Skip to main content

Capitalism is fated to be sad


Capitalism without discontentment is like Christianity without hell, if I may paraphrase Frank Borman. Discontentment is an integral part of the capitalist system because the system is stuck at the lowest levels of human aspirations.

Psychologist Abraham Maslow arranged human aspirations in a pyramid-shaped continuum, ranging from the inferior needs which are largely focused on the body to the higher needs of the psyche, culminating in what one may call the soul. Most of us are familiar with Maslow’s pyramid. Nevertheless, let me present it below if only to remind us of certain details. 

You will easily notice that capitalism is stuck at the lowest of Maslow’s hierarchy of aspirations. The most successful businesses of capitalism cater to our physical and simpler psychological needs. Oil and gas, mining, constructions, textile, agriculture, pharmaceuticals, electronics, telecommunications, insurance, banking… none of these touches those aspirations of ours that bring us deeper happiness or a sense of fulfilment.

Capitalism is not concerned with things that deliver the higher sorts of satisfaction. Capitalism is determined to keep us at the lowest levels of existence, promising us sensual delights and luxury or affluence. Even when it does promise something that borders on the higher aspirations like love and intimacy, Kamasutra condoms or Viagra pills are likely to pop up rather than a group or a club that brings like-minded people together in meaningful relationships.

Wealth creation is the ultimate goal of capitalism. It celebrates the richest people in the world every year in various ways. It projects the richest as the heroes of our times. In the process, it keeps people just there: at the lowest levels of human existence.

Genuine happiness comes from reaching the higher levels of love and relationships, personal accomplishments, and self-actualisation. Capitalism is not concerned with these.

The mother of a very rich family asks her young son, “What does your girlfriend like in you?”

“She thinks I’m handsome, talented and rich.”

“And what do you like about her?”

“She thinks I’m handsome, talented and rich.”

That probably is the self-esteem that capitalism endows too many people with. That is why capitalism is fated to be sad.

PS. This post is part of #BlogchatterA2Z 2023

Yesterday’s: Behold the Beauty

Tomorrow: DOGmatism

 

Comments

  1. Absolutely correct! Capitalism is a sad fate. There is more to happiness….which capitalism comes short of in providing. A man could be perfect on the outside…having the most beautiful and luxurious items of the world(the best looking women, wealth, money, outer luxurys) and yet not have the inner satisfaction which brings peace to heart. This is why many world leaders and great kingpins have turned their lifes to religious beliefs and to improve spiritual health. From personal experiences and living a prior wildlife, I could without a doubt, say that their is way more to this capitalistic life (worldy-life… as the Bible would say) than we seek.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm thrilled to see you here, Joshua. Together we can make a better world, you know. You know what I mean.

      Delete
    2. Yes sir. Excited just like how you are😌

      Delete
  2. I think capitalism isnt fated to be sad, more like few bad apples have created a system where they exploit capitalism. They can, if they chose to, offer ways of self actualization to the general public but don't because their subscribing model is: keep them poor so we can prosper. On the other hand, there are genuine people who want to break the cycle. That is how countries like USA and others in the west have, in recent years, been focused on issues like Gender rights, equality, things that fall in the self actualization category of the pyramid. Among every system that exists, capitalism is still the only democratic path to success offered to any individual, its is an open entry to a better life. But like you said it is bound to bring up discontentment. As for fated, well, Id like to believe we have the power to change that fate, a freedom that a system only capitalism offers.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Every system can be good, Careena. Socialism is an ideal philosophy. But it failed because of us. Capitalism is not so ideal because, as I said in the post, its focus rather low-level. Yet it could have succeeded if we wanted it to. But humans are so wicked that no system will save us. So many gods incarnated in various forms to destroy evil among humankind. But evil continues to be stronger than ever!

      Delete
    2. Ahh yes rightly so. No system can survive our wickedness anymore.

      Delete
  3. I liked your opening line, sets the tone for what has to follow. Capitalist have survived long and done good for themselves, there must be some merit in it, though i fail to see it just like you. Wealth creation as you point out is it's major goal, isn't that what all of us seek too.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. When I think of wealth creation, what comes up in my mind is one of my neighbours. He is an old man. Very old. He lives in a palatial house with a lake of his own. He is so old that he cannot enjoy anything in that house or outside. There is a North Indian servant who lives in what's called 'out-house'. He looks after that old man whose offspring are all abroad making more wealth. For whom? For what?

      Delete
  4. I think to understand Maslow's pyramid one needs to have a higher level of thinking. For most of the people usually see/feel/think the external. Thus for them Capitalism is all that is shiny. They are hardly bothered by their soul or higher purpose in life.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. And capitalism encourages people to stay just at that level: sensual delights. Even religion is that for them. Recently I visited a famous pilgrimage centre in Kerala, my state. What I noticed, among a lot of things, is the number of donation boxes. More than 20. You find donation boxes everywhere. It's business. Nothing to do with spirituality.

