Skip to main content

Z of Life


Death was the reward that Greece presented to Socrates for thinking freely and teaching others to do the same. Those who teach people faster than they can learn are doomed. And people don’t really learn much. Socrates was not understood by the ordinary folk of Greece. So they wanted him to die. Socrates could have got a longer life had he apologised. Apologise to whom? The ordinary people whom he had always held in contempt. No, he would never do that. “Give me the hemlock,” he demanded.

They put in him prison till the hour of his death. His influential friends visited him in prison and told him that he could still escape; they had bribed all the officials who stood between him and liberty. Socrates was 70. He knew he didn’t have much time left anyway. Why not die honourably then? “Give me the hemlock.”

The jailer brought the poison and apologised. He did not wish to kill “the noblest and gentlest and best of all who ever came to this place.” But he had to obey orders. Socrates answered, “I return your good wishes.” He took the cup of poison and drank it. Death crept up his feet. He could feel his body going numb. “When the poison reaches the heart, that will be the end,” Socrates said to the few friends who were present in the jail-cell.

“Crito, I owe a cock to Asclepius; will you remember to pay the debt?” Crito agreed instantly. “Is there anything else?” There was no answer. The great philosopher of Greece was dead, killed by his own people for the offence of teaching them to think.

Let us fast-forward the time to 30 April 1945, 23 centuries after the death of Socrates. In a bunker in Berlin, a man who aimed to become the emperor of the world shoots himself. He had imagined himself as the Messiah of mankind. He wanted to purify humanity by exterminating the impure races. The world shall have only the Aryans, the purest race of people. His messianic dreams led to the death of 53 lakh German soldiers, 6.5 lakh citizens, and 60 lakh Jews. The World War 2 killed about 8 crore people in the world. One man’s dreams turned out to be quite costly for mankind.

Just two days prior to Hitler’s death, another man who had imagined himself as a Messiah, Benito Mussolini, had been put to death by the people of his country. He was hanged upside down. This ruler who had imagined himself to be far greater than what he really was died like a coward. History records that just before death, Mussolini’s “face was like wax and his stare glassy, but somehow blind…. Mussolini seemed completely lacking in will, spiritually dead.”

Death is inevitable. But one can die like Socrates with pride and dignity instead of ending as a coward like the dictators.

Old age is a time when people look back at their own life – how satisfying or fulfilling has it been? Many things might have gone wrong. They do. That’s how life is. But there are many things that give us a sense of fulfilment. Something that makes us feel that our life was fruitful in spite of the fact that many people might not have liked us. Even Socrates had haters. But Socrates died with a sense of fulfilment. Hitler couldn’t do that. Mussolini couldn’t.

What we do with our life matters much in how we are going to die. Death need not be bad at all. Death is a relief. A release.

“What does a good death look like?” Eric Weiner asks in his book The Socrates Express. “It usually (but not always) comes at the end of a good life” [emphasis added]. Weiner gives us the example of philosopher Michel de Montaigne.

The year is 1569. Thirty-six-year-old Montaigne is riding a horse. It’s a docile horse that he is highly used to. Then comes another rider, astride a powerful workhorse, riding at a supersonic speed. An accident occurs. This express rider hits Montaigne’s horse with all his strength and weight. Montaigne is thrown off his horse. He is there now on the ground bruised and bleeding and motionless. People think he is dead.

But he is not dead. He vomits blood profusely. He thinks he is going to die. He closes his eyes and takes pleasure in letting himself go, as if sliding gently into sleep. “If this is death, Montaigne thought, it’s not so bad, not bad at all.” Montaigne later wrote about the “infinite sweetness” of that experience. It would have been “a very happy death,” he wrote.

Montaigne died in 1592 at the age of 59. An infected tonsil was the cause. Montaigne who loved good conversations had to die in utter silence because of the illness. But he died happily. A friend of his wrote that Montaigne “tasted and took death with sweetness.” One of the last things he did was to summon his household staff and pay them their inheritance. He was a good man.

How you die is often determined by how you live. Not as a rule, of course. We can view death as more benign than a catastrophe or something. “As something beautiful and inevitable,” as Montaigne puts it. Acceptance is the secret. Accept the simple fact that death is our inevitable end. Learn to smile at that and there you are – free to climb the peaks and cross the ravines. 

PS. This post is the last part of #BlogchatterA2Z 2023

Previous Post: Yesterdays

 

Comments

  1. Hari OM
    Quite so! I congratulate you on noting that the "Z" of life is its ending - and also that you have reached the end of A-Z with aplomb!!! YAM xx

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you, Yam. It was great having you in this space all these days.

      Delete
  2. So true and a perfect finish to the AtoZ challenge.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Death will always hold our fascination, we can all just try to be as graceful as Socrates... A fitting closure for the month and challenge.

    ReplyDelete
  4. We're all going to die. When my time come. Which I like to see a lease 22 or more years. But I just want to sleep and not wake up. When it time.
    Coffee is on and stay safe.

