The Foreskin of Jesus
![]() |
| The Calcata church in Italy |
The foreskin of Jesus, removed when he was ritually
circumcised some 2000 plus years ago, was preserved as a holy relic in the
small parish church of Calcata in Italy till 1983. The Pope had long ago banned
the worship of the foreskin which was known among the Catholic devotees as the
Holy Prepuce. Despite the ban, the villagers of Calcata continued their annual
procession with the foreskin until 1983. Fed up with the silliness of the
people, the parish priest made an announcement in 1983: that the relic had been
stolen from a shoe box in his home.
Many theories were born about the
theft. It was incredible that a priest would keep such a holy object in a shoe
box under his bed, however much he feared thieves. The dominant speculation was
that the Vatican confiscated it to end centuries of mockery and theological embarrassment
surrounding the relic. Some people argued that it was stolen by black-market
antique collectors who were interested in the gem-studded medieval reliquary more
than the foreskin. Local rumours at the time tended to blame an occult group
though there was little evidence for it.
I read about this foreskin yesterday
in Jose Saramago’s novel, The Gospel According to Jesus Christ.
During one of my holidays from Delhi
in the early 2000s, I saw a Malayalam translation of Saramago’s novel in a
bookstore in my hometown. I was fascinated for two reasons: (1) the author was
a Nobel laureate and (2) the novel was about Jesus, a person who has dominated
my fancy ever since I was a little kid whose innocence had not been snatched yet.
When I read it back then, I didn’t
like it much because I couldn’t accept the supernatural elements like God,
devil, and angels who wandered in and out all the time. Now, a quarter of a
century later, I picked up the novel once again from my bookshelf. It seems
more interesting now. I’m ready to accept the supernatural as an inextricable part
of human narratives.
As I move on in that fictional world Saramago
creates in Judea of two millennia ago, I hope to bring you a lot of interesting
peeps here. Like Jesus’ foreskin.
The Catholic Church may find it
embarrassing. But the simple truth is that the ordinary folk love such objects
of worship. I live in a state of India that has some six million Christians including
my relatives. That’s about one-fifth of the state’s population. There are
hundreds of churches in Kerala dedicated to Saint George. There are thousands
of men named after the saint. Yet the simple fact is that the saint never existed.
He was just a legend, as imaginary as the unicorn. Nevertheless hundreds of thousands
of Christians seek his blessings through prayers and rituals. Many receive them
too.
That’s how religious faith works. It
can create reality out of nothing.
There was a time when I used to
wonder how people could worship gods who looked half elephant or full monkey. Now
I know. Faith doesn’t need reasons, facts, evidence. Faith is a hunger quite
analogous to the craving of the ocean to embrace the land: an instinctual,
restless longing to surrender to something vastly greater than itself, where
logic yields to the quiet majesty of the wave.

I'm not sure if that story is supposed to be farce or serious. Ah, the joys of religion.
ReplyDeleteThe people of Calcata did venerate what they believed was Jesus' foreskin. But the foreskin itself was sheer forgery.
DeleteGood to know this-Christine cmlk79.blogspot.com
DeleteGlad to see you here.
DeleteBeautiful last sentence…
ReplyDeleteIt's hard to explain religious faith without analogies.
DeleteReligion is the Spirit in the Spiritless Conditions. Sigh of the Oppressed Creature. Opium. Of the people. Marx
ReplyDeleteSometimes it becomes a joke too.
DeleteHari OM
ReplyDeleteFaith can be the fuel to drive the engine of creativity, positive action, acceptance, awareness, receptivity. It is serendiptious that your post and mine today resonate. By placing the worries of life onto the faith part of ourselves, we make space to move more freely in that life. Unburdening, wherevever and in whatever fashion, relieves and releases.
Problems arise, however, as per your example, when we no longer properly pray, but rather idolise and (dare I say) fetishise objects that have nothing whatsoever to do with faith. Ritual rather than supplication, show rather than true surrender... YAM xx
My observation is that most or at least a significant section of believers take religion as some kind of magic. You perform this ritual and you get this magical result. Hardly anyone gets the result asked for, but some good feeling descends and they think that's fair enough. The rest is God's will.
DeleteHowever, the present young generation is doing some serious thinking about this, it looks like. I have had a few former students discussing seriously on this issue with me personally.