Unexamined Faith
![]() |
| A trader of religion distributing the Gita |
My last post was: When
Religion Becomes a Weapon. It dealt with the malicious use of social media by
people who claim to be defenders of their religion and god(s). If social media
was their weapon in that post, scripture is in this.
Three decades ago, Tracey
Emin installed a work of art at an exhibition at the South London Gallery. She
called it Everyone I Have Ever Slept With 1963-1995. The British press
screamed about Tracey Emin’s scandalous new “exhibition of promiscuity.” But if
you actually went to the gallery, you wouldn’t find a painting or a scandalous photo.
You would find a small, ordinary camping tent sitting on the floor. To
see the artwork, you would have to physically lower yourself, crawl through the
zipped door, and sit on a mattress inside.
And what was inside? Lit by a single
hanging bulb, the interior walls were softly lined with 102 names hand-stitched
into the fabric. It wasn’t a libidinous shout; it was a quiet, claustrophobic
sanctuary of memory. The list of people Tracey Emin slept with contained names
of her own mother, grandmother, twin brother, and aborted foetuses.
The public that condemned her notorious
and rebellious hypersexuality hadn’t bothered to go in and check what her “Tent”
actually contained. They assumed that the list contained the names of 102 men
she had slept with. After all, she was a rebel artist who started sleeping with
older men right from the age of 13. But her present artwork was about the “intimacy
of sleep” (in Andrew Marr’s words).
Reading about Emin in Marr’s book on
the Second Elizabethan England, I was poked to draw an analogy between her
experience and what happens with religions today (at any time, in fact).
People judged and labelled Emin
without even bothering to check what her list of 102 contained. The same
happens with religion and scriptures. Believers hardly go in and experience
religion and hardly bother to read the scriptures, let alone reflect on them. And
so we have all this violence and fanaticism and what not, in the name of
religion.
If it is absurd to condemn a work of
art based entirely on its title, consider how we approach the ultimate text:
scripture. Across the globe, millions are ready to argue, fight, and even go to
war over books they have never actually read, let alone meditated upon.
The holy book is not a guide for
living today. It is a totem: a sacred object that can mean many things
including divinity and communal identity. Like a tribal badge. People don’t
read it and get enlightenment. Instead they brandish it like a flag to show
which ‘team’ they belong to.
Just as people judged Emin by a
single title, religious folks often rely on isolated, out-of-context soundbites
passed down by influencers or polarising leaders, completely ignoring the
overarching themes of compassion, justice, or mysticism.
The most terrible and shameful irony
is that people engage in ungodly behaviour (hatred, violence, abuse) to defend
a God whose core commandment in those very scriptures is love and humility.
If Emin's shrieking, moralistic
critics had done a little inquiry into her life, they would have come to know
about the sad background that made her what she became. She came from what Marr
calls “the down-at-heel seaside town of Margate.” She was a child of unmarried
parents. Her Turkish-Cypriot father had no less than 23 children whom he acknowledged,
and many others whom he didn’t know. Margate in the days of Emin’s childhood
was a place of fairgrounds, discos, cheap pubs and a great deal of underage
sex.
Emin wrote in her memoir later how
much she yearned to be “touched” by a loving man. Too many men touched
her – but only lust, no love.
Too many devotees touch religion.
Only fever of fervour, no experience of the divine.
![]() |
| Tracey Emin's 'Tent' |
![]() |
| Mail: tmatheikal@gmail.com |



An innocus, yet poignant experience. In the pioneering years of St John's Regional Seminary, Kondadaba, in the early 1990s, I happened to be occuotung the post of the Dean, of Studies and the Vice-Rector. Occasiinally, a bishop orv two used to step into my office. While seated in front of me, fascinated and inspired by the quote on the wall, behind my chair, sed to ask me for a pen and paper to not down the quote. As I would get up to comply with their request for the writing material, the name of the author of the quote would become visible to them. - Mao Tse Tung, the Chinese Communist Supremo. At the citing of that ominous name, they would decine the paper and the pen and would say... " Don't trouble yourself, Father. Let it be.. " At the name of Mao, the inspirational content of the quote evaporated.. And thst indeed was a Emin's Tent moment for me....
ReplyDeleteI can understand that. I remembered certain figures from my DB days as I read your anecdote with a wry smile. It isn't easy to find broadminded people among the religious!
DeleteThey are broadminded, until they get into authority and then they have to protect the institution. Human nakedness, gives way to the fig leaves of prudence and prudery. " God asked Adam, " Who told you were naked?" for they had lost their at homeless and abandon, with their nakedness.
ReplyDeleteWhat an interesting art exhibit. As one who has never read the Bible and who rolls her eyes at mentions of it, I don't think people quoting scripture hits me the way they hope it will.
ReplyDeleteI'm convinced only by what people do, not what they say - Bible, Quran, Gita, whatever.
DeleteI'm a fan of Tracey Emin, her art is honest, raw, and speaks volumes. But I wonder if the shoe was on the other foot. If a male did an exhibit of all the woman I slept with.
ReplyDeleteI came to know about her only ftom Marr's book. Her life fascinated me more than her work. You're right, there's admirable forthrightness in her.
DeleteHari OM
ReplyDeleteOf course, Tracey was at the mercy of euphemism... the ridiculous substitution of 'sleep' for sex in a sentence of "I slept with". Indeed, the lady is frank and would actually have said, 'had sex with' if that had been her intention. She played the viewers! I really like how you drew the analogy with how certain people extrapolate scripture and present so many misguided interpretations. YAM xx
(Blogger is really playing tricks and posts are going very astray - thanks for sending the link, no doubt this post will appear on my reader later today, or even tomorrow...sigh...)
I was beginning to miss you here.
DeleteToday a very interesting topic for all of you who read me, and rightly so. Sunny greetings, Andereja!
ReplyDelete