Skip to main content

Anand and trust


Anand was a good storyteller. We walked for years on the Mehrauli-Bhatti Mines Road in Delhi in the evenings. He was a good friend while we both were teaching at Sawan Public School. What drew me to him was his ability to create stories out of very ordinary mundane things that happened at school. These stories had a unique touch of humour, one which mingled subtlety, sarcasm and slapstick in just the right proportion. Anand would laugh hilariously at his own stories after delivering the punchline. My laughter was always subdued because life had smothered much of my ability to laugh before I reached Delhi.

It was during one of those walks that Anand told me the story of his being hijacked for a short period in his home state of Haryana. He was driving to a destination that was new to him. Those were days when the Google map was not available yet. So he was forced to stop at a particular junction to enquire about the way.

“I’m also going to that place,” the man on the roadside said to Anand. The stranger entered the car.

Their conversation soon shifted to politics particularly because their chief minister was embroiled in a scam at that time. Om Prakash Chautala, a man with immense political clout and who was the state’s chief minister many times, was charged under the Prevention of Corruption Act. He, along with his accomplices, had recruited over 3000 unqualified teachers to the state’s schools.

Anand had personal reasons to be furious with Chautala. He was a qualified postgraduate with many years of experience as a teacher, but he couldn’t get a job in his own state because of the corrupt politicians there.

When Anand’s car reached a particular place, his hitchhiker said, “Stop, I have to get down here.”

“How do I go now to my destination?” Anand asked him as he alighted.

“You go back to the place from where you picked me up and go in the opposite direction.” That man went his way as if nothing had happened.

“This is how Haryana is,” Anand told me as he concluded his anecdote.

A few years later, Anand did the same to me.

Anand betrayed my trust one day by telling the school authorities something about me which I had confided in him confidentially. I refused to take it as yet another specimen of the typical Haryanvi exploit because my association with Anand had a history that spanned a few years. I took his deed as a betrayal, breach of trust by a friend. I consoled myself eventually by drawing an analogy between Anand and Coleridge’s Ancient Mariner.

The old sailor in Coleridge’s poem was stuck in the South Pole when his ship got wedged between icebergs. There was no sign of life anywhere in that desolate place; there was only water and ice all around. It was then an albatross came from nowhere. Soon the bird became a friend of the sailors in the ship. It accepted the food given by them. It started coming to them whenever they called. The albatross trusted the sailors.

Then, one day, for no reason at all, the old sailor took his gun and shot the albatross. The sailor never found peace after that.

I was only consoling myself with the analogy between Anand and the old sailor. It was I who lost peace after Anand’s betrayal. Nothing changed in him. I brooded over the betrayal by a friend. Anand got what he wanted: proximity to some of the most powerful people in the school. He was ambitious. He wouldn’t shoot the albatross without a reason, without a calculated motive.

But there had been an error from my side too. I had done something that wasn’t exactly the right thing to do though my intention was good. I had forgotten that the road to hell is paved with good intentions. I went to the higher authority and acknowledged my mistake. Ironically, the authority hadn’t thought of my deed as a big mistake as much as a lack of trust in them on my part.

In other words, instead of confiding in Anand, if I had taken the concerned problem to the school authorities, a possible solution could have been discussed. My behaviour smacked of immature rebellion.

I leant two lessons. One, if you have a problem with your institution or organisation, take it to the authority concerned and discuss it like a responsible staff instead of behaving like a terrorist who attacks the system stealthily. Two, human trust has its limits. If you stretch it beyond the limit, you will be taken for a ride.

Today, Anand is a teacher in a government school in his own home state. His nemesis, O P Chautala, spent a decade in jail for depriving Anand and others like him of justice. I am unable to continue the friendship, however, because one act of betrayal is enough to kill a relationship for ever.

