Skip to main content

The God Business


In a relatively old Malayalam movie, Kizhakkan Pathrose, the protagonist is a criminal.  One day he goes to a Catholic priest who is involved in many charitable works and says, “I have committed a lot of crimes and caused much pain to many people.  I want to atone for it all by making a donation for noble causes.”  The priest accepts the cheque without saying a word.

“This is not atonement,” I blurted out while watching the movie a few minutes back on a TV channel.

“Why not?” asked Maggie, my wife, the only other person present in the room.

Courtesy: Internet
“Real atonement is only when the person gives up his criminal ways.  The rest is commerce.  This fellow is trying to buy atonement with money and the priest is his accomplice.”

Maggie was about to say something but suppressed it.  I did not succeed in making her speak.  I think she wanted to say that I was a silly idealist.

“Put God to work for you and maximise your potential in our divinely ordered capitalist system,” directed the High Priest of Positive Thinking, Norman Vincent Peale.  This is what the protagonist in the movie did.  This is what most religious believers do.  They trade with God: I pay you money and you sell me forgiveness!

In the Devil’s Dictionary, Ambrose Bierce defines the clergyman (priest, religious guru, etc) as “a man who understands the management of our spiritual affairs as a method of bettering his temporal ones.”

 As long as people understand God as a seller of forgiveness and religion as that God’s temporal agent, religion will remain a futile entity, though a commercially successful one.  


An atheist like George Santayana understood God and religion far, far better than any pious devotee when he said, “My atheism, like that of Spinoza, is true piety towards the universe and denies only gods fashioned by men in their own image to be servants of their human interests.”  True piety towards the universe is a highly refined level of consciousness which understands the meaning of kindness and courage, power and magnanimity, honesty and tenderness... People who have achieved that level of consciousness do not  need God or His/Her earthly agents and their hollow rituals.  The corollary to this maxim is that people who have not achieved that level of consciousness will not be rewarded by the rituals except for the psychological comfort and apparent permission to keep perpetrating the evils they have been doing.

Comments

  1. I always believe Human created Religion and not the other way round..But still why people are so obsessed with religion I fail to understand....

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Religion is an infantile need, friend. I said it in a different way in my last post. Most people today have a protracted childhood and religion fulfils that need with the INFINITE love of God.

      Delete
  2. the toon goes apt! :) religion speaks its language .. blame the manipulators who claim highest positions on behalf of Almighty and translate religion for vested interests!
    Faith in religion is restored through the sayings writing in several books ... deemed to be understood as God's Own Words.. but interpretation of the writings depend on the reader.
    Wish forgiveness could really be bought :)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Dear Jack, I used to call myself an agnostic. Now I'm a convinced ATHEIST, after having seen at close quarters how religion works. I refuse to accept any scriptures or their interpretations as meaningful. They are pure rubbish only meant to be manipulated by Machiavellian/Kautilian brains. I have seen it for years - in my early workplace too.

      Delete
  3. The toon like jack has mentioned is the synoposis of religion today. The write up of course is what defines the concept more deep. Religion should not be a way of forgiveness but of always showing the right path....

    Richa

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. People are simply using religion, Richa, just like they use the transport system or the mobile phone. While the transport and the mobile have some real benefits, religion offers none really! Except for the people who wield it as a weapon...

      Delete
  4. The unproductive society system of our nation :(

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yeah, religion helps to consume without producing by exploiting people's 'sewa' mentality.

      Delete
  5. True, religion is basically just another corrupt system in this world that is full of other corrupt systems.
    But it is also a beacon of hope for humanity, a shining light to look up to and gain strength from, in times of dire distress.
    So, two sided coin I think sir.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. But one side of the coin is too heavily loaded Brendan.

      Delete
  6. God - a seller of forgiveness! :)
    As long as humans are emotionally weak religion will rule.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. People refuse to raise the level of their consciousness - that's the problem, not emotional weakness.

