Skip to main content

The Yogi and the Layman


When I was a young man I had the opportunity to listen to a great speech by a yogi who demonstrated the merits of yoga.  “We can live a healthy life for a hundred years if we practice yoga ascetically,” he concluded as the audience burst into a thunderous applause.  Later one of the invited guests present on the stage asked the yogi, “Do you ever enjoy some of the simple pleasures of life like eating some food which is forbidden by your creed, sipping a whiskey with sparkling soda and some ice cubes, lying on a beach watching without feeling guilty beautiful girls walk by wearing bikini...?”

“No,” admitted the yogi.

“What’s the point of living a hundred years then?” asked the man. 

And the yogi’s answer was a silent stare.

Recently I visited a religious centre in Punjab.  The cult has over 5000 acres of land on which an entire township is built up.  But nobody can use even the mobile phone in that township.  There’s a whole list of Do’s and Don’ts, unbreakable commandments that one has to obey the moment one is inside the township.  My instinctual feeling, as I learnt about how people lived in that township, was pity.  The people were missing something valuable, I thought.  They were being deprived of the opportunities to explore life in their own way, to decide what was good and bad for themselves, to know and experience the agonies and ecstasies of human existence... Their life is a straitjacket.  Every movement of theirs is circumscribed.  Every gesture has to adhere to the prescribed code of behaviour. 

Susan Hill narrated the tale of a man who was very scared of living among people.  He was scared that he might fall in love with a girl who would jilt him, slip on a banana peel and be laughed at, be knocked down by a speeding vehicle... So he decided to live in the absolute security of his own room.  He never stepped out.  One day a painting on the wall lost its moorings and fell on him and he died.

I think living within the boundaries drawn by any religion or organisation is as good as the life of the man in the story.  Life is a series of lessons, experiences that keep enriching us until we have to take leave of this planet.  Who has the right to tell us what we should learn and what we shouldn’t?

Yes, the wisdom of others can be a good signpost, guiding light.  But their wisdom is theirs; each one of us has to arrive at our own wisdom, travelling our own roads in life.  For the yogi, living a hundred years without falling ill may be the greatest virtue.  But  there would be no Vasco da Gama or Edmund Hillary if everyone thought the yogi was right.  In fact, there would be nothing interesting in life if everyone followed the yogi.  All creativity comes from questioning the boundaries of existence.  

I would rather be a mountaineer who climbs peaks until I succumb to one than a yogi who sits in a cave hoping to live a hundred years.







Comments

  1. I agree completely Tom. I think that rigid followers of this creed or that guru, are child-like people who are afraid of life and need some kind of security, a father-figure, to tell them what they should or should not do!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Childish, I would say, Sunil ji, rather than childlike. I still believe that Freud was right when he said that religion is infantile.

      Delete
  2. Lovely point... live life to the fullest, it should be enjoyed... not restricted...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Live life to the fullest. How lovely! Yes, that's what I would like to see people doing. But not without restrictions. Restrictions will be imposed by oneself. One should know why.

      Delete
  3. Awesome ...explore your ownself and explore the world that would be the worthy life. .

    ReplyDelete
  4. Lovely post..I totally agree with the crux of it... the last line says it all... :-)

    ReplyDelete
  5. I agree with you when you choose human choices over rules laid down by the so called people of God. Having seen my late younger brother adhere to a strictly regimented cult/group, I found much fault in him for being so irrational, for not living a full life, for not getting married. He died all of 32 last year. But, given his medical complications, and the suffering he went through in the form of endless dialyses week after week, I was also amazed at the solace this belief seemed to give him. My parents are still followers of this group, and I have changed my response to their beliefs now. If by choosing a certain way of life, they experience happiness, and if they are likely to feel sad if, like me were atheists, I would rather they stick to a sect and practise what I clearly see as irrational. The understanding that I can't decide for everyone else is the crucial difference between my past and present worldviews...
    Cheers and thanks, as always, for making me reflect on life...

    ReplyDelete
  6. Having said that, I completely agree that a life filled with mystery, with the exploration of the unknown, and one which is not bound entirely by external rules, is the better one any day...
    But, did Sisyphus live a life any worse than mine? I am not really sure...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sisyphus made his choice and that's what matters, even as you have said in the first part of your comment.

