Skip to main content

The Accidental Prime Minister



Book Review
 
Quite a contrast!
Let me start with a disclaimer. This is a book review and has nothing to do with the movie of the same name. I read a few reviews of the movie and each one trashes the movie as cheap propaganda for the right wing. The movie seems to be an attempt to denigrate Dr Manmohan Singh as well as the Congress Party, according to the reviews I read. The book, on the other hand, is a genuine attempt to understand Dr Singh as a person.

The author, Sanjaya Baru, was Dr Singh’s media adviser during UPA-1. He had very close associations with the Prime Minister if the book is to be believed. When the book was published in 2014, the Congress Party was displeased with it for obvious reasons. Sonia Gandhi and Rahul Gandhi are shown to be manipulators who did not let Dr Singh wield any real power during his second reign as PM.  The Prime Minister’s Office released a press release then labelling the book as mere fiction.

Baru carries conviction, however. There may be some exaggerations here and there. But the book comes across to the reader with a high degree of credibility. Baru admires Dr Singh’s “intellect, his humane persona, his gentle and civil conduct, his political instinct and his deep patriotism.” The book reveals these aspects of Dr Singh’s personality.

Baru shows us how Dr Singh managed to keep the power with him during UPA-1 but lost that power when he assumed the office for the second term. The focus of the book is on the first term, however. Baru was not the media adviser during the second term; he had left the job for “personal reasons”.  

“The world is not a morality play,” the book quotes Dr Singh. “The world’s political and economic system is a power play and those who have greater power use it to their advantage.” Dr Singh’s failure was he did not know how to use his power to his and the nation’s advantage. He let others pull the strings. His second term as Prime Minister reeked of scams and scandals because he did not wield his power properly. Personally he remained clean; no one could raise a finger against his personal integrity. The book shows how personal integrity is not enough in politics.

The book throws ample light on the personality of Dr Singh. He is an admirable person. Noble souls need not be successful politicians. Thus Dr Singh ends up as a tragic character fit for a Shakespearean history play. Baru’s book is able to fathom the depths of that great character and to that extent it is a great book. We also get some brilliant peeps into the dark corridors of power at the Centre.

I don’t like the cover of the book, however. Why on earth did Penguin have to put Anupam Kher on the cover of a book about Dr Manmohan Singh? That picture is totally out of place there. Kher and Dr Singh have nothing in common except that the former caricatured the latter in a substandard movie.



Featured post on IndiBlogger, the biggest community of Indian Bloggers



PS.  My review of Tharoor's book:

https://matheikal.blogspot.com/2019/01/the-paradoxical-prime-minister.html

Comments

  1. Good to know what originally written in the book.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Films often differ much from the book on which it is based especially if the director of the movie has a different political leaning.

      Delete
  2. Sounds interesting. We ought to know Dr. Singh better. What makes it better is that it's written by somebody who worked closely with him.

    When books turn into movies they tend to put these kind of covers. But it's really odd that they did that to a biographical book.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The book does portray Dr Singh realistically. I'd recommend it to anyone. The movie is quite another matter and the publisher stooped too low by putting the actor on the cover.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Country where humour died

Humour died a thousand deaths in India after May 2014. The reason – let me put it as someone put it on X.  The stand-up comedian Kunal Kamra called a politician some names like ‘traitor’ which made his audience laugh because they misunderstood it as a joke. Kunal Kamra has to explain the joke now in a court of justice. I hope his judge won’t be caught with crores of rupees of black money in his store room . India itself is the biggest joke now. Our courts of justice are huge jokes. Our universities are. Our temples, our textbooks, even our markets. Let alone our Parliament. I’m studying the Ramayana these days in detail because I’ve joined an A-to-Z blog challenge and my theme is Ramayana, as I wrote already in an earlier post . In order to understand the culture behind Ramayana, I even took the trouble to brush up my little knowledge of Sanskrit by attending a brief course. For proof, here’s part of a lesson in my handwriting.  The last day taught me some subhashit...

Lucifer and some reflections

Let me start with a disclaimer: this is not a review of the Malayalam movie, Lucifer . These are some thoughts that came to my mind as I watched the movie today. However, just to give an idea about the movie: it’s a good entertainer with an engaging plot, Bollywood style settings, superman type violence in which the hero decimates the villains with pomp and show, and a spicy dance that is neatly tucked into the terribly orgasmic climax of the plot. The theme is highly relevant and that is what engaged me more. The role of certain mafia gangs in political governance is a theme that deserves to be examined in a good movie. In the movie, the mafia-politician nexus is busted and, like in our great myths, virtue triumphs over vice. Such a triumph is an artistic requirement. Real life, however, follows the principle of entropy: chaos flourishes with vengeance. Lucifer is the real winner in real life. The title of the movie as well as a final dialogue from the eponymous hero sugg...

Abdullah’s Religion

O Abdulla Renowned Malayalam movie actor Mohanlal recently offered special prayers for Mammootty, another equally renowned actor of Kerala. The ritual was performed at Sabarimala temple, one of the supreme Hindu pilgrimage centres in Kerala. No one in Kerala found anything wrong in Mohanlal, a Hindu, praying for Mammootty, a Muslim, to a Hindu deity. Malayalis were concerned about Mammootty’s wellbeing and were relieved to know that the actor wasn’t suffering from anything as serious as it appeared. Except O Abdulla. Who is this Abdulla? I had never heard of him until he created an unsavoury controversy about a Hindu praying for a Muslim. This man’s Facebook profile describes him as: “Former Professor Islahiaya, Media Critic, Ex-Interpreter of Indian Ambassador, Founder Member MADHYAMAM.” He has 108K followers on FB. As I was reading Malayalam weekly this morning, I came to know that this Abdulla is a former member of Jamaat-e-Islami Hind Kerala , a fundamentalist organisation. ...

Empuraan and Ramayana

Maggie and I will be watching the Malayalam movie Empuraan tomorrow. The tickets are booked. The movie has created a lot of controversy in Kerala and the director has decided to impose no less than 17 censors on it himself. I want to watch it before the jingoistic scissors find its way to the movie. It is surprising that the people of Kerala took such exception to this movie when the same people had no problem with the utterly malicious and mendacious movie The Kerala Story (2023). [My post on that movie, which I didn’t watch, is here .] Empuraan is based partly on the Gujarat riots of 2002. The riots were real and the BJP’s role in it (Mr Modi’s, in fact) is well-known. So, Empuraan isn’t giving the audience any falsehood as The Kerala Story did. Moreover, The Kerala Story maligned the people of Kerala while Empuraan is about something that happened in the faraway Gujarat quite long ago. Why are the people of Kerala then upset with Empuraan ? Because it tells the truth, M...

Violence and Leaders

The latest issue of India Today magazine studies what it calls India’s Gross Domestic Behaviour (GDB). India is all poised to be an economic superpower. But what about its civic sense? Very poor, that’s what the study has found. Can GDP numbers and infrastructure projects alone determine a country’s development? Obviously, no. Will India be a really ‘developed’ country by 2030 although it may be $7-trillion economy by then? Again, no is the answer. India’s civic behaviour leaves a lot, lot to be desired. Ironically, the brand ambassador state of the country, Uttar Pradesh, is the worst on most parameters: civic behaviour, public safety, gender attitudes, and discrimination of various types. And UP is governed by a monk!  India Today Is there any correlation between the behaviour of a people and the values and principles displayed by their leaders? This is the question that arose in my mind as I read the India Today story. I put the question to ChatGPT. “Yes,” pat came the ...