      Delete
  7. Capitalism joins hands with religion-Christianity is now run like a business.
    I agree, repentance should come on the inside. Otherwise, all poor people would go to hell, and that's not how god intended it to be.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It's not just Christianity that's playing capitalist game now, Chaitanya. Every religion is involved in the game actively. In case you find any which is not, do tell me.

      Delete
  8. Welcome to the club! But, unfortunately for you and me, there is no club for atheists!

    I will add one thing. "True piety towards the universe is a highly refined level of consciousness which understands the meaning of kindness and courage, power and magnanimity, honesty and tenderness... " There is a slight difference in the way I would understand this. True piety can never reach a DESTINATION, which always remains undefined. You find TRUE PIETY only in the path one has chosen - that path is paved over with all that you said, "... kindness and courage, power and magnanimity, honesty and tenderness... " It is a voyage of incrementals.

    RE

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Kindness...etc are only some examples, Raghuram. There is no hierarchy really unless you take my level of consciousness as incremental.

      There is a saying in my mother tongue which means that the fool learns by experiences while the wise man learns through observation. I'm a fool. Too many experiences with religious people.

      Delete
    2. You have had too many experiences; now it is time for you to sit down, take in the scenery and enjoy - observe!

      What I meant to say was that in your actiuvities you just notice the next step, do not look farther ahead. That is the incremental I referred to. Movement is important, movement towards all that you mentioned. The ellipsis at the end indicates that what is said is a sub-set and not the whole set.

      RE

      Delete
  9. People will continue to sin as long as they believe that God will redeem them of all the pain they have caused on Earth.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Exactly. So it's better to eliminate God from human consciousness. It's better to teach men (and women, no doubt) that it is our duty to be 'good' whether there is a god or not.

      Delete
  10. Any idea or philosophy once institutionalized gets corrupted.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Since my childhood, I skipped God for one reason: The tiring rituals stretching my patience. Later a kind of meditation revealed me from the tedium. It gave me scientific reason for believing only in one's work. I was happy. Gradually, I could unravel many questions that lay buried in my mind since childhood. Religion could not answer them. Religion is incapable of answering any question of life. It only threatens and controls people. It is a monarch. It is imperial. It cannot celebrate any sort of logical freedom. It keeps people blind. It cannot lead anyone to attain superior wisdom except prescribing some do's and don'ts.

    What I say... If a person wants to atone for his mistakes or crimes, he or she has to own up to the mistake first and vow not to keep it or do it in future at any moment of time and in any situation. There the person is forgiven. After that even the victim of his crime cannot have right to pelt stone at him or her. If the victim takes revenge or torments the person even after giving up the crime, then the victim himself or herself is none other than another criminal who only waited for a legal chance to do crimes.

    Religion is such a criminal. It waits for persons to do crimes and then demands him or her to 'atone' for the crime by pleasing it in a favourable way, say gobbling money or wealth of the so called criminal! Now say, isn't religion another criminal?

    I don't condemn religion. I condemn it only for the standards fixed for it by men, I mean, the real criminals.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. As long as religion remains a commercial enterprise (charging money for various services, rituals, etc), it will fail to produce any real spiritual benefit. Make stringent laws against use of money in religion, and you will see 99% of the priests, swamis, gurus and the like leaving the profession.

      Delete
  12. Religion is not God... one may believe in religion, may not believe in God and the vice versa. What I feel is some thing different... humanity is above all religion and God. Do you duty first and yes, practice first then preach... Thats the motto...

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ayodhya: Kingdom of Sorrows

T he Sarayu carried more tears than water. Ayodhya was a sad kingdom. Dasaratha was a good king. He upheld dharma – justice and morality – as best as he could. The citizens were apparently happy. Then, one day, it all changed. One person is enough to change the destiny of a whole kingdom. Who was that one person? Some say it was Kaikeyi, one of the three official wives of Dasaratha. Some others say it was Manthara, Kaikeyi’s chief maid. Manthara was a hunchback. She was the caretaker of Kaikeyi right from the latter’s childhood; foster mother, so to say, because Kaikeyi had no mother. The absence of maternal influence can distort a girl child’s personality. With a foster mother like Manthara, the distortion can be really bad. Manthara was cunning, selfish, and morally ambiguous. A severe physical deformity can make one worse than all that. Manthara was as devious and manipulative as a woman could be in a men’s world. Add to that all the jealousy and ambition that insecure peo...