    ReplyDelete
  5. A well thought composition. I liked the way you brought the death of Socrates and Hitler both died but one was happy other not. The key remains to be happy. So we should choose to follow our happiness and live everyday so that whenever death comes we will not be surprised. Very good post.

    ReplyDelete
  6. A very thought provoking last post. Death determines life and life determines death. So simple.

    ReplyDelete
  7. 👏 enjoyed doing the challenge with you

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ayodhya: Kingdom of Sorrows

T he Sarayu carried more tears than water. Ayodhya was a sad kingdom. Dasaratha was a good king. He upheld dharma – justice and morality – as best as he could. The citizens were apparently happy. Then, one day, it all changed. One person is enough to change the destiny of a whole kingdom. Who was that one person? Some say it was Kaikeyi, one of the three official wives of Dasaratha. Some others say it was Manthara, Kaikeyi’s chief maid. Manthara was a hunchback. She was the caretaker of Kaikeyi right from the latter’s childhood; foster mother, so to say, because Kaikeyi had no mother. The absence of maternal influence can distort a girl child’s personality. With a foster mother like Manthara, the distortion can be really bad. Manthara was cunning, selfish, and morally ambiguous. A severe physical deformity can make one worse than all that. Manthara was as devious and manipulative as a woman could be in a men’s world. Add to that all the jealousy and ambition that insecure peo...

Lucifer and some reflections

Let me start with a disclaimer: this is not a review of the Malayalam movie, Lucifer . These are some thoughts that came to my mind as I watched the movie today. However, just to give an idea about the movie: it’s a good entertainer with an engaging plot, Bollywood style settings, superman type violence in which the hero decimates the villains with pomp and show, and a spicy dance that is neatly tucked into the terribly orgasmic climax of the plot. The theme is highly relevant and that is what engaged me more. The role of certain mafia gangs in political governance is a theme that deserves to be examined in a good movie. In the movie, the mafia-politician nexus is busted and, like in our great myths, virtue triumphs over vice. Such a triumph is an artistic requirement. Real life, however, follows the principle of entropy: chaos flourishes with vengeance. Lucifer is the real winner in real life. The title of the movie as well as a final dialogue from the eponymous hero sugg...

Abdullah’s Religion

O Abdulla Renowned Malayalam movie actor Mohanlal recently offered special prayers for Mammootty, another equally renowned actor of Kerala. The ritual was performed at Sabarimala temple, one of the supreme Hindu pilgrimage centres in Kerala. No one in Kerala found anything wrong in Mohanlal, a Hindu, praying for Mammootty, a Muslim, to a Hindu deity. Malayalis were concerned about Mammootty’s wellbeing and were relieved to know that the actor wasn’t suffering from anything as serious as it appeared. Except O Abdulla. Who is this Abdulla? I had never heard of him until he created an unsavoury controversy about a Hindu praying for a Muslim. This man’s Facebook profile describes him as: “Former Professor Islahiaya, Media Critic, Ex-Interpreter of Indian Ambassador, Founder Member MADHYAMAM.” He has 108K followers on FB. As I was reading Malayalam weekly this morning, I came to know that this Abdulla is a former member of Jamaat-e-Islami Hind Kerala , a fundamentalist organisation. ...

Empuraan and Ramayana

Maggie and I will be watching the Malayalam movie Empuraan tomorrow. The tickets are booked. The movie has created a lot of controversy in Kerala and the director has decided to impose no less than 17 censors on it himself. I want to watch it before the jingoistic scissors find its way to the movie. It is surprising that the people of Kerala took such exception to this movie when the same people had no problem with the utterly malicious and mendacious movie The Kerala Story (2023). [My post on that movie, which I didn’t watch, is here .] Empuraan is based partly on the Gujarat riots of 2002. The riots were real and the BJP’s role in it (Mr Modi’s, in fact) is well-known. So, Empuraan isn’t giving the audience any falsehood as The Kerala Story did. Moreover, The Kerala Story maligned the people of Kerala while Empuraan is about something that happened in the faraway Gujarat quite long ago. Why are the people of Kerala then upset with Empuraan ? Because it tells the truth, M...

Empuraan – Review

Revenge is an ancient theme in human narratives. Give a moral rationale for the revenge and make the antagonist look monstrously evil, then you have the material for a good work of art. Add to that some spices from contemporary politics and the recipe is quite right for a hit movie. This is what you get in the Malayalam movie, Empuraan , which is running full houses now despite the trenchant opposition to it from the emergent Hindutva forces in the state. First of all, I fail to understand why so much brouhaha was hollered by the Hindutvans [let me coin that word for sheer convenience] who managed to get some 3 minutes censored from the 3-hour movie. The movie doesn’t make any explicit mention of any of the existing Hindutva political parties or other organisations. On the other hand, Allahu Akbar is shouted menacingly by Islamic terrorists, albeit towards the end. True, the movie begins with an implicit reference to what happened in Gujarat in 2002 after the Godhra train burnin...