The Odyssey: A Prelude
Finally, I’m going to watch Christopher Nolan’s The
Odyssey. I never managed to read the classic though many
characters have fascinated me time and again. Odysseus stayed with me right
from my undergrad days when I read Lord Tennyson’s poem
on him. The aging king, as presented by Tennyson, rejects a quiet, sedentary
life in the palace. “I cannot rest from travel,” he says, “I will drink life to
the lees…” I loved that passion for life, for adventure and the quest for wisdom.
The line “To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield” has remained in my
memory from the college classroom up to this day.
I know well that Nolan’s Odysseus is
not Tennyson’s Ulysses. But I’m sure I’ll love the movie, a journey into the
psyche of a man who ruled the mythological milieu of an ancient civilisation.
How much of the wars that Odysseus
fought were historical? I don’t know.
Human beings were always driven by
predatory expansionist drives. They wanted to extract the wealth that belonged
to others. Even women could be part of that wealth. As Helen was in the case of
the Trojan War. But wasn’t that war originally more about trade route controls?
Troy sat near the entrance of the
Dardanelles/Hellespont. Controlling this strait allowed Troy to tax shipping
traffic between the Aegean Sea and the Black Sea, making it incredibly wealthy.
Quite many of the wars that took
place and still do in my own lifetime are about similar plunders of other
people’s properties.
The Viking incursions across Western
Europe, the raids of Mahmud of Ghazni into the Indian subcontinent, and the
expansion of the Mongol Empire all operated under a model where military
victory yielded immediate returns in gold, silver, livestock, and captured men.
And women too.
There were many Helens in history. More
in mythology, perhaps. Think of India’s own Sita. And Draupadi. When I watch The
Odyssey, will I be seeing another Sita of Lanka in Helen of Troy? I mean,
will I be watching the darkness of victory that every war produces inevitably?
Maybe, Nolan’s realistic lens will
divert my attention from history and mythology to the guilt that he gives to
the protagonist. I understand that unlike Homer’s hero whose hubris drives much
of the poem, Nolan’s Odysseus is weighed down by deep remorse over the
slaughter at Troy. Nolan’s hero learns that his cycle of violence cannot
restore his home, I’m told. I’d love that, perhaps, more than the epic heroism
founded on hubris.
Maybe, I’ll tell you more after
watching the movie. I’m excited anyway.

I am one upon you. I have watched the Movie already. Very perceptive Direction and Photography and Philosophical forays into myths.
ReplyDeleteMaggie and I are back home after watching it. I loved it for the same reasons you mention. I loved the conclusion especially: "We've broken the fragile bonds between men." I'm planning another post on that theme.
DeleteHari OM
ReplyDeletethere has been much debate at the 'woke' approach and the weakened female roles; that said, the point of any epic is that each ought take from the tale what pertains to themselves and let others find different if that is their path. Equally, in plays, books, or films, interpretation of the original source is as valid. The important thing is whether one was entertained and felt satisfied that the ticket price was worth paying! YAM xx
I'm not sure the female roles are weakened. Penelope is shown as rather helpless in a surrounding encroached on by male-suitors while her son Telemachus is too young and "weak" too to deal with it all. And the males there are not really "strong," they are crude, the typical political sort. Other women don't have much role to play unless we consider characters like Circe who appear briefly.
DeleteI liked the movie, though some scenes like Polyphemus eating the men repulsed me a bit.
I haven't seen it. I hope you like it.
ReplyDeleteYes, I liked it. It gave me more insights into the epics.
DeleteI've been hearing a lot about this release.
ReplyDeleteWorth watching, I'd say.
Delete