Abdullah’s Religion

O Abdulla Renowned Malayalam movie actor Mohanlal recently offered special prayers for Mammootty, another equally renowned actor of Kerala. The ritual was performed at Sabarimala temple, one of the supreme Hindu pilgrimage centres in Kerala. No one in Kerala found anything wrong in Mohanlal, a Hindu, praying for Mammootty, a Muslim, to a Hindu deity. Malayalis were concerned about Mammootty’s wellbeing and were relieved to know that the actor wasn’t suffering from anything as serious as it appeared. Except O Abdulla. Who is this Abdulla? I had never heard of him until he created an unsavoury controversy about a Hindu praying for a Muslim. This man’s Facebook profile describes him as: “Former Professor Islahiaya, Media Critic, Ex-Interpreter of Indian Ambassador, Founder Member MADHYAMAM.” He has 108K followers on FB. As I was reading Malayalam weekly this morning, I came to know that this Abdulla is a former member of Jamaat-e-Islami Hind Kerala , a fundamentalist organisation. ...

Bharata: The Ascetic King

Bharata is disillusioned yet again. His brother, Rama the ideal man, Maryada Purushottam , is making yet another grotesque demand. Sita Devi has to prove her purity now, years after the Agni Pariksha she arranged for herself long ago in Lanka itself. Now, when she has been living for years far away from Rama with her two sons Luva and Kusha in the paternal care of no less a saint than Valmiki himself! What has happened to Rama? Bharata sits on the bank of the Sarayu with tears welling up in his eyes. Give me an answer, Sarayu, he said. Sarayu accepted Bharata’s tears too. She was used to absorbing tears. How many times has Rama come and sat upon this very same bank and wept too? Life is sorrow, Sarayu muttered to Bharata. Even if you are royal descendants of divinity itself. Rama had brought the children Luva and Kusha to Ayodhya on the day of the Ashvamedha Yagna which he was conducting in order to reaffirm his sovereignty and legitimacy over his kingdom. He didn’t know they w...

Empuraan – Review

Revenge is an ancient theme in human narratives. Give a moral rationale for the revenge and make the antagonist look monstrously evil, then you have the material for a good work of art. Add to that some spices from contemporary politics and the recipe is quite right for a hit movie. This is what you get in the Malayalam movie, Empuraan , which is running full houses now despite the trenchant opposition to it from the emergent Hindutva forces in the state. First of all, I fail to understand why so much brouhaha was hollered by the Hindutvans [let me coin that word for sheer convenience] who managed to get some 3 minutes censored from the 3-hour movie. The movie doesn’t make any explicit mention of any of the existing Hindutva political parties or other organisations. On the other hand, Allahu Akbar is shouted menacingly by Islamic terrorists, albeit towards the end. True, the movie begins with an implicit reference to what happened in Gujarat in 2002 after the Godhra train burnin...

Empuraan and Ramayana

Maggie and I will be watching the Malayalam movie Empuraan tomorrow. The tickets are booked. The movie has created a lot of controversy in Kerala and the director has decided to impose no less than 17 censors on it himself. I want to watch it before the jingoistic scissors find its way to the movie. It is surprising that the people of Kerala took such exception to this movie when the same people had no problem with the utterly malicious and mendacious movie The Kerala Story (2023). [My post on that movie, which I didn’t watch, is here .] Empuraan is based partly on the Gujarat riots of 2002. The riots were real and the BJP’s role in it (Mr Modi’s, in fact) is well-known. So, Empuraan isn’t giving the audience any falsehood as The Kerala Story did. Moreover, The Kerala Story maligned the people of Kerala while Empuraan is about something that happened in the faraway Gujarat quite long ago. Why are the people of Kerala then upset with Empuraan ? Because it tells the truth, M...