Skip to main content

Seven Maids and a Prodigy


Madhav and family were on their usual weekend short trip when Ramya mentioned what their son’s math teacher had said during the PTA meeting of that day. ‘Rohan is a prodigy.’

‘After all, he’s my son,’ Madhav said proudly as he looked at his son’s reflection in the rear-view mirror of the car. He was a computer software engineer while Ramya was only a bank clerk. Since Ramya had no doubt about her part in Rohan’s birth, she did not consider it necessary to stake a claim to it.

Madhav decided to assess his eleven-year-old son’s prodigy. But he could not remember any mathematical puzzle. He never had the habit of reading anything. Even as a student, he had not read anything other than course books. Computer wizards don’t need to read Shakespeare, he used to say with some pride. The only riddle that came to his mind was one from a short play that was part of his English course at college. It was about some Chinese king and the seven slaves of a noble man.* He didn’t remember the story but decided to try his hand at formulating the riddle in his own way.

‘There was a very rich man who divided all his property among his three sons before his death.’

‘Didn’t he have daughters?’ Rohan asked.

The question took Madhav by surprise. But it was Ramya who answered Rohan. ‘Your dad is a male chauvinist.’

‘Male chauvinists don’t have daughters?’ Rohan asked. Ramya did not answer that.

‘This rich man didn’t have daughters,’ Madhav said. ‘But he had a lot of maids. Maid servants, you know. There were seven of them who were very special.’

‘Why special?’ Rohan asked.

‘They were specially trained in manners and etiquette.’

‘Like Mukesh Ambani’s servants,’ Rohan remarked.

‘Huh? What’s that?’ Madhav was quite surprised.

‘It was in yesterday’s news that Mukesh Ambani’s servants get a monthly salary of Rs 2 lakh because they are all specially trained to look after the 27-storey Antilia and its handful of occupants.’

Madhav was now convinced that his son was indeed a prodigy. There was no need to continue with the riddle.

‘Dad?’

‘Hmm.’

‘The riddle.’

‘Oh, ok. The rich man had divided everything appropriately in his will and his sons had no complaint about anything. But when it came to the maids, there was a problem.’

‘A riddle,’ Rohan corrected his dad.

‘Yeah, a riddle. The will said that the eldest son should be given half of the maids, while the second son was to get one-fourth of the total number of maids and the youngest was to get one-eighth.’

‘Odd number and even divisions,’ Rohan said. ‘A puzzle indeed.’

‘How to divide the maids? The youngest son wouldn’t even get one whole maid! One-eighth of seven is a fraction less than one, you know.’

‘Around 0.9,’ Rohan said.

‘Every son was very much interested in the maids, specially trained as they were. How to solve the problem?’

‘Dad,’ Rohan said calmly.

‘Hmm.’

‘Quite easy. Half plus one-fourth plus one-eighth doesn’t add up to one. One-eighth will remain extra. We can solve the riddle easily with that extra.’

‘How?’ The computer engineer’s brain didn’t work that way at all. He recalled the old story in the English class. The hero of that story solved the problem by adding his girlfriend to the maids to make their number 8 and then giving half (4), one-fourth (2), and one-eighth (1) of the maids as stipulated to the three sons. And the eighth one was left behind for himself of course. Everyone was happy and they all lived happily ever after.

‘Your hero was a male chauvinist too,’ Rohan said.

Ramya giggled though she didn’t really understand what was going on especially what Rohan had said about the extra one-eighth.

‘Your hero could have solved the problem without bringing his girlfriend in at all. He could have rounded of half of 7 to 4, one-fourth to 2, and one-eighth to 1. Every son will get more than what his arithmetic would promise and he would have no reason to complain.’

That’s quite true, Madhav thought. Ramya wondered why this kind of solutions didn’t work in banking. If it had, clients would be very pleased to get that extra rounding-off!

‘It was an English teacher who taught us this riddle,’ Madhav said. ‘That’s why the girlfriend and so on.’

‘But Dad?’

‘Hmm.’

‘We rounded off three-and-a-half to 4, 1.75 to 2, and 0.9 to 1.’

‘Right.’

‘That means we added half plus a quarter plus 0.1 in the deal. That is, about 0.85. Less than one. So, where did your hero’s full girlfriend come from?’

Madhav was flabbergasted. ‘Your son is indeed a prodigy,’ he said to Ramya.

‘I thought you said he’s your son,’ Ramya winked.

The prodigy was laughing loudly and so he did not hear what his parents were saying. He thought they were working on his riddle now.

* The reference is to a short play, The Seven Slaves, written by A. Ball.

 

 

 

 

 

Comments

  1. Hari OM
    That's the thing with figures (statistics), you can 'massage' 'em all sorts of ways! YAM xx

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. True as that is, this riddle is highly logical with some interesting and logical insights into maths.