      I also agree with you that if a person finds genuine meaning in religion (in the sense that it adds quality to his/her life), I won't stand in the way of his/her belief. My wife is a devout Christian and I have not questioned her faith at any time just as she leaves me to my lack of religious faith. I know that religion made it easy for my mother to accept much pain in life with resignation. But I always thought that such religion acted more as a drug than anything spiritual. Still, I wouldn't take it away from people if they need it.

      Delete
  7. Expressed well. Thought provoking.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Wonderful post Tomichan. Short and yet such a powerful and fresh thought. I am so happy I visited your blog and chanced upon this post. You are absolutely right, living is learning and learning is all about new and fresh experiences and seeing things though your own eyes rather than that of others.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You've provided a succinct summary of what I have said. Thanks. Glad you liked it.

      Delete
  9. Hmm... Its better to hear the bulbul sing then the mouse squeak.... :)

    ReplyDelete
  10. Everyone to his own. If we do not like a thing we should not do the. If someone else likes a different thing, good for him. We cannot judge others using our point of view always.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. People do what they like whether you and I like it or not. It's impossible to go through life without making judgements. Moreover what we do has its impact on others. So it's inevitable to question too.

      Delete
  11. Very well expressed and you made your point ! Living through one's own experiences is far better than being told what to do. But isnt that the bane of parenting as well, when parents continually tell the child what to do and the child refuses to heed.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. When it comes to children the changes. They need guidance obviously. But guidance is not brainwashing.

      Delete
  12. Good analogy of various instances Tom!!.. I like subjectivity, on a friendly note i would like to contradict on some points..
    when we were child hopefully we tend NOT to do what our elders say, to test what happens if i do so... at end even we follow or not we learn from it..
    my father always use to say even till my graduation dat - do get up early and sleep early and never listened, but after 2-3 yrs when i am doing my higher studies i realise it now when i am away from them and i do follow it atleast now...i do regret some times i should have followed many things which my elders asked us to be in disciplined way..
    so going by rules will not ought to be a within boundaries, restriction only happens when he becomes uncomfortable.
    an example of yogi and hillary are 2 different context and cant be compared,
    we cant give a laptop and wifi to a tribal people on a word of development, need to respect their boundaries, culture, rights on their way..even our constitution of india also says so and result is the formation of their ministries..
    the para which speaks about a yoga guru who lived 100yrs would be an example to billions to cure and approach to live a healthy life.. Enjoyment for a yogi will be controlling his senses on difficult instances of life and that would be his greatest success, so comparing the same to a person who sips whisky, soda, ice, beach babes would be uselss. people if they dont like rules of others they tend to change their ecosystem itself.ex: many ppl under Khap panchayat do like their rules even it looks weird for most of others, but there are contradictory instances like girl from H.P went beyond the boundaries and left home to pursue career in film - kangana..it varies.. success and failure are NOT life but yes a part of life, its a process not product, just need to enjoy and not to accept it.. :)
    thanks for the article, which invoked some thoughts from me.. :)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Right now I'm in a place with poor connectivity. Hope to answer you at length when I return to Delhi. Debate is most welcome. .. unlike in the case of religious people. :)

      Delete
  13. How true! There's no reason to live when you can't do the things that you want to.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Those who genuinely seek their own paths are more honest in life than any followers of paths shown by others.

      Delete
  14. Agreed to every line...each life depends on a journey of self-exploration and self-experiences. And the only thing to notice is that our path should not hinder the growth of someone else path...it just should grow mutually.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Precisely. Seek one's ways without harming others. If possible help others. ...

      Delete
  15. I am reading your blog post after a long time. I agree with what you brought up over here. Experiences shall teach us what to do or what not to. Theories are the experiences of others... What about mine?
    It was a nice read. :) Would try to visit regularly.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Glad to see you after a while, Namrata. You were busy with exams or something of the sort, I understand.

