Believing and Knowing
![]() |
| Image by Copilot Designer AI |
This is the 3rd part of a
series on Beliefs. The argument so far.
Belief and trust are foundational to human survival and daily
existence long before reason or critical thinking develop. A fundamental trust
in the value of existence is essential for everyone to navigate and find
meaning in the world.
Belief evolved as an essential cognitive survival
mechanism that allowed early humans to make rapid decisions under
life-threatening uncertainty rather than waiting for conclusive evidence.
While quick pattern recognition and predictive
thinking originally protected our ancestors from danger, these same mental
shortcuts can lead to cognitive biases—such as normalcy bias and denial during
crises. Human anxiety and the emotional need for order frequently give rise to
false beliefs, conspiracy theories, and scapegoating when reality becomes too
overwhelming to process.
Part 1: We
are born to believe
Part 2: Belief
as a Survival Mechanism
And here's part 3:
Believing and Knowing
Belief accepts something as true even
without sufficient evidence. The motive for such acceptance is usually a need
for security, psychological comfort, meaning, and/or order. Knowledge, on the
other hand, means having good reasons, evidence, or reliable justification for
accepting something as true.
There was a time when
millions of people believed that the Sun revolved around the Earth. The belief
was sincere and widely shared. Yet it was false. The history of humanity is
filled with beliefs later abandoned because better evidence emerged.
We live in a world where
knowledge is not only abundant but also easily accessible. The internet has
given humanity unprecedented access to knowledge. Never before have so many
books, scientific papers, historical archives, and expert opinions been available
literally at one’s fingertips. Yet the same technology that makes it possible
has also unleashed an unprecedented flood of misinformation. Truth and
falsehood now travel through the same channels, often dressed in equally
convincing language.
What spreads most rapidly
online is not necessarily what is true, but what is emotionally compelling.
Rumours, conspiracy theories, sensational headlines, and fabricated stories
exploit our fears, hopes, prejudices, and tribal loyalties. They acquire
credibility before they are subjected to basic fundamental examination. Human
beings are eager to believe what makes them feel more secure or what reinforces
their previous beliefs, notions, and prejudices.
That is, people are moved less by what
they know than by what they believe. Knowing usually requires
patience, evidence, and the willingness to revise one’s conclusions. Belief, on
the other hand, can inspire immediate action. Wars have been fought,
revolutions ignited, elections decided, fortunes made and destroyed, and entire
civilisations shaped – not by what people knew with certainty but by what they
believed to be true.
Religion offers us perhaps
the best illustration. Whether one regards religious beliefs as true or false,
their influence on history is undeniable. Religions have inspired magnificent
works of art, hospitals, universities, and movement for justice. They have also
justified persecution, conflict, and intolerance. Their power lies not in
empirical proof but in the capacity of shared beliefs to shape human behaviour
on a vast scale.
The same principle applies
to our personal lives. We choose friends because we believe they are
trustworthy. We marry because we believe another person will remain faithful.
We educate our children because we believe knowledge will improve their future.
None of these beliefs can be demonstrated with absolute certainty, yet they
guide some of the most important decisions we ever make.
Knowledge undoubtedly
expands our understanding of the world. But belief determines how we live in
it. Knowledge informs us; belief motivates us. Knowledge describes reality
as we understand it; belief shapes the choices we make in response to that
reality. Human history, therefore, is not merely a history of discoveries
and conquests. It is, even more profoundly, a history of beliefs: their
origins, their power, their persistence, and their consequences.
***
With this 3rd part, I come to the end of
the first chapter of a book I had envisaged on Belief. The book plan is
temporarily shelved. This series will go on for a few more days – until you rather
than I are bored to death with it. 😉
Personally, I lost faith in God as a young man and
never succeeded in finding it again. I’ve often wondered whether it is because I didn’t
acquire, as a child, what Erikson called ‘basic trust’ and Hans Kung modified
as ‘fundamental trust’ [part 1]. This series is my way of probing my own inner
demons as clearly as I am capable of. I’m glad to find more and more readers
joining me day after day, though many choose to express their views via personal
messages.
This post is a part of Blogchatter Half Marathon 2.0

Yes.... The autobiographical struggle as an undercurrent to your three-piece writing is very evident. And my memory flashed back to the time, I either suggested to you to read, Hans Kung's Does God Exist? or sent a Xeroxed version myself. Yes. Fundamental Trust and Pascal'sv Wager... Your pieces take me to my classes in Philosophical Theology and Philosophy of Knowledge. Sanda or Testimony is an accepted Pramana for all the Astika schools of Indian Thought. And I often find myself using an expression, I have coined myself: Trusting the Graciousness of Reality. Both the Cathedrals and the Crusades are matters of belief and not knowledge...
ReplyDeleteSabda
ReplyDelete