Skip to main content

Uriel the gargoyle-maker


Uriel was a multifaceted personality. He could stab with words, sting like Mike Tyson, and distort reality charmingly with the precision of a gifted cartoonist. He was sedate now and passionate the next moment. He could don the mantle of a carpenter, a plumber, or a mechanic, as situation demanded. He ran a school in Shillong in those days when I was there. That’s how I landed in the magic circle of his friendship.

He made me a gargoyle. Gradually.

When the refined side of human civilisation shaped magnificent castles and cathedrals, the darker side of the same homo sapiens gave birth to gargoyles. These grotesque shapes were erected on those beautiful works of architecture as if to prove that there is no human genius without a dash of perversion. In many parts of India, some such repulsive shape is placed in a prominent place of great edifices with the intention of warding off evil or, more commonly, the evil eye.

I was Uriel’s gargoyle for warding off the evil eye from his school, I think.

I was teaching at St Joseph’s school when I first met Uriel in his own privately owned school in another corner of Shillong town. We had a common friend and that’s how we happened to meet. Eventually Uriel drew me into his magic circle. We drank together on weekends. We dined together sometimes. I even spent a few nights in his school on some such wild and witchy occasions. Something deep within me knew I was in the wrong place, I think, because on many such nights I would get up after one short sleep feeling out of place and would walk out of the place. I would walk back to my own residence ignoring the terrible cold in the mountains of Shillong. Ignoring other potential hazards too. The local people wouldn’t have looked kindly upon a dkhar (outsider) who walked around in the middle of the night. My nocturnal drunken outings taught me the plain truth that neither the antisocial elements of the society nor the supernatural creatures of the dark bothered to disturb the calm of the misty nights in the hills. So those outings became an additional intoxication for me. I would leave Uriel’s place when the whole hills were in sound sleep. Was it the charm of the hills that drew me or an internal repulsive mechanism that couldn’t accept Uriel for some reason that I never deciphered?

It would be ungrateful to write like this about Uriel because I ate a lot of his rice. Both Uriel and I belong to a culture that ordains ingratitude to one whose food you have eaten as a great sin. Why did I accept that friendship at all if something was revolting deep within me all the time? It is impossible to imagine that it was just the greed for Uriel’s whisky and dinner that drew me to him. I hardly ate anything in those days. Even today, food refuses to charm me. I eat little. My physician keeps telling me I am underweight.

Was Uriel an open flame and I a moth that flew into it?

Uriel was the sculptor and I was the gargoyle. Uriel was dreaming up a utopia and I was the gargoyle he would erect right in front of the edifice of his dream.

Eight years after I met Uriel first, I got a lecturer’s job in a premier college in Shillong. Within days of my appointment as a lecturer, Uriel took me in his car from my residence to his school for a celebration. He picked up another common friend too on the way. This friend opened a beer bottle on the way and we shared it while the car kept moving. By the time the car reached in front of the college that had appointed me, the bottle was empty. The friend, who was also a lecturer in another college, threw the empty bottle right in front of ‘my’ college’s gate and laughed with a lot of mirth. Uriel laughed too rather uncharacteristically. The message that they were trying to convey was not lost on me: the college had made a drastic mistake by appointing me.

Soon Uriel left Shillong rather unceremoniously. He didn’t want to run the school anymore. Some kind of religious fervour had swallowed his spirit. “He always had the passion and now he has found a cause,” a friend remarked.

Religion is the ultimate solace for those who have the passion without a cause. And religion loves to mould gargoyles out of those who are perceived as evil. Monstrous shapes that carry the filth of the holy. Symbols of Satan that should motivate the struggling virtuous. Uriel’s entire life has been dedicated to noble spiritual causes ever since he left Shillong. Since I’m not there anywhere in the vicinity, he may have created another gargoyle in his new place. One of the inevitabilities of religions is the creation of gargoyles at appropriate times.

 

PS. I'm participating in #BlogchatterA2Z 

A

B

C

D

E

F

G

H

I

J

K

L

M

N

O

P

Q

R

S

T

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Comments

  1. A very meaningful navigation through themes of friendship, cultural identity, and existential introspection, effectively using the gargoyle as a symbol to discuss the darker, often overlooked aspects of human endeavors and relationships.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Interesting. Did you ever find out what it was about him that troubled you so? That bottle thrown outside your uni anecdote, i interpret it as them voicing out their inferiority complex. I guess, secretly they hated you had been elevated to such a position. Such 'friends' are a menace~

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Does the moth ever think why the flame beckons it?

      Some friends are actually not friends, that's the plain truth. They are ringmasters...

      Delete
  3. The way you have used gargoyle in your narrative is quite creative.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hari OM
    So, he was a bad influence - or you took advantage? There is something in here that causes me to think that your own conscience is pricked. Or at least a recognition of your own submission to his presence... any 'sculptor' can only hew what is already in the stone before them... am I harsh, or assuming an uncreditable familiarity? YAM xx

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think you're right, Yam. He was not an influence on me anyway. Maybe it's just that I, a bachelor, took advantage of the hospitality. Maybe, there was a masochist in me.