Mehrauli-Bhatti Mines Road

PS. I'm participating in #BlogchatterA2Z 

Comments

  1. Anand "ji" was also involved in extramarital affair with a lady of almost half his age and students would say-"Hume ek nahi mil rahi, Sir do-do sambhal rahe hain" 🤣 🤣 🤣 A legend for sure 👏

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That could have been just friendship as well.

      Delete
    2. Hi, That is a cheap gossip if a man and a woman spend some time on a walk all because they happened to be in the same department. If it was an affair, it need not have been in the open that too very much visible to his wife from the window of their accommodation on campus, my dear! Sawan never escaped unfounded blames.

      Delete
    3. And a person like Anand would never behave in front of his students that way. His wife wasn't as educated as others at Sawan. But she had common sense!

      Delete
    4. Maggie suggested me to remove the insinuating comment. But I have allowed anonymous comments with certain reasons though this was not one among the reasons. Nevertheless, I let it be if only to show that this space offers liberty. But how much liberty should I offer, I may have to take a decision in future.

      Delete
  2. So I do feel bad for Anand being taken for a wrong ride. And I have had many fair weather friends, so I learned long back that there is no such thing as a secret or confiding in someone to vent out. You learn as go along. And eventually, you flow.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, life is the best teacher, though a bit cruel at times.

      Delete
  3. It's a bitter pill to be betrayed by a friend. But yes, I learnt early on the importance of open communication at the workplace.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Life will be much smoother with sufficient openness. The problem is openness can be misused too.

      Delete
  4. Your post truly captures the pain of long-term friendships ending on a sour note. The breakdown of trust is a significant thing, and it's something we all encounter throughout life, across generations. In my professional experience, maintaining both a close personal friendship and a strong working relationship with the same person can be challenging. However, your point about the importance of maintaining a good rapport with school management is highly recommended. There's a wise Tamil proverb that applies here: "சாட்சிக் காரன் காலில் விழுவதை விட சண்டைக்காரன் காலில் விழுவது மேல்" (Saaṭci kāraṉ kālil viḻuvatai viṭa caṇṭaikāṟan kālil viḻuvatu mēl), which translates to "It's better to bow before the opposite party than the one who witnesses.". Keep A2Z going!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Betrayal is terribly painful. Worse, if the person begins to talk about you to others. Luckily for me, his talks didn't have many takers.

      I agree that we need to cultivate diplomatic relationships in workplace.

      Delete
  5. Betrayal of trust is a big way to end a friendship. Even if he did it for the right reasons, I can see why you wouldn't consider him a friend any longer.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Instead of approaching the admin, he could have discussed the matter with me. That's friendship.

      Delete
  6. You gave a very insightful enlightenment to all who are working professionals. I agree with you that choosing right things is integral in all walks of our lives. If we are right we don't have to beg and bribe others to safeguard us. We are free to walk. Your story touched all those elements in my professional life. Your story took me back to all those incidences. some bitter but all worked for good.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Betrayal is painful. But trusting a person doesn't have its limitations if the friendship is chosen with wisdom. I think you couldn't see the difference between companionship and friendship. I don't know how much you agree to this viewpoint.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You may be right. In fact, I didn't trust him in the beginning. But years of togetherness does bring in a difference to any friendship!

      Delete
  8. That's true. It is human to look for a friend from the people around.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Oof. Betrayal by a friend, you can forgive but never forget. Workplace openess is a double edged sword from my experience.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. We learn some lessons rather late. I could never bring myself to trust a friend after this experience.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ayodhya: Kingdom of Sorrows

T he Sarayu carried more tears than water. Ayodhya was a sad kingdom. Dasaratha was a good king. He upheld dharma – justice and morality – as best as he could. The citizens were apparently happy. Then, one day, it all changed. One person is enough to change the destiny of a whole kingdom. Who was that one person? Some say it was Kaikeyi, one of the three official wives of Dasaratha. Some others say it was Manthara, Kaikeyi’s chief maid. Manthara was a hunchback. She was the caretaker of Kaikeyi right from the latter’s childhood; foster mother, so to say, because Kaikeyi had no mother. The absence of maternal influence can distort a girl child’s personality. With a foster mother like Manthara, the distortion can be really bad. Manthara was cunning, selfish, and morally ambiguous. A severe physical deformity can make one worse than all that. Manthara was as devious and manipulative as a woman could be in a men’s world. Add to that all the jealousy and ambition that insecure peo...

