Autocrats too many
I’m going to quote a few lines and passages from a
book I’m currently reading. See if you can guess which political leader is
being described. All the quotes refer to one and the same person and the
country that is being governed by him. I have replaced the name of the leader
with X.
· [The country’s] freedom of
the press was seriously undermined … not by state censorship but by X’s very
effective hacking of the media; he has proved to be both a master manipulator
and a very effective demagogue in the digital era.
· [X uses propaganda] to
foster controversies that divide the country and enhance mutual distrust and
hatred among fellow citizens. It seeks to convert politics into a particularly
brutal opposition between virtuous friends and evil enemies who must be stopped
at all costs and by any means necessary.
· X is a demagogue. We might
even say that he is straight out of central casting for demagogues: unruly,
uncouth, mendacious, dishonest, and cunning. His rise is a symptom of
constitutional rot and constitutional dysfunction.
· Although X ran as a
populist who promised to protect the working class from the depredations of globalization,
as soon as he [got power], he reversed course. His cabinet is full of wealthy individuals,
and many of his top advisors are from the very financial class that he excoriated
in his campaign.
All the quotes are from the
second chapter of the book, Can It Happen Here? Authoritarianism in
America, edited by Cass R Sunstein. All the chapters, written by
various experts, are about America. The leader referred to in all the quotes is
Donald Trump. And Not Narendra Modi, though they apply to any of our present autocrats
of whom there is no dearth.
I mentioned in my previous
post that I bought a pack of seven books from a Book Fair. The first was
Michelle Obama’s autobiography and I wrote about it yesterday, giving rather
undue attention to Donald Trump who makes his entry only towards the end of the
book. I did it on purpose. This book Can It Happen Here? is all about
Trump and it’s going to dominate my posts in the coming few days.
I bought this book with much
hesitation. First of all, it was published in 2018, when Trump had just
completed one year of his first term as President. Wasn’t it a bit too soon to
assess him in a book like this which appeared highly judgmental? But then I was
reminded of many of my friends turning against my critique of Narendra Modi in
the very first year of his Prime-Ministership. Though Modi became PM only in
2014, I was following him closely from 2002 when, as Chief Minister of Gujarat,
he had committed inhuman atrocities on a section of his own people. I realised
that the writers in this book knew Trump with similar familiarity. And so the
book stayed in my purchase.
The blurb whispered to me with some
witchy mischief that I was going to find too many parallels in those 17 essays –
parallels between Trump’s America and Modi’s India. “With the election of
Donald J. Trump,” the blurb read, “many people on both the left and right
feared that America’s 240-year-old grand experiment in democracy was coming to
an end…”
A few weeks before Modi ensconced
himself on the PM’s throne in 2014, I wrote
in this very same space: “Mr Modi displays the characteristics of an autocrat,
of a Fascist leader. He cannot tolerate dissidence, he does not respect
anyone who disagrees with him, and he can use the metaphorical chaiwala’s
language to shoot at his opponents.”
My posts were never generous to Modi –
even before he became PM. Was I biased as too many of my friends suggested? I
lost quite a few readers because of this perceived bias. Time proved me right, however. What does time say
about this book now? I was curious. I’ve just started reading it. If you’re
tickled, stay with me. There’s quite a lot of interesting stuff to come in the
coming days.
Tomorrow: Democracy
with a King who wins every election

Comments
Post a Comment