Believing and Knowing

 

Image by Copilot Designer AI

This is the 3rd part of a series on Beliefs. The argument so far.

Belief and trust are foundational to human survival and daily existence long before reason or critical thinking develop. A fundamental trust in the value of existence is essential for everyone to navigate and find meaning in the world.

Belief evolved as an essential cognitive survival mechanism that allowed early humans to make rapid decisions under life-threatening uncertainty rather than waiting for conclusive evidence.

While quick pattern recognition and predictive thinking originally protected our ancestors from danger, these same mental shortcuts can lead to cognitive biases—such as normalcy bias and denial during crises. Human anxiety and the emotional need for order frequently give rise to false beliefs, conspiracy theories, and scapegoating when reality becomes too overwhelming to process.

Part 1: We are born to believe

Part 2: Belief as a Survival Mechanism

And here's part 3:

Believing and Knowing

Belief accepts something as true even without sufficient evidence. The motive for such acceptance is usually a need for security, psychological comfort, meaning, and/or order. Knowledge, on the other hand, means having good reasons, evidence, or reliable justification for accepting something as true.

There was a time when millions of people believed that the Sun revolved around the Earth. The belief was sincere and widely shared. Yet it was false. The history of humanity is filled with beliefs later abandoned because better evidence emerged.

We live in a world where knowledge is not only abundant but also easily accessible. The internet has given humanity unprecedented access to knowledge. Never before have so many books, scientific papers, historical archives, and expert opinions been available literally at one’s fingertips. Yet the same technology that makes it possible has also unleashed an unprecedented flood of misinformation. Truth and falsehood now travel through the same channels, often dressed in equally convincing language.

What spreads most rapidly online is not necessarily what is true, but what is emotionally compelling. Rumours, conspiracy theories, sensational headlines, and fabricated stories exploit our fears, hopes, prejudices, and tribal loyalties. They acquire credibility before they are subjected to basic fundamental examination. Human beings are eager to believe what makes them feel more secure or what reinforces their previous beliefs, notions, and prejudices.

That is, people are moved less by what they know than by what they believe. Knowing usually requires patience, evidence, and the willingness to revise one’s conclusions. Belief, on the other hand, can inspire immediate action. Wars have been fought, revolutions ignited, elections decided, fortunes made and destroyed, and entire civilisations shaped – not by what people knew with certainty but by what they believed to be true.

Religion offers us perhaps the best illustration. Whether one regards religious beliefs as true or false, their influence on history is undeniable. Religions have inspired magnificent works of art, hospitals, universities, and movement for justice. They have also justified persecution, conflict, and intolerance. Their power lies not in empirical proof but in the capacity of shared beliefs to shape human behaviour on a vast scale.

The same principle applies to our personal lives. We choose friends because we believe they are trustworthy. We marry because we believe another person will remain faithful. We educate our children because we believe knowledge will improve their future. None of these beliefs can be demonstrated with absolute certainty, yet they guide some of the most important decisions we ever make.

Knowledge undoubtedly expands our understanding of the world. But belief determines how we live in it. Knowledge informs us; belief motivates us. Knowledge describes reality as we understand it; belief shapes the choices we make in response to that reality. Human history, therefore, is not merely a history of discoveries and conquests. It is, even more profoundly, a history of beliefs: their origins, their power, their persistence, and their consequences. 

***

With this 3rd part, I come to the end of the first chapter of a book I had envisaged on Belief. The book plan is temporarily shelved. This series will go on for a few more days – until you rather than I are bored to death with it. 😉

Personally, I lost faith in God as a young man and never succeeded in finding it again. I’ve often wondered whether it is because I didn’t acquire, as a child, what Erikson called ‘basic trust’ and Hans Kung modified as ‘fundamental trust’ [part 1]. This series is my way of probing my own inner demons as clearly as I am capable of. I’m glad to find more and more readers joining me day after day, though many choose to express their views via personal messages. 

This post is a part of Blogchatter Half Marathon 2.0

Comments

  1. Yes.... The autobiographical struggle as an undercurrent to your three-piece writing is very evident. And my memory flashed back to the time, I either suggested to you to read, Hans Kung's Does God Exist? or sent a Xeroxed version myself. Yes. Fundamental Trust and Pascal'sv Wager... Your pieces take me to my classes in Philosophical Theology and Philosophy of Knowledge. Sanda or Testimony is an accepted Pramana for all the Astika schools of Indian Thought. And I often find myself using an expression, I have coined myself: Trusting the Graciousness of Reality. Both the Cathedrals and the Crusades are matters of belief and not knowledge...

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Recent Posts

Show more