Teacher as Intellectual
![]() |
| Illustration by ChatGPT |
Towards the end of my teaching career – that is, just
a year back – teaching became more like a clerical job than an inspiring
intellectual’s. A teacher has to deal with quite a few records and files now
such as the daily lesson plans or weekly diaries, students’ cumulative record
cards, mark sheets, log book, homework and assignment record, project record…
Teaching is increasingly described
using the language of logistics: content delivery, learning outcomes, modules,
credits, rubrics… The classroom is a marketplace where the teacher brings a
cargo called the syllabus and delivers it like a courier.
Knowledge cannot be delivered like a
commodity. It is interpreted, questioned, resisted, re-shaped. It comes alive
through interaction between the teacher and the students and among the students
themselves. A recorded lecture can deliver content, a textbook can do that as
well, even AI can do that better than a teacher. But teaching is not delivery
of content. The moment we ask why this idea matters, how it connects, what
it excludes, whose voice is missing, we enter intellectual territory. That
is where a real teacher operates.
An intellectual teacher does not
merely explain what a text says, but why it says so, and what lies beneath its
silences. In literature, this can mean reading against the grain. In science,
it means questioning assumptions and ethical consequences. In history, it means
recognising the narratives shaped by power.
In such classrooms, creative and
dynamic learning takes place. Students do not just learn answers; they watch
how a mind works. They make their minds work to their fullest potential.
Education is not accumulation, as
this series said earlier in another
post. Education is orientation. Without context – social, historical, moral –
content becomes information, and information becomes disposable after the
examination. Orientation answers questions like:
·
What matters and why?
·
How do I make sense of what I see, read, and hear?
·
Where do I stand in relation to society, power, values, and
knowledge?
Information gives facts. Orientation gives direction –
clarity, perspective, and judgment.
An intellectual teacher cannot ever
be replaced by automation like AI. An intellectual responds to the moment, the
classroom mood, the unasked question, the ethical tension in the text. Teaching
then becomes a dialogue, not a transaction.
Students today live in a world
saturated with information but starved of personal interpretation. They do not
need more content. They need help in thinking clearly, reading sceptically,
listening generously, and arguing honestly. Only a teacher who thinks – who
reads widely, doubts openly, and reflects deeply – can invite students into
that intellectual life. Such teachers do not manufacture obedient learners.
They nurture responsible citizens.
PS. This is the 8th
post in a series on education.
Previous Post: Language and Politics of Exclusion

Comments
Post a Comment