      Delete
  2. I have never been that interested in Math, but this sure made me think a lot !

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It's simple but interesting. Fractions create a lot of problems. But if the leader has a vision, integration is simple 😊

      Delete
  3. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ayodhya: Kingdom of Sorrows

T he Sarayu carried more tears than water. Ayodhya was a sad kingdom. Dasaratha was a good king. He upheld dharma – justice and morality – as best as he could. The citizens were apparently happy. Then, one day, it all changed. One person is enough to change the destiny of a whole kingdom. Who was that one person? Some say it was Kaikeyi, one of the three official wives of Dasaratha. Some others say it was Manthara, Kaikeyi’s chief maid. Manthara was a hunchback. She was the caretaker of Kaikeyi right from the latter’s childhood; foster mother, so to say, because Kaikeyi had no mother. The absence of maternal influence can distort a girl child’s personality. With a foster mother like Manthara, the distortion can be really bad. Manthara was cunning, selfish, and morally ambiguous. A severe physical deformity can make one worse than all that. Manthara was as devious and manipulative as a woman could be in a men’s world. Add to that all the jealousy and ambition that insecure peo...

Abdullah’s Religion

O Abdulla Renowned Malayalam movie actor Mohanlal recently offered special prayers for Mammootty, another equally renowned actor of Kerala. The ritual was performed at Sabarimala temple, one of the supreme Hindu pilgrimage centres in Kerala. No one in Kerala found anything wrong in Mohanlal, a Hindu, praying for Mammootty, a Muslim, to a Hindu deity. Malayalis were concerned about Mammootty’s wellbeing and were relieved to know that the actor wasn’t suffering from anything as serious as it appeared. Except O Abdulla. Who is this Abdulla? I had never heard of him until he created an unsavoury controversy about a Hindu praying for a Muslim. This man’s Facebook profile describes him as: “Former Professor Islahiaya, Media Critic, Ex-Interpreter of Indian Ambassador, Founder Member MADHYAMAM.” He has 108K followers on FB. As I was reading Malayalam weekly this morning, I came to know that this Abdulla is a former member of Jamaat-e-Islami Hind Kerala , a fundamentalist organisation. ...

Lucifer and some reflections

Let me start with a disclaimer: this is not a review of the Malayalam movie, Lucifer . These are some thoughts that came to my mind as I watched the movie today. However, just to give an idea about the movie: it’s a good entertainer with an engaging plot, Bollywood style settings, superman type violence in which the hero decimates the villains with pomp and show, and a spicy dance that is neatly tucked into the terribly orgasmic climax of the plot. The theme is highly relevant and that is what engaged me more. The role of certain mafia gangs in political governance is a theme that deserves to be examined in a good movie. In the movie, the mafia-politician nexus is busted and, like in our great myths, virtue triumphs over vice. Such a triumph is an artistic requirement. Real life, however, follows the principle of entropy: chaos flourishes with vengeance. Lucifer is the real winner in real life. The title of the movie as well as a final dialogue from the eponymous hero sugg...

Empuraan and Ramayana

Maggie and I will be watching the Malayalam movie Empuraan tomorrow. The tickets are booked. The movie has created a lot of controversy in Kerala and the director has decided to impose no less than 17 censors on it himself. I want to watch it before the jingoistic scissors find its way to the movie. It is surprising that the people of Kerala took such exception to this movie when the same people had no problem with the utterly malicious and mendacious movie The Kerala Story (2023). [My post on that movie, which I didn’t watch, is here .] Empuraan is based partly on the Gujarat riots of 2002. The riots were real and the BJP’s role in it (Mr Modi’s, in fact) is well-known. So, Empuraan isn’t giving the audience any falsehood as The Kerala Story did. Moreover, The Kerala Story maligned the people of Kerala while Empuraan is about something that happened in the faraway Gujarat quite long ago. Why are the people of Kerala then upset with Empuraan ? Because it tells the truth, M...

Empuraan – Review

Revenge is an ancient theme in human narratives. Give a moral rationale for the revenge and make the antagonist look monstrously evil, then you have the material for a good work of art. Add to that some spices from contemporary politics and the recipe is quite right for a hit movie. This is what you get in the Malayalam movie, Empuraan , which is running full houses now despite the trenchant opposition to it from the emergent Hindutva forces in the state. First of all, I fail to understand why so much brouhaha was hollered by the Hindutvans [let me coin that word for sheer convenience] who managed to get some 3 minutes censored from the 3-hour movie. The movie doesn’t make any explicit mention of any of the existing Hindutva political parties or other organisations. On the other hand, Allahu Akbar is shouted menacingly by Islamic terrorists, albeit towards the end. True, the movie begins with an implicit reference to what happened in Gujarat in 2002 after the Godhra train burnin...