One
of the phone calls that greeted me this New Year’s Day drove me to some serious
contemplation. The friend quoted the
example of Galileo who retracted his scientific theory before the religious
Inquisitors and later explained his action: “Science doesn’t need martyrs.”
My
meditation led me to the notion of freedom provided by the 17th
century philosopher, Spinoza. He argued
that we were not totally free. We are
controlled by certain inescapable laws of nature as well as our genetic makeup. Evil is also an essential part of nature. “The evil which ensues from evil deeds is not
therefore less to be feared because it comes of necessity;” said Spinoza, “whether
our actions are free or not, our motives still are hope and fear.”
Hope
for a better future; fear about the present situation. The martyr is not afraid for himself; his fear
is about the future of the society.
Martyrdom
need not be a virtue. To be really great is not to be placed above humanity,
ruling or controlling others, counsels Spinoza.
Real greatness lies in rising above the partialities and futilities of
uninformed desires, and ruling one’s self.
Desires
or passions drive human beings. Passion
for wealth, power, luxury, assets, fame… “A passion ceases to be a passion,” says Spinoza,
“as soon as we form a clear and distinct idea of it...” When we understand our passion adequately, it
becomes a virtue. All intelligent behaviour
– i.e., all reaction which arises from an understanding of the total situation –
is virtuous action. Spinoza even goes to
the extent of saying that there is no virtue but intelligence.
“Men
who are good by reason – i.e., men who, under the guidance of reason, seek what
is useful to them – desire nothing for themselves which they do not also desire
for the rest of mankind.” Spinoza’s
words.
Can
I invert that wisdom? We don’t live in
17th century anyway. If you
live in a society of human beings who do not desire for the rest of mankind
what they desire for themselves, use your reason and find your escape
route. What good would Galileo have done
had he accepted martyrdom for the sake of preserving his integrity? Visualise him in his given situation, of
course; it would be absurd to argue that integrity is immaterial. Intelligence is virtue. And Galileo was not acting without integrity;
he was acting with the virtue of intelligence.
I’m
convinced Spinoza is right even 337 years after his death.
Nice one Sir. Loved reading it, as always.
ReplyDeleteRegards
Sammya
Most welcome, Sammya. Life challenges us to become increasingly philosophical these days, it seems.
DeleteVery well written sir..
ReplyDeleteThanks, Maniparna.
Delete[ Smiles ] Your posts have always given me a lot to think about.
ReplyDeleteDo have yourself a wonderful 2014.
I'm happy to make you and possibly others think, Renard. Thinking people do much less harm than others :)
DeleteThanks for the good wishes. I'm in need of them.
“Men who are good by reason ...”... Spinoza’s words
ReplyDeleteEffective words!! Thanks for this article!
Thanks for encouraging me to write such articles, Bhargav.
DeleteSpinoza offers much to ponder about. Can anyone be good without "understanding"? Can "understanding" come only from reason? Well, I think, I should let you meditate on that. :)
a nice read. effective words. happy new year.
ReplyDeleteWish you too a Happy New Year, Amar. And thanks for the compliment.
DeleteInteresting. Have wanted to read Spinoza for long. But never got around to it. Same with Dewey and Thomas Moore.
ReplyDeleteYour choice is good, friend, though Dewey and Moore didn't enlighten me as much as Spinoza did. However, the rationalism of the latter too is far better than the ambivalence of our contemporary "intellectuals".
DeleteAs always very nicely written.Liked it.
ReplyDeleteThanks, Ankita. Glad to see you here with a comment.
DeleteVery nicely written :-) Happy new year :-)
ReplyDeleteThank you, wish you too a great year ahead.
DeleteI have new read philosophy but now I am thinking I might be missing out on something good!
ReplyDelete