. Hey Tom! Aren't you being slightly over cynical today morning! Yes you are correct but there are things that signify love. Things that cannot be destroyed! The sweet melody of music, the precision of mathematics which I know you love! I do agree affection between human beings is a bit overrated and is not worth dying for... But what about love that is not tangible even in spiritual terms...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The precision of maths and the chaos of emotions, both are dominant in me, Jai. The idealism of youth and the cynicism of age too. I gave in to that paradox this morning.

      Delete
  2. I used to scoff at Romeo Juliet because i always saw it as puppy love gone wrong. 14 is a weird age, i was 14 not thaaat long ago. So i never appreciated the story for its message. But as you say nothing has changed. And though Juliet seems to have died for a seeimingly insignificant cause...in the present world there's little noble left to die for. So i agree. Stoic acceptance is the only way to accept. But even then, i think not everyone who lives upto the wise age has mastered stoicism to deal with it- Already I know I wont be one of them!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Your self-awareness is going to take you farther than you seem to presume.

      I never liked the play either. One of the immature plays of the Bard. But Juliet keeps popping her head in my heart every now and then.

      Delete
  3. Really such a thoughtful post! Purpose of life ..I chose medical profession so that I could be of some value to the society. But after having kids, I feel that my main purpose would be to raise them to be worthy human beings.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. There's no better purpose than that: to make our children worthy human beings.

      Delete
  4. Hari OM
    Belated greetings, fellow Aprilian... today I count off number 64! I would like to think I have become the crone you describe, for I certainly never fell into the Juliet format. YAM xx

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Greetings to you too, Yam. You must be laughing heartily looking back at your life, I'm sure.

      Delete
  5. What an imagination! Sometimes, I too think what is the purpose of this existence...may be this should end and I should begin again from scratch so that I can correct some errors I made along the way. And yes! I agree, everything IS in a name, at least in the times we live in. If I didn't have the invisible 'Iyer' surname clinging with my name, I would have had so many more opportunities! That's just one thing...there's so much more!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Excited to meet yet another candid person. I've felt a million times that this should end and I should be given a chance to begin again. But we are condemned to this one existence, one form, one format!

      And the name too. I lived mostly in North India and statements like 'Ab Madrasi ka bhi sun-na hai' were too frequent.

      Name matters too.

      Maybe, i didn't learn the necessary tricks.

      Delete
  6. I have never liked Romeo and Juliet as a play. Them dying felt like a cop out. Like they didn't have enough courage to do what they wanted to do. They gave in. But now that I'm older and wiser, maybe they were just tired of always having to explain themselves and perhaps death felt like a release.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Not a great play, of course, especially from a genius. And they were too young. Then those times...

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Grandeur of the dooms

John Keats by William Hilton [Wikipedia] One of the poems included in CBSE’s class 12 English literature is an extract from Keats’ Endymion . A question that has come to me again and again from students as well as teachers is: What does “the grandeur of the dooms…” mean? It is a line that has perplexed me too. I have been amused by the kind of interpretations given in the guidebooks for students. Quite many of these books interpret the word ‘dooms’ to mean the Doomsday. Look at the following answer given in one such guidebook made available online by a well-known educational establishment.  That is very amusing considering the fact that Keats was an agnostic, if not a confirmed atheist. Keats would never accept a God who would come riding a majestic cloud on the day of the Last Judgment to apportion the good and the evil souls to Heaven and Hell. Evil is an integral part of life, Keats knew too well. No human can avoid evil any more than “a rose can avoid a blighting wind.” How...

Water as Weapon

A scene from Kerala The theme chosen for their monthly blog hop by friends Manali Desai and Sukaina Majeed is water, particularly because March 22 is World Water Day. It is of vital importance to discuss the global water crisis because as the motto of Delhi Jal Board says: Jal hi Jeevan hai , Water is Life . The crisis is only going to become more and more acute as we move on. With a global population clocking 8.5 billion by 2030, the demand for fresh water will rise sharply, especially in urban areas. The climate change, particularly rising temperatures, prolonged droughts, and erratic rainfall patterns, will add significantly to the problem. Ground water is getting depleted in many countries. Consequently, water is likely to be a strategic asset in the near future. Powerful individuals, corporations, and nations may use it as a weapon in several ways. Rivers can be blocked with dams and water supply to neighbouring nations can be manipulated. Ethiopia’s Grand Renaissance Dam o...

Broligarchy

A page from Time Broligarchy is a new word I learnt from the latest issue of the Time magazine one of whose lead stories is titled ‘ American Broligarchy ’. Wikipedia teaches me that ‘broligarchy’ is “a neologism and portmanteau combining oligarchy and broism describing the rule of government by a coterie of extremely wealthy men (occupying leadership roles in the tech companies and tech-enabled businesses).” The Time article informs us that Trump’s greatest “bros” are Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos, and Mark Zuckerberg, the three men who were given the most prominent seats, ahead of Cabinet members, at Trump’s Presidential inauguration. These wealthy businessmen play crucial roles in Trump’s way of governing America. They pump a lot of unregulated money into politics for their own selfish reasons. A menacing outcome is an unhealthy (for the public) expansion of presidential power with fewer checks on the Congress. The Time laments that this “would be a recipe for more corruption under an...

Waiting for the Mahatma

Book Review I read this book purely by chance. R K Narayan is not a writer whom I would choose for any reason whatever. He is too simple, simplistic. I was at school on Saturday last and I suddenly found myself without anything to do though I was on duty. Some duties are like that: like a traffic policeman’s duty on a road without any traffic! So I went up to the school library and picked up a book which looked clean. It happened to be Waiting for the Mahatma by R K Narayan. A small book of 200 pages which I almost finished reading on the same day. The novel was originally published in 1955, written probably as a tribute to Mahatma Gandhi and India’s struggle for independence. The edition that I read is a later reprint by Penguin Classics. Twenty-year-old Sriram is the protagonist though Gandhi towers above everybody else in the novel just as he did in India of the independence-struggle years. Sriram who lives with his grandmother inherits significant wealth when he turns 20. Hi...

Love Affair of Pearl Spot

AI-generated I am not fond of fish. Fish doesn’t taste like fish, that’s the reason. We get adulterated fish most of the time. In Kerala, my state, traders are reported to use formalin for preserving the freshness of fish. Formalin is used for preserving dead bodies by embalming. You will find me in a fish stall once in a while, though. My cats want fish occasionally, that’s why. Not that they are particularly fond of it. For a change from the regular pellets and packaged wet foods, all delivered promptly by Amazon. Even cats love a change. Most of the time, the entire fish that I buy is consumed by my cats. So much so, Maggie and I have come to think that fish is cat food, not human food. People may have different reasons for not eating any particular food. One of the most endearing reasons I heard recently is that fish is a symbol of the voiceless. People commit atrocities on fish, this person said [I forget who – I read it a couple of weeks back on Magzter]. They suffocate it ...