Skip to main content

Wherefore art thou?

Romeo and Juliet [PNGwing]


In Shakespeare’s notable romantic tragedy, Juliet hurls the question: “Wherefore art thou Romeo?” The meaning is ‘Why are you Romeo?’ Those who are familiar with the play will understand what Juliet meant. If Romeo’s name was different, their love would have met with no resistance. Romeo was the son and heir of the Montague family while Juliet was a Capulet. There is a violent feud going on between the two families and hence the love between Romeo and Juliet is not welcome. Juliet’s question, in fact, is: ‘Why are you a Montague?’

‘What’s in a name?’ A few moments later in the play, Juliet who has not turned 14 yet, will ask. That little girl who is yet to understand that there is much to a name will end up stabbing herself in the heart for the sake of love.

Wherefore art thou, Juliet? I am left thinking.

I turned 63 the other day. [Hitler and I share the same birthday!] Half a century older than Juliet, I ask myself: Wherefore art thou, Tomichan?

Why did Juliet exist? Why do I exist? Why does anyone exist?

Does life have a purpose?

Long ago, I chose to accept the existentialist absurdity of life. Today, as a senior citizen, I still accept the same absurdity. I haven’t been able to discover any given (by god or any sublime entity) purpose in human life in general. I do admit that there are millions of excellent human beings who live fabulously meaningful and purposeful lives, contributing tremendously towards the progress of human civilization, adding value to existence. Blessed are such people. They chose their purpose in life, I’m sure.

What we make of our life is our choice. Juliet also made that choice. She chose Romeo. She chose love, that is. What’s in a name? She would have been right. There’s nothing in a name where there is love.

But there’s no love, Juliet. That’s the problem with us human beings. We found religions in the name of love and then hate people in the name of those religions. We build up ideologies in the name of love for the nation and then go around killing people in the name of nationalism. We even kill in the name of love for cows.

There’s so much in a name, Juliet. Five centuries after you asked that question – What’s in a name? – the world hasn’t changed a bit. Name matters much. Identity matters. Which party you are matters. If you belong to this party, you can rape and kill, assault and plunder, with impunity. If you belong to that party, you can’t even crack a joke. So we keep changing parties according to the situation. We get paid for changing allegiances too. Fabulous sums of money. Dishonesty pays, Juliet. Deceit pays more. You died in vain as a child. You should have lived to understand human beings better. If you had, you wouldn’t have died for the sake of love.

I imagine you as a grown woman with grey hairs and wrinkled skin plus a lot of wisdom in your heart. Instead of stabbing your heart yourself on the realization that Romeo killed himself for your sake, I imagine that you accepted the tragedy with stoic resignation that wouldn’t have been hard to muster for a woman of your times. You would then grow up observing people and their follies. You would become wise through understanding the essential absurdity of human life. You would have gained a developed consciousness.

What makes God tolerate human beings must be God’s developed consciousness.

Wherefore didst thou die, Juliet, when nothing less than divinity awaited you? 

PS. This post is part of #BlogchatterA2Z 2023

Previous Post: Velocity in Shillong

Coming up tomorrow: Xenophobia

Comments

  1. Hey Tom! Aren't you being slightly over cynical today morning! Yes you are correct but there are things that signify love. Things that cannot be destroyed! The sweet melody of music, the precision of mathematics which I know you love! I do agree affection between human beings is a bit overrated and is not worth dying for... But what about love that is not tangible even in spiritual terms...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The precision of maths and the chaos of emotions, both are dominant in me, Jai. The idealism of youth and the cynicism of age too. I gave in to that paradox this morning.

      Delete
  2. I used to scoff at Romeo Juliet because i always saw it as puppy love gone wrong. 14 is a weird age, i was 14 not thaaat long ago. So i never appreciated the story for its message. But as you say nothing has changed. And though Juliet seems to have died for a seeimingly insignificant cause...in the present world there's little noble left to die for. So i agree. Stoic acceptance is the only way to accept. But even then, i think not everyone who lives upto the wise age has mastered stoicism to deal with it- Already I know I wont be one of them!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Your self-awareness is going to take you farther than you seem to presume.

      I never liked the play either. One of the immature plays of the Bard. But Juliet keeps popping her head in my heart every now and then.

      Delete
  3. Really such a thoughtful post! Purpose of life ..I chose medical profession so that I could be of some value to the society. But after having kids, I feel that my main purpose would be to raise them to be worthy human beings.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. There's no better purpose than that: to make our children worthy human beings.

      Delete
  4. Hari OM
    Belated greetings, fellow Aprilian... today I count off number 64! I would like to think I have become the crone you describe, for I certainly never fell into the Juliet format. YAM xx

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Greetings to you too, Yam. You must be laughing heartily looking back at your life, I'm sure.