      Delete
  5. Hari OM
    Your earlier commenters have covered the territory- I just add my usual 'whoop-whoop' for your well considered piece! YAM xx

    ReplyDelete
  6. I am in awe with your topics. Some of them are bouncers for.me but you make me think about it and leave me wanting to know more

    ReplyDelete
  7. I believe true self-esteem comes from a sense of inner fulfillment, connection with others, and a sense of purpose beyond the accumulation of wealth which capitalism has failed us to realise or reach. The dialogue at the end of your writing is the cherry on the cake. Well written, as always!
    P.S.: A few months back I came across this Maslow's pyramid and since then I feel there is something in it comparable with the chakra system in spiritual concept though there are stark differences between the both. I am just not able to put a finger on it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Self-esteem cannot come from accumulation of wealth or things. So capitalism is quite helpless there.

      I'm not familiar with the chakra system.

      Delete
  8. I remember Maslow's hierarchy during my MBA days and yes I agree, Capitalism is all about the shine & Glitter from the outside and is not a source of happiness.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Happiness and contentment is independent of all "Ism"s which are man made. Each one will have to find his/her own way to fulfillment which is not a one glove fits all.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. True. But capitalism cannot reach the highest levels in Maslow's theory because by its very theory it is stuck at the lower levels.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Adventures of Toto as a comic strip

  'The Adventures of Toto' is an amusing story by Ruskin Bond. It is prescribed as a lesson in CBSE's English course for class 9. Maggie asked her students to do a project on some of the lessons and Femi George's work is what I would like to present here. Femi converted the story into a beautiful comic strip. Her work will speak for itself and let me present it below.  Femi George Student of Carmel Public School, Vazhakulam, Kerala Similar post: The Little Girl

In this Wonderland

I didn’t write anything in the last few days. Nor did I feel any urge to write. I don’t know if this lack of interest to write is what’s called writer’s block. Or is it simple disenchantment with whatever is happening around me? We’re living in a time that offers much, too much, to writers. The whole world looks like a complex plot for a gigantic epic. The line between truth and fiction has disappeared. Mass murders have become no-news. Animals get more compassion than fellow human beings. Even their excreta are venerated! Folk tales are presented as scientific truths while scientific truths are sacrificed on the altar of political expediency. When the young generation in Nepal set fire to their Parliament and Supreme Court buildings, they were making an unmistakable statement: that they are sick of their political leaders and their systems. Is there any country whose leaders don’t sicken their citizens? I’m just wondering. Maybe, there are good leaders still left in a few coun...

Death as a Sculptor

Book Discussion An Introductory Note : This is not a book review but a reflection on one of the many themes in The Infatuations , novel by Javier Marias. If you have any intention of reading the novel, please be forewarned that this post contains spoilers. For my review of the book, without spoilers, read an earlier post: The Infatuations (2013). D eath can reshape the reality for the survivors of the departed. For example, a man’s death can entirely alter the lives of his surviving family members: his wife and children, particularly. That sounds like a cliché. Javier Marias’ novel, The Infatuations , shows us that death can alter a lot more; it can reshape meanings, relationships, and even morality of the people affected by the death. Miguel Deverne is killed by an abnormal man right in the beginning of the novel. It seems like an accidental killing. But it isn’t. There are more people than the apparently insane killer involved in the crime and there are motives which are di...

Whose Rama?

Book Review Title: Whose Rama? [Malayalam] Author: T S Syamkumar Publisher: D C Books, Kerala Pages: 352 Rama may be an incarnation of God Vishnu, but is he as noble a man [ Maryada Purushottam ] as he is projected to be by certain sections of Hindus? This is the theme of Dr Syamkumar’s book, written in Malayalam. There is no English translation available yet. Rama is a creation of the Brahmins, asserts the author of this book. The Ramayana upholds the unjust caste system created by Brahmins for their own wellbeing. Everyone else exists for the sake of the Brahmin wellbeing. If the Kshatriyas are given the role of rulers, it is only because the Brahmins need such men to fight and die for them. Valmiki’s Rama too upheld that unjust system merely because that was his Kshatriya-dharma, allotted by the Brahmins. One of the many evils that Valmiki’s Rama perpetrates heartlessly is the killing of Shambuka, a boy who belonged to a low caste but chose to become an ascetic. The...

When Cricket Becomes War

Illustration by Copilot Designer Why did India agree to play Pakistan at all if the animosity runs so deep that Indian players could not even extend the customary handshake: a simple ritual that embodies the very essence of sportsmanship? Cricket is not war, in the first place. When a nation turns a game into a war, it does not defeat its rival; it only wages war on its own culture, poisoning its acclaimed greatness. India which claims to be Viswaguru , the world’s Guru, is degenerating itself day after day with mounting hatred against everyone who is not Hindu. How can we forget what India did to a young cricket player named Mohammed Siraj , especially in this context? In the recent test series against England, India achieved an unexpected draw because of Siraj. 1113 balls and 23 wickets. He was instrumental in India’s series-levelling victory in the final Test at the Oval and was declared the Player of the Match. But India did not celebrate him. Instead, it mocked him for his o...