Skip to main content

Human markers on the moon

Notice that white bag on the left


India has taken Lord Shiva to the moon by naming Chandrayan’s landing point after him. Humans have left a lot of other things on the moon too. There is a lot of trash left on the moon by human missions: a whopping 181,000 kg. Quite a bit of that trash consists of what many crewless missions from space-exploring agencies left on the moon over many years. We have left a lot of other stinking waste too: human excreta and urine.

There are 96 bags full of human organic waste abandoned on the surface of the moon, mostly by the various missions of NASA. When the first man to land on the moon, Niel Armstrong, was asked what the white bag in some of his lunar photographs was, he was reluctant to answer. But Charles Duke, the Lunar Module pilot of the 1972 mission, admitted candidly that the astronauts could not carry such waste back to the earth for simple logistics reasons. A whole tank of urine and many bags full of solid waste had to be abandoned on the moon. Many other missions did the same.

Humans have a unique way of leaving their imprints wherever they go.

Scientists are now taking a renewed interest in that human organic waste on the moon. For scientific reasons, of course. Such wastes contain bacteria of many types. How did these bacteria fare on the moon in the last half a century? Science wants to know. The environment on the moon is not at all conducive to survival. There is radiation from the sun which is not blocked by any ozone layer. Lack of water and oxygen as well as other detrimental factors like extreme temperatures [from -170 to +100 degrees Celsius] will make it difficult for any life to go on. What happened to all those bacteria then? Did they survive? Did they flourish?  Or did they perish?

Did the Chandrayan-3 Rover stumble on some golf balls on the moon? They are there, the golf balls. Not because there was some ancient civilization there whose creatures played the game. Alan Shepard of NASA left them there in 1971. He had carried them because he wanted to create a new history by playing the game on the moon. The balls went out of his control, however.

Many astronauts who explored the moon in the past abandoned quite many things on the moon. Maybe, India’s Shiva Shakti will give a new, different power to the moon. After all, India’s Prime Minister is a man with a cosmic vision: he can take our gods to other galaxies too. One cosmos, one family, one god. Jai Hind.

PS. This post is a part of Blogchatter Half Marathon

Previous Post: Why was Donald Shimoda Killed?

Comments

  1. Wow. I did not know all that was left behind! So there's shit on the moon too! (sorry) it's funny. And oh no. Our God's are now there too and no bhakts to make sure they're safe... 👀 Ohhh dear.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Don't worry, our passionate PM will make sure that bhakts reach there in time to save the gods whom he will put there in the first place.

      Delete
  2. O, there is plenty of junk in space. I had also read an article on the dangers of spacecraft colliding with one another or even with the junk.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Traffic jam in space! The gods should take that seriously.

      Delete
  3. Hari OM
    There was a recent falling of space junk to earth in Australia... not happy with trashing the planet that gives us life, now we do it off planet... the sci-fi part of me imagines all those bacteria thriving in their various baggies waiting to monster whoever decides to open them! YAM xx

    ReplyDelete
  4. Don't show your hate towards one man with the prestigious Chandrayaan-3 mission

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 😊
      https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.indiatoday.in/amp/india/story/moon-chandrayaan-3-shiv-shakti-hindu-rashtra-hindu-seer-viral-video-2427373-2023-08-27

      Delete
    2. https://indianexpress.com/article/opinion/columns/chandrayaan-3-landing-muscular-nationalism-8913073/

      Delete
  5. After destroying earth man is happy to have found one more place to destroy!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Worse, some of us are demanding to make the moon a Hindu Rashtra.

      Delete
  6. Interesting post. So we can leave our smell wherever we go! I used to think that this world is a hell and that we would go to heaven after our life is over. After reading your post, I think that we can make heaven smelly too.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Adventures of Toto as a comic strip

  'The Adventures of Toto' is an amusing story by Ruskin Bond. It is prescribed as a lesson in CBSE's English course for class 9. Maggie asked her students to do a project on some of the lessons and Femi George's work is what I would like to present here. Femi converted the story into a beautiful comic strip. Her work will speak for itself and let me present it below.  Femi George Student of Carmel Public School, Vazhakulam, Kerala Similar post: The Little Girl

Joys of Onam and a reflection

Suppose that the whole universe were to be saved and made perfect and happy forever on just one condition: one single soul must suffer, alone, eternally. Would this be acceptable? Philosopher William James asked that in his 1891 book, The Moral Philosopher and the Moral Life . Please think about it once again and answer the question for yourself. You, as well as others, are going to live a life without a tinge of sorrow. Joyful existence. Life in Paradise. The only condition is that one person will take up all the sorrows of the universe on him-/herself and suffer – alone, eternally. What do you say? James’s answer is a firm no . “Not even a god would be justified in setting up such a scheme,” James asserted, knowing too well how the Bible justified a positive answer to his question. “It is expedient that one man should die for the people, so that the nation can be saved” [John 11:50]. Jesus was that one man in the Biblical vision of redemption. I was reading a Malayalam period...

India in Modi-Trap

That’s like harnessing a telescope to a Vedic chant and expecting the stars to spin closer. Illustration by Gemini AI A friend forwarded a WhatsApp message written by K Sahadevan, Malayalam writer and social activist. The central theme is a concern for science education and research in India. The writer bemoans the fact that in India science is in a prison conjured up by Narendra Modi. The message shocked me. I hadn’t been aware of many things mentioned therein. Modi is making use of Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan’s Centre for Study and Research in Indology for his nefarious purposes projected as efforts to “preserve and promote classical Indian knowledge systems [IKS]” which include Sanskrit, Ayurveda, Jyotisha (astrology), literature, philosophy, and ancient sciences and technology. The objective is to integrate science with spirituality and cultural values. That’s like harnessing a telescope to a Vedic chant and expecting the stars to spin closer. The IKS curricula have made umpteen r...

The Little Girl

The Little Girl is a short story by Katherine Mansfield given in the class 9 English course of NCERT. Maggie gave an assignment to her students based on the story and one of her students, Athena Baby Sabu, presented a brilliant job. She converted the story into a delightful comic strip. Mansfield tells the story of Kezia who is the eponymous little girl. Kezia is scared of her father who wields a lot of control on the entire family. She is punished severely for an unwitting mistake which makes her even more scared of her father. Her grandmother is fond of her and is her emotional succour. The grandmother is away from home one day with Kezia's mother who is hospitalised. Kezia gets her usual nightmare and is terrified. There is no one at home to console her except her father from whom she does not expect any consolation. But the father rises to the occasion and lets the little girl sleep beside him that night. She rests her head on her father's chest and can feel his heart...

The Real Enemies of India

People in general are inclined to pass the blame on to others whatever the fault.  For example, we Indians love to blame the British for their alleged ‘divide-and-rule’ policy.  Did the British really divide India into Hindus and Muslims or did the Indians do it themselves?  Was there any unified entity called India in the first place before the British unified it? Having raised those questions, I’m going to commit a further sacrilege of quoting a British journalist-cum-historian.  In his magnum opus, India: a History , John Keay says that the “stock accusations of a wider Machiavellian intent to ‘divide and rule’ and to ‘stir up Hindu-Muslim animosity’” levelled against the British Raj made little sense when the freedom struggle was going on in India because there really was no unified India until the British unified it politically.  Communal divisions existed in India despite the political unification.  In fact, they existed even before the Briti...