      Delete
  5. What an imagination! Sometimes, I too think what is the purpose of this existence...may be this should end and I should begin again from scratch so that I can correct some errors I made along the way. And yes! I agree, everything IS in a name, at least in the times we live in. If I didn't have the invisible 'Iyer' surname clinging with my name, I would have had so many more opportunities! That's just one thing...there's so much more!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Excited to meet yet another candid person. I've felt a million times that this should end and I should be given a chance to begin again. But we are condemned to this one existence, one form, one format!

      And the name too. I lived mostly in North India and statements like 'Ab Madrasi ka bhi sun-na hai' were too frequent.

      Name matters too.

      Maybe, i didn't learn the necessary tricks.

      Delete
  6. I have never liked Romeo and Juliet as a play. Them dying felt like a cop out. Like they didn't have enough courage to do what they wanted to do. They gave in. But now that I'm older and wiser, maybe they were just tired of always having to explain themselves and perhaps death felt like a release.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Not a great play, of course, especially from a genius. And they were too young. Then those times...

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Adventures of Toto as a comic strip

  'The Adventures of Toto' is an amusing story by Ruskin Bond. It is prescribed as a lesson in CBSE's English course for class 9. Maggie asked her students to do a project on some of the lessons and Femi George's work is what I would like to present here. Femi converted the story into a beautiful comic strip. Her work will speak for itself and let me present it below.  Femi George Student of Carmel Public School, Vazhakulam, Kerala Similar post: The Little Girl

In this Wonderland

I didn’t write anything in the last few days. Nor did I feel any urge to write. I don’t know if this lack of interest to write is what’s called writer’s block. Or is it simple disenchantment with whatever is happening around me? We’re living in a time that offers much, too much, to writers. The whole world looks like a complex plot for a gigantic epic. The line between truth and fiction has disappeared. Mass murders have become no-news. Animals get more compassion than fellow human beings. Even their excreta are venerated! Folk tales are presented as scientific truths while scientific truths are sacrificed on the altar of political expediency. When the young generation in Nepal set fire to their Parliament and Supreme Court buildings, they were making an unmistakable statement: that they are sick of their political leaders and their systems. Is there any country whose leaders don’t sicken their citizens? I’m just wondering. Maybe, there are good leaders still left in a few coun...

Death as a Sculptor

Book Discussion An Introductory Note : This is not a book review but a reflection on one of the many themes in The Infatuations , novel by Javier Marias. If you have any intention of reading the novel, please be forewarned that this post contains spoilers. For my review of the book, without spoilers, read an earlier post: The Infatuations (2013). D eath can reshape the reality for the survivors of the departed. For example, a man’s death can entirely alter the lives of his surviving family members: his wife and children, particularly. That sounds like a cliché. Javier Marias’ novel, The Infatuations , shows us that death can alter a lot more; it can reshape meanings, relationships, and even morality of the people affected by the death. Miguel Deverne is killed by an abnormal man right in the beginning of the novel. It seems like an accidental killing. But it isn’t. There are more people than the apparently insane killer involved in the crime and there are motives which are di...

Whose Rama?

Book Review Title: Whose Rama? [Malayalam] Author: T S Syamkumar Publisher: D C Books, Kerala Pages: 352 Rama may be an incarnation of God Vishnu, but is he as noble a man [ Maryada Purushottam ] as he is projected to be by certain sections of Hindus? This is the theme of Dr Syamkumar’s book, written in Malayalam. There is no English translation available yet. Rama is a creation of the Brahmins, asserts the author of this book. The Ramayana upholds the unjust caste system created by Brahmins for their own wellbeing. Everyone else exists for the sake of the Brahmin wellbeing. If the Kshatriyas are given the role of rulers, it is only because the Brahmins need such men to fight and die for them. Valmiki’s Rama too upheld that unjust system merely because that was his Kshatriya-dharma, allotted by the Brahmins. One of the many evils that Valmiki’s Rama perpetrates heartlessly is the killing of Shambuka, a boy who belonged to a low caste but chose to become an ascetic. The...

When Cricket Becomes War

Illustration by Copilot Designer Why did India agree to play Pakistan at all if the animosity runs so deep that Indian players could not even extend the customary handshake: a simple ritual that embodies the very essence of sportsmanship? Cricket is not war, in the first place. When a nation turns a game into a war, it does not defeat its rival; it only wages war on its own culture, poisoning its acclaimed greatness. India which claims to be Viswaguru , the world’s Guru, is degenerating itself day after day with mounting hatred against everyone who is not Hindu. How can we forget what India did to a young cricket player named Mohammed Siraj , especially in this context? In the recent test series against England, India achieved an unexpected draw because of Siraj. 1113 balls and 23 wickets. He was instrumental in India’s series-levelling victory in the final Test at the Oval and was declared the Player of the Match. But India did not celebrate him. Instead, it mocked him for his o...