Bigotry: Adolf Hitler

"Don't buy from Jews" & "A good German doesn't buy from Jews" - Jews were made to carry those signboards


Bigotry rarely begins with violence. It begins with certainty. The certainty that I am right. The certainty that the other is wrong. And finally, the most dangerous of all, that the other does not deserve to exist as equal.

After World War I, Germany was left humiliated, wounded, and searching for meaning. Into this fragile psyche of a nation stepped Adolf Hitler, not merely as a politician, but as a storyteller. The narrative he offered was dangerously simple. Germany is a great nation, a great race, with a glorious ancient past, but now betrayed. Your suffering has a cause and that cause has a face. The face, Hitler told the Germans, was the Jew.

What Hitler said was not really new. The Germans did have problems with the Jews. But what Hitler did with those problems was new: he transmuted prejudice into purpose. And thus bigotry became a public policy in Germany.

The kind of bigotry that Hitler shaped in his country was not just an emotional reflex. It was systematised into a worldview. Hitler made bigotry a law. The Jews were stripped of citizenship – without even any nicety like India’s revision of electoral rolls or enactment of certain Acts like FCRA which look innocuous on  the surface.

The Nuremberg Laws of 1935 explicitly excluded Jews and other minorities from German citizenship and civil rights. Kristallnacht or the Night of Broken Glass and the Holocaust were natural outcomes soon. A whole big population of the country became traitors overnight.

Bigotry is a potent sociopolitical alchemist.

In just one night, some 7500 Jewish businesses and 1400 synagogues were destroyed. 30,000 Jews were sent to concentration camps. That night came to be known in history as Kristallnacht. These numbers would dwindle into insignificance soon when hundreds of thousands of Jews would be killed in the concentration camps.

A 15-year-old girl named Anne Frank died in one of those camps. Not knowing that her death was imminent, she had written earlier in her diary: “In spite of everything I still believe that people are really good at heart.”

One of the heartrending ironies of bigotry is that even as a nation dehumanises a people, the victims still cling to humanity.

Where Hitler perceived enemies, Anne saw human beings.

For Hitler and his Nazis, a neighbour was no longer a human being. He was a category. A classification. A problem to be dealt with.

When the Jewish synagogues burnt, the vast majority of Germans stayed silent. Some were afraid, some agreed, but most were just indifferent. A Jew who survived the concentration camp and went on to become a Nobel Peace laureate, Elie Wiesel, would write 20 years after Kristallnacht that “The opposite of love is not hate, it’s indifference” [in his book, Night].

Hitler and his devout followers used words such as vermin and disease for the Jews. Bigotry does that invariably: strip away humanity from the targeted population. Eliminating vermin and diseases is a duty of any conscientious citizen. Violence becomes duty in a bigoted nation.

Six million lives were soon extinguished. They were vermin, diseases, threats to the nation.

Was Hitler an anomaly? A lone figure of madness? If he were, I wouldn’t be writing this post now.

Hitler was not just an odd man out. He had a large number of followers. He was cheered enthusiastically. He was obeyed fanatically.

Yet, we have reason to be optimistic. For every Hitler, there is a Niemöller. Martin Niemöller [1892-1984] was a Lutheran pastor in Hitler’s bigoted country. He spent eight years in concentration camps, though he was not a Jew, though he belonged to Hitler’s camp by race and religion. He was in the concentration camp because he questioned Hitler’s bigotry. It is he who told us that our silence in the face of brutality against other communities will boomerang. “First they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out,” he wrote famously. “… Then they came for me – and there was no one left to speak for me.”



PS. This post is a part of Blogchatter A2Z Challenge 2026

Previous Post: Authority – Mandela

Tomorrow: Courage – Gandhi

Comments

  1. Writeups and movies around World War 2 and especially Nazi rules somehow draw me. This was a deep understanding of Bigotry and of course Hitler.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. One of the best novels on Hitler's Germany is Book Thief by Markus Zusak. When Death says, "I am haunted by humans," we are driven to reflect so much on our depravity in the face of our capacity for creating grandeur...

      Delete
  2. Hari OM
    Bravo for your B-word and how you explored it. Nicely gathered up and 'Bagged'! YAM xx

    ReplyDelete
  3. Sad nowadays it's getting normalised.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. In a country like India, it can lead to unforeseeable consequences.

      Delete
  4. The theme is well-worn. Yet, your treatment of it had its own freshness. Thank you. Hitler was not an aberration. But allowed to emerge and Germans wondered, after the war how it would have happened that Germany, the acme of thought and reason, could have allowed Hitler ti happen. The question is still valid..

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I chose this clichéd theme only because it's still in practice in our own familiar terrains.

      Delete
  5. The whole "problem with the Jews" doesn't really exist. I've never really understood why people were so threatened by them. The reason Germany had so many Jews at that time was because decades earlier Germany had been the safe haven for them. Germany didn't discriminate against them like other nations did. And then they turned on them, much like those in power in the US are turning on them now. For why? Just to have an other to rail against.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Exactly, the Jews were made the scapegoat.

      Germany's defeat in WWI was not because of any betrayal by Jews, as claimed by Hitler, but of military exhaustion, the entry of the US into the war, and the collapse of the allies.

      Hitler's racism was absurd and I don't need to say more on that. At best, Hitler knew Darwin's theories and how to distort them.

      Most historians will agree that Hitler's antisemitism was a tool used to provide a simple, singular enemy for a frustrated nation to unite against, allowing him to consolidate power. [Something similar is happening in my country now.]

      Delete
  6. I have always admired your write-ups Sir and this profound piece hints at so many unsettling things happening currently. The analogy from international events that you are trying to hint is being well delivered, Sir ! Bravo !

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm happy you got the undertones of my post. I really wish that a lot more people get that and do something about the situation.

      Delete
  7. As you have pointed out such incidents are not isolated incidents. Bigotry and racial hatred has continued to claim innocent victims throughout the ages. Unfortunate that we still come across many such cases in this so called twenty first century. More unfortunate is the fact that many such cases are either not reported or not highlighted.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Human nature is more amenable to such behaviors, it seems.

      Delete
  8. Both in states and center of India, every politician (or his training company) is trained with Hitler. It is easy to copy him.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hitler is the easiest historical figure to be "copied." Hatred and vengeance are so facile!

      Delete

Post a Comment

Recent Posts

Show more