      Delete
    2. Let me add that this same Uriel was mentioned in an earlier post: https://matheikal.blogspot.com/2024/04/joe-tenacious-friend.html
      I point this out so that you may get a better picture of him and my relationship with him

      Delete
  5. What if the gargoyles are the good guys? It sounds like you didn't like who you were when you were with him. Why do we hang with people who turn us into things we don't like? It's an interesting lesson.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Shillong back then was a drab and withdrawn hillstation with absolutely no entertainment. Some friendships were the only redeeming factors!

      Delete
  6. Running a school and throwing whiskey bottle in front of the college? Crazy. Concerns for the students and staff members of his school weigh on my mind.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ayodhya: Kingdom of Sorrows

T he Sarayu carried more tears than water. Ayodhya was a sad kingdom. Dasaratha was a good king. He upheld dharma – justice and morality – as best as he could. The citizens were apparently happy. Then, one day, it all changed. One person is enough to change the destiny of a whole kingdom. Who was that one person? Some say it was Kaikeyi, one of the three official wives of Dasaratha. Some others say it was Manthara, Kaikeyi’s chief maid. Manthara was a hunchback. She was the caretaker of Kaikeyi right from the latter’s childhood; foster mother, so to say, because Kaikeyi had no mother. The absence of maternal influence can distort a girl child’s personality. With a foster mother like Manthara, the distortion can be really bad. Manthara was cunning, selfish, and morally ambiguous. A severe physical deformity can make one worse than all that. Manthara was as devious and manipulative as a woman could be in a men’s world. Add to that all the jealousy and ambition that insecure peo...

Abdullah’s Religion

O Abdulla Renowned Malayalam movie actor Mohanlal recently offered special prayers for Mammootty, another equally renowned actor of Kerala. The ritual was performed at Sabarimala temple, one of the supreme Hindu pilgrimage centres in Kerala. No one in Kerala found anything wrong in Mohanlal, a Hindu, praying for Mammootty, a Muslim, to a Hindu deity. Malayalis were concerned about Mammootty’s wellbeing and were relieved to know that the actor wasn’t suffering from anything as serious as it appeared. Except O Abdulla. Who is this Abdulla? I had never heard of him until he created an unsavoury controversy about a Hindu praying for a Muslim. This man’s Facebook profile describes him as: “Former Professor Islahiaya, Media Critic, Ex-Interpreter of Indian Ambassador, Founder Member MADHYAMAM.” He has 108K followers on FB. As I was reading Malayalam weekly this morning, I came to know that this Abdulla is a former member of Jamaat-e-Islami Hind Kerala , a fundamentalist organisation. ...

Lucifer and some reflections

Let me start with a disclaimer: this is not a review of the Malayalam movie, Lucifer . These are some thoughts that came to my mind as I watched the movie today. However, just to give an idea about the movie: it’s a good entertainer with an engaging plot, Bollywood style settings, superman type violence in which the hero decimates the villains with pomp and show, and a spicy dance that is neatly tucked into the terribly orgasmic climax of the plot. The theme is highly relevant and that is what engaged me more. The role of certain mafia gangs in political governance is a theme that deserves to be examined in a good movie. In the movie, the mafia-politician nexus is busted and, like in our great myths, virtue triumphs over vice. Such a triumph is an artistic requirement. Real life, however, follows the principle of entropy: chaos flourishes with vengeance. Lucifer is the real winner in real life. The title of the movie as well as a final dialogue from the eponymous hero sugg...

Empuraan and Ramayana

Maggie and I will be watching the Malayalam movie Empuraan tomorrow. The tickets are booked. The movie has created a lot of controversy in Kerala and the director has decided to impose no less than 17 censors on it himself. I want to watch it before the jingoistic scissors find its way to the movie. It is surprising that the people of Kerala took such exception to this movie when the same people had no problem with the utterly malicious and mendacious movie The Kerala Story (2023). [My post on that movie, which I didn’t watch, is here .] Empuraan is based partly on the Gujarat riots of 2002. The riots were real and the BJP’s role in it (Mr Modi’s, in fact) is well-known. So, Empuraan isn’t giving the audience any falsehood as The Kerala Story did. Moreover, The Kerala Story maligned the people of Kerala while Empuraan is about something that happened in the faraway Gujarat quite long ago. Why are the people of Kerala then upset with Empuraan ? Because it tells the truth, M...

Empuraan – Review

Revenge is an ancient theme in human narratives. Give a moral rationale for the revenge and make the antagonist look monstrously evil, then you have the material for a good work of art. Add to that some spices from contemporary politics and the recipe is quite right for a hit movie. This is what you get in the Malayalam movie, Empuraan , which is running full houses now despite the trenchant opposition to it from the emergent Hindutva forces in the state. First of all, I fail to understand why so much brouhaha was hollered by the Hindutvans [let me coin that word for sheer convenience] who managed to get some 3 minutes censored from the 3-hour movie. The movie doesn’t make any explicit mention of any of the existing Hindutva political parties or other organisations. On the other hand, Allahu Akbar is shouted menacingly by Islamic terrorists, albeit towards the end. True, the movie begins with an implicit reference to what happened in Gujarat in 2002 after the Godhra train burnin...