Velankanni: History
The Basilica of Our Lady of Good Health at
Velankanni is one of the most important Catholic pilgrimage centres in Asia. It
is popularly called the Lourdes of the East. One man named Vidyasagar Gurumoorthy,
who claims to be a Hindu ascetic, has been making vociferous claims about the
Hindu roots of this church in the last few weeks. There’s absolutely no
historical evidence for his claim.
Velankanni was a small fishing/coastal village
which did not draw the attention of any historian or traveller until the
Portuguese arrived in the area. Nagapattinam was the nearest place of any
importance because of its seaport which had trade relations with the Romans and
Greeks for centuries.
Buddhist activity in Nagapattinam is well
documented. The Chudamani Vihara, a Buddhist monastery, was built or endowed in
the early 11th century with support from Chola king Rajaraja I and
the Srivijaya (Sailendra) rulers of Sumatra. There were also Hindu temples and
local goddess (Amman) worship along this stretch of coast. But Velankanni does
not find any mention in any recorded history, not even in Sangam literature and
early medieval Tamil sources. That is to say, Velankanni was a nondescript
place of absolutely no significance at that time. It is simply improbable that
any major temple existed there.
The history of Velankanni is particularly
interesting now because it brings together several strands of Indian history:
local religious traditions, the arrival of European missionaries, Portuguese
maritime activity, colonial rivalries, the development of Catholic Christianity
in Tamil Nadu, and the growth of popular pilgrimage.
Though the existence and historical
development of the Christian shrine are supported by documentary evidence, the
stories of Mary's apparitions and miracles belong primarily to religious oral
tradition. History and legend mingle seamlessly in Velankanni.
The Historical Setting
Velankanni is a coastal settlement in
present-day Nagapattinam district, on the Coromandel Coast of Tamil Nadu. The
region had a long history of maritime trade, fishing, cultural exchange and
religious diversity. Nagapattinam, a nearby port, was an important centre of
international commerce. Traders and sailors connected the Coromandel Coast with
Sri Lanka, Southeast Asia and other parts of the Indian Ocean.
Christianity had reached parts of the Tamil
coast long before the construction of the present basilica. The Portuguese
established themselves at Nagapattinam around 1520-1530, though their formal
commercial settlement developed later. In 1533, approximately 30 Portuguese
residents were reported in Velankanni. The community grew slowly, largely
through trade with Sri Lanka.
The Tamil Nadu government’s Nagapattinam
district history says that the Portuguese established their commercial centre
in 1554 and that Christianity began taking root in the area through their
presence.
However, according to the history published by
the Diocese of Thanjavur, Christianity existed in the region even before the
arrival of the Portuguese. This history refers to the Italian traveller
Ludovico de Varthema who visited Nagapattinam in 1505. Varthema recorded the
presence of indigenous Christians there. This means that Christianity in
Nagapattinam cannot simply be explained as something introduced by Portuguese
missionaries.
It should be remembered here that there were
much older Christian traditions in South India, particularly the communities
associated with ST Thomas Christianity on the Malabar Coast and the ancient
Christian tradition of Mylapore.
The Portuguese arrival in India began with
Vasco da Gama’s landing in 1498. Gama’s arrival at Calicut, now Kozhikode, on
20 May 1498 was one of the most consequential events in the history of the
Indian Ocean. It opened a direct sea route between Europe and India around the
Cape of Good Hope. It also initiated a period of Portuguese commercial
expansion, military intervention and missionary activity along India’s western
and eastern coasts.
The Portuguese presence eventually supported
the arrival of Franciscan and Jesuit missionaries in South India.
It is
important to note that the Portuguese did not arrive in an unknown or isolated
India. They entered a sophisticated commercial world in which Arab, Persian,
Gujarati, Malabari, Chinese and other merchants had traded for centuries. We
may also recall that direct trade relations between Rome and India began
shortly after Octavian (Augustus) annexed Egypt in 30 BCE. [Augustus is the
religious and political title Octavian assumed upon becoming Rome’s first
emperor.]
Indirect trade existed earlier via Ptolemaic
Egypt and Seleucid overland routes. Augustus’s conquest of the Ptolemaic
Kingdom gave Rome direct access to Red Sea ports like Berenike. Around the late
1st century BCE, Roman navigators mastered the seasonal monsoon
winds, allowing merchant fleets to sail straight across the Arabian Sea to the
western ports of India, most notably Muziris along the Malabar Coast of Kerala
and Arikamedu on the Coromandel Coast.
It is not improbable that Thomas, the disciple
of Jesus, took one of those ships and landed in Kerala, though there is no conclusive
historical evidence for it.
The simple truth is that history remains very vague
when we go back beyond 15th century Velankanni. Claims about Hindu
temples or any such structures are likely to be politically motivated rather than
founded on convincing evidence or even probability.
Tomorrow: Velankanni and Christian Missionaries
![]() |
| Vidyasagar Gurumoorthy |
PS. I’m taking an unusual personal interest in this matter merely
because I find it very distressing to see religious people behaving like venal
politicians. If religion becomes a cause for public strife and mutual hatred,
it has no place in human civilisation. People like Vidyasagar Gurumoorthy
are doing a historical disservice to Hinduism by making mendacious
claims on history. I’m not a religious believer. But religion has always
fascinated me as an interesting subject of study. The more I study it, the stronger
my disbelief becomes.


Comments
Post a Comment