      Others can be of much help, as I have implied in the post. But we should not blindly accept their "theories" or views or philosophy or whatever. Our life is ours, our experiences coupled with our personality will determine our "truths" and our philosophy. Only such philosophy is worthwhile in the end.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ayodhya: Kingdom of Sorrows

T he Sarayu carried more tears than water. Ayodhya was a sad kingdom. Dasaratha was a good king. He upheld dharma – justice and morality – as best as he could. The citizens were apparently happy. Then, one day, it all changed. One person is enough to change the destiny of a whole kingdom. Who was that one person? Some say it was Kaikeyi, one of the three official wives of Dasaratha. Some others say it was Manthara, Kaikeyi’s chief maid. Manthara was a hunchback. She was the caretaker of Kaikeyi right from the latter’s childhood; foster mother, so to say, because Kaikeyi had no mother. The absence of maternal influence can distort a girl child’s personality. With a foster mother like Manthara, the distortion can be really bad. Manthara was cunning, selfish, and morally ambiguous. A severe physical deformity can make one worse than all that. Manthara was as devious and manipulative as a woman could be in a men’s world. Add to that all the jealousy and ambition that insecure peo...

Abdullah’s Religion

O Abdulla Renowned Malayalam movie actor Mohanlal recently offered special prayers for Mammootty, another equally renowned actor of Kerala. The ritual was performed at Sabarimala temple, one of the supreme Hindu pilgrimage centres in Kerala. No one in Kerala found anything wrong in Mohanlal, a Hindu, praying for Mammootty, a Muslim, to a Hindu deity. Malayalis were concerned about Mammootty’s wellbeing and were relieved to know that the actor wasn’t suffering from anything as serious as it appeared. Except O Abdulla. Who is this Abdulla? I had never heard of him until he created an unsavoury controversy about a Hindu praying for a Muslim. This man’s Facebook profile describes him as: “Former Professor Islahiaya, Media Critic, Ex-Interpreter of Indian Ambassador, Founder Member MADHYAMAM.” He has 108K followers on FB. As I was reading Malayalam weekly this morning, I came to know that this Abdulla is a former member of Jamaat-e-Islami Hind Kerala , a fundamentalist organisation. ...

Lucifer and some reflections

Let me start with a disclaimer: this is not a review of the Malayalam movie, Lucifer . These are some thoughts that came to my mind as I watched the movie today. However, just to give an idea about the movie: it’s a good entertainer with an engaging plot, Bollywood style settings, superman type violence in which the hero decimates the villains with pomp and show, and a spicy dance that is neatly tucked into the terribly orgasmic climax of the plot. The theme is highly relevant and that is what engaged me more. The role of certain mafia gangs in political governance is a theme that deserves to be examined in a good movie. In the movie, the mafia-politician nexus is busted and, like in our great myths, virtue triumphs over vice. Such a triumph is an artistic requirement. Real life, however, follows the principle of entropy: chaos flourishes with vengeance. Lucifer is the real winner in real life. The title of the movie as well as a final dialogue from the eponymous hero sugg...

Empuraan and Ramayana

Maggie and I will be watching the Malayalam movie Empuraan tomorrow. The tickets are booked. The movie has created a lot of controversy in Kerala and the director has decided to impose no less than 17 censors on it himself. I want to watch it before the jingoistic scissors find its way to the movie. It is surprising that the people of Kerala took such exception to this movie when the same people had no problem with the utterly malicious and mendacious movie The Kerala Story (2023). [My post on that movie, which I didn’t watch, is here .] Empuraan is based partly on the Gujarat riots of 2002. The riots were real and the BJP’s role in it (Mr Modi’s, in fact) is well-known. So, Empuraan isn’t giving the audience any falsehood as The Kerala Story did. Moreover, The Kerala Story maligned the people of Kerala while Empuraan is about something that happened in the faraway Gujarat quite long ago. Why are the people of Kerala then upset with Empuraan ? Because it tells the truth, M...

Empuraan – Review

Revenge is an ancient theme in human narratives. Give a moral rationale for the revenge and make the antagonist look monstrously evil, then you have the material for a good work of art. Add to that some spices from contemporary politics and the recipe is quite right for a hit movie. This is what you get in the Malayalam movie, Empuraan , which is running full houses now despite the trenchant opposition to it from the emergent Hindutva forces in the state. First of all, I fail to understand why so much brouhaha was hollered by the Hindutvans [let me coin that word for sheer convenience] who managed to get some 3 minutes censored from the 3-hour movie. The movie doesn’t make any explicit mention of any of the existing Hindutva political parties or other organisations. On the other hand, Allahu Akbar is shouted menacingly by Islamic terrorists, albeit towards the end. True, the movie begins with an implicit reference to what happened in Gujarat in 2002 after the Godhra train burnin...