Abdullah’s Religion

O Abdulla Renowned Malayalam movie actor Mohanlal recently offered special prayers for Mammootty, another equally renowned actor of Kerala. The ritual was performed at Sabarimala temple, one of the supreme Hindu pilgrimage centres in Kerala. No one in Kerala found anything wrong in Mohanlal, a Hindu, praying for Mammootty, a Muslim, to a Hindu deity. Malayalis were concerned about Mammootty’s wellbeing and were relieved to know that the actor wasn’t suffering from anything as serious as it appeared. Except O Abdulla. Who is this Abdulla? I had never heard of him until he created an unsavoury controversy about a Hindu praying for a Muslim. This man’s Facebook profile describes him as: “Former Professor Islahiaya, Media Critic, Ex-Interpreter of Indian Ambassador, Founder Member MADHYAMAM.” He has 108K followers on FB. As I was reading Malayalam weekly this morning, I came to know that this Abdulla is a former member of Jamaat-e-Islami Hind Kerala , a fundamentalist organisation. ...

Lucifer and some reflections

Let me start with a disclaimer: this is not a review of the Malayalam movie, Lucifer . These are some thoughts that came to my mind as I watched the movie today. However, just to give an idea about the movie: it’s a good entertainer with an engaging plot, Bollywood style settings, superman type violence in which the hero decimates the villains with pomp and show, and a spicy dance that is neatly tucked into the terribly orgasmic climax of the plot. The theme is highly relevant and that is what engaged me more. The role of certain mafia gangs in political governance is a theme that deserves to be examined in a good movie. In the movie, the mafia-politician nexus is busted and, like in our great myths, virtue triumphs over vice. Such a triumph is an artistic requirement. Real life, however, follows the principle of entropy: chaos flourishes with vengeance. Lucifer is the real winner in real life. The title of the movie as well as a final dialogue from the eponymous hero sugg...

Empuraan and Ramayana

Maggie and I will be watching the Malayalam movie Empuraan tomorrow. The tickets are booked. The movie has created a lot of controversy in Kerala and the director has decided to impose no less than 17 censors on it himself. I want to watch it before the jingoistic scissors find its way to the movie. It is surprising that the people of Kerala took such exception to this movie when the same people had no problem with the utterly malicious and mendacious movie The Kerala Story (2023). [My post on that movie, which I didn’t watch, is here .] Empuraan is based partly on the Gujarat riots of 2002. The riots were real and the BJP’s role in it (Mr Modi’s, in fact) is well-known. So, Empuraan isn’t giving the audience any falsehood as The Kerala Story did. Moreover, The Kerala Story maligned the people of Kerala while Empuraan is about something that happened in the faraway Gujarat quite long ago. Why are the people of Kerala then upset with Empuraan ? Because it tells the truth, M...

Empuraan – Review

Revenge is an ancient theme in human narratives. Give a moral rationale for the revenge and make the antagonist look monstrously evil, then you have the material for a good work of art. Add to that some spices from contemporary politics and the recipe is quite right for a hit movie. This is what you get in the Malayalam movie, Empuraan , which is running full houses now despite the trenchant opposition to it from the emergent Hindutva forces in the state. First of all, I fail to understand why so much brouhaha was hollered by the Hindutvans [let me coin that word for sheer convenience] who managed to get some 3 minutes censored from the 3-hour movie. The movie doesn’t make any explicit mention of any of the existing Hindutva political parties or other organisations. On the other hand, Allahu Akbar is shouted menacingly by Islamic terrorists, albeit towards the end. True, the movie begins with an implicit reference to what happened in Gujarat in 2002 after the Godhra train burnin...