Skip to main content

Militant Hinduism



Religious nationalism is more dangerous than religious fundamentalism because it plays with two identities: religious and national. All of a sudden people belonging to all religious faiths except that of the majority become enemies if not traitors. The five years of Mr Narendra Modi’s reign have converted India into what some observers have labelled as “a Republic of Hate”. Muslims, Christians and even Hindu Dalits have been the targets of violent attacks during the last five years.

Anyone who questions such attacks and intolerance is labelled as anti-national. The only true patriot in present India is a militant Hindu who carries the venom of hatred in his heart. The Prime Minister and his confidante Mr Amit Shah also express their hatred for the minority communities in their speeches and even go to the extent of making venomous statements against certain states and regions of the country which are populated by Muslims and Christians. Mr Modi’s utterance about Mr Rahul Gandhi’s decision to contest the elections from Kerala’s Wayanadu constituency ["Congress ke naamdaar ne microscope le kar bharat mein ek aisi seat khoji hai jahan par vo muqabala karne ki taakat rakh sake. Seat bhi aisi jahan par desh ki majority minority mein hai. (The Congress dynast went out with a microscope to look for a safe seat to contest and selected a seat where the majority is in minority)"] is just one example. Mr Shah went one up on that by declaring Wayanadu to be a Pakistan in India.

With such leaders at the helm of affairs, India need not hope for communal harmony. An American organisation, Open Doors, has listed India as the tenth most dangerous country for Christians. Three years ago, Humanists International described India as a “Nightmare for Minorities” and reported that “more than 600 known attacks” have taken place against Christians alone after Mr Modi came to power in 2014.


Attacks on Muslims and Dalits are perhaps even more rampant and are generally reported by the Indian media. Factchecker.in has reported that 90 percent of religion-based hate crimes in the last decade occurred after Mr Modi took office. The police seldom take action against the perpetrators of such violence. Instead the victims are further harassed by the police and government agencies.

A survey carried out by NDTV claims that “communally divisive language” in speeches by elected officials shot up nearly 500 percent between 2014 and 2018. 90 percent of those speeches were made by BJP leaders.

It is pertinent to think of what India will be if Mr Modi comes to power once more. The increasingly vitriolic language spoken by Modi and Shah indicates that India is going to witness more violence and bloodshed if the country does not exercise its franchise wisely in the ongoing Parliament elections.

Comments

  1. The basic trouble with our countrymen is that they are happy to be made fools by the selfish and the exploitative ones like the apex leaders of the govt. and the ruling political party. When one is ready to be fooled which cunning one would like to be a fool to abstain from doing it ? We discard wisdom and rationale while choosing our leaders and ultimately get those bad leaders whom we badly deserve. That's the perpetual irony of the Indian polity.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for expressing your views so candidly. These days, people are afraid to voice their sane views because of the reign of villainy.

      Delete
    2. It is indeed a sad state of affairs.The mainstream media has stopped/prevented from ? unbiased reporting and the judiciary has also complained of interference.

      Delete
    3. All institutions have been infiltrated by the government machinery. We are moving towards dictatorship.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Adventures of Toto as a comic strip

  'The Adventures of Toto' is an amusing story by Ruskin Bond. It is prescribed as a lesson in CBSE's English course for class 9. Maggie asked her students to do a project on some of the lessons and Femi George's work is what I would like to present here. Femi converted the story into a beautiful comic strip. Her work will speak for itself and let me present it below.  Femi George Student of Carmel Public School, Vazhakulam, Kerala Similar post: The Little Girl

The Little Girl

The Little Girl is a short story by Katherine Mansfield given in the class 9 English course of NCERT. Maggie gave an assignment to her students based on the story and one of her students, Athena Baby Sabu, presented a brilliant job. She converted the story into a delightful comic strip. Mansfield tells the story of Kezia who is the eponymous little girl. Kezia is scared of her father who wields a lot of control on the entire family. She is punished severely for an unwitting mistake which makes her even more scared of her father. Her grandmother is fond of her and is her emotional succour. The grandmother is away from home one day with Kezia's mother who is hospitalised. Kezia gets her usual nightmare and is terrified. There is no one at home to console her except her father from whom she does not expect any consolation. But the father rises to the occasion and lets the little girl sleep beside him that night. She rests her head on her father's chest and can feel his heart...

Are human systems repressive?

Salma I had never heard of Salma until she was sent to the Rajya Sabha as a Member of the Parliament by Tamil Nadu a couple of weeks back and a Malayalam weekly featured her on the cover with an interview. Salma’s story made me think on the nature of certain human systems and organisations including religion. Salma was born Rajathi Samsudeen. Marriage made her Rukiya, because her husband’s family didn’t think of Rajathi as a Muslim name. Salma is the pseudonym she chose as a writer. Salma’s life was always controlled by one system or another. Her religion and its ruthlessly patriarchal conventions determined the crests and troughs of her life’s waves. Her schooling ended the day she chose to watch a movie with a friend, another girl whose education was stopped too. They were in class 9. When Rajathi protested that her cousin, a boy, was also watching the same movie at the same time in the same cinema hall, her mother’s answer was, “He’s a boy; boys can do anything.” Rajathi was...

Modi’s Art of Censorship

One of the infinite ironies about Narendra Modi’s India is its flagrant censorship while claiming to be the most tolerant civilisation. A Guardian report today informs us that Arundhati Roy’s 2020 book, Azadi , is banned in Kashmir for promoting a “false narrative and secessionism.” Being a fan of Ms Roy’s rebellious spirit, I buy her books as they are published. I had reviewed this book ( Azadi ) back in 2020 when it was published. The Congress government that ruled India for a very long period, before Modi’s rhetoric mesmerised the Indian electorate, was highly flawed. Corruption ran in its every single vein. Yet it was far better than what Modi brought in its place. The glaring hypocrisy of the Congress was a glue that held India together, Ms Roy says in this censored book of hers. What she means to say is that though secularism was not practised sincerely or consistently the pretence of it acted as a binding force that maintained a kind of social and political equilibrium. T...

The Real Enemies of India

People in general are inclined to pass the blame on to others whatever the fault.  For example, we Indians love to blame the British for their alleged ‘divide-and-rule’ policy.  Did the British really divide India into Hindus and Muslims or did the Indians do it themselves?  Was there any unified entity called India in the first place before the British unified it? Having raised those questions, I’m going to commit a further sacrilege of quoting a British journalist-cum-historian.  In his magnum opus, India: a History , John Keay says that the “stock accusations of a wider Machiavellian intent to ‘divide and rule’ and to ‘stir up Hindu-Muslim animosity’” levelled against the British Raj made little sense when the freedom struggle was going on in India because there really was no unified India until the British unified it politically.  Communal divisions existed in India despite the political unification.  In fact, they existed even before the Briti...