Skip to main content

Bliss

Image courtesy: Redorbit


Bliss it was that Santiago experienced when he returned home with the skeleton of the huge marlin fish that he had caught with much difficulty after 84 days of bad luck.  Santiago is the eponymous old man in Hemingway’s classical novel, The Old Man and the Sea.  Bad luck haunted him like a vindictive demon for 84 days.  He couldn’t catch any fish.  But Santiago was not one to give up.  On the eighty-fifth day, he succeeds in hooking the huge marlin.  However, he could only bring home the skeleton of that fish as sharks attacked it incessantly all along the way back.  Santiago did what he could to fight the sharks.  He had dreamt of selling the fish at a high price.  He knew that the people who would eat the fish were unworthy of its greatness. 

There was only the skeleton remaining by the time the old man reached ashore.  “But man is not made for defeat,” as Santiago tells us.  “A man can be destroyed but not defeated.”

Santiago’s bliss was the reward for his indefatigable spirit which knew to challenge destiny.  He refused to toe the line and run in the prescribed track.  He chose to explore the uncharted waters that lay “out too far.”  He was the luckless man, according to other people.  But he knew well that his “big fish must be somewhere” and he got it by leaving the conventional routes.

If you follow the beaten tracks, you will perform the regular rituals and get the familiar idols.  Remember that the most brutal acts of violence were perpetrated in the name of those rituals and idols.  All those who discovered their personal bliss were people who moved out of the beaten tracks.  The world thought them crazy. 

Be crazy if you want to arrive at your personal bliss, your own paradise.

PS. Written for #BlogchatterA2Z


Comments

  1. A man can be destroyed, but not defeated. - Fabulous sentiment.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That's how Hemingway was. Tragically, however, he defeated himself in the end. He committed suicide.

      Delete
  2. Can't agree more. A fabulous piece indeed.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Nothing can give more happiness than achieving a personal milestone and being vindicated....What the world then thinks is not important

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. As always, love the way you deliveries the message with a story

      Delete
    2. Thank you, friend. Feel nice to know that you are enjoying these posts.

      Delete
  4. I am loving the way you are telling the stories!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Adventures of Toto as a comic strip

  'The Adventures of Toto' is an amusing story by Ruskin Bond. It is prescribed as a lesson in CBSE's English course for class 9. Maggie asked her students to do a project on some of the lessons and Femi George's work is what I would like to present here. Femi converted the story into a beautiful comic strip. Her work will speak for itself and let me present it below.  Femi George Student of Carmel Public School, Vazhakulam, Kerala Similar post: The Little Girl

The Ugly Duckling

Source: Acting Company A. A. Milne’s one-act play, The Ugly Duckling , acquired a classical status because of the hearty humour used to present a profound theme. The King and the Queen are worried because their daughter Camilla is too ugly to get a suitor. In spite of all the devious strategies employed by the King and his Chancellor, the princess remained unmarried. Camilla was blessed with a unique beauty by her two godmothers but no one could see any beauty in her physical appearance. She has an exquisitely beautiful character. What use is character? The King asks. The play is an answer to that question. Character plays the most crucial role in our moral science books and traditional rhetoric, religious scriptures and homilies. When it comes to practical life, we look for other things such as wealth, social rank, physical looks, and so on. As the King says in this play, “If a girl is beautiful, it is easy to assume that she has, tucked away inside her, an equally beauti...

Helpless Gods

Illustration by Gemini Six decades ago, Kerala’s beloved poet Vayalar Ramavarma sang about gods that don’t open their eyes, don’t know joy or sorrow, but are mere clay idols. The movie that carried the song was a hit in Kerala in the late 1960s. I was only seven when the movie was released. The impact of the song, like many others composed by the same poet, sank into me a little later as I grew up. Our gods are quite useless; they are little more than narcissists who demand fresh and fragrant flowers only to fling them when they wither. Six decades after Kerala’s poet questioned the potency of gods, the Chief Justice of India had a shoe flung at him by a lawyer for the same thing: questioning the worth of gods. The lawyer was demanding the replacement of a damaged idol of god Vishnu and the Chief Justice wondered why gods couldn’t take care of themselves since they are omnipotent. The lawyer flung his shoe at the Chief Justice to prove his devotion to a god. From Vayalar of 196...

The Real Enemies of India

People in general are inclined to pass the blame on to others whatever the fault.  For example, we Indians love to blame the British for their alleged ‘divide-and-rule’ policy.  Did the British really divide India into Hindus and Muslims or did the Indians do it themselves?  Was there any unified entity called India in the first place before the British unified it? Having raised those questions, I’m going to commit a further sacrilege of quoting a British journalist-cum-historian.  In his magnum opus, India: a History , John Keay says that the “stock accusations of a wider Machiavellian intent to ‘divide and rule’ and to ‘stir up Hindu-Muslim animosity’” levelled against the British Raj made little sense when the freedom struggle was going on in India because there really was no unified India until the British unified it politically.  Communal divisions existed in India despite the political unification.  In fact, they existed even before the Briti...

Our gods must have died laughing

A friend forwarded a video clip this morning. It is an extract from a speech that celebrated Malayalam movie actor Sreenivasan delivered years ago. In the year 1984, Sreenivasan decided to marry the woman he was in love with. But his career in movies had just started and so he hadn’t made much money. Knowing his financial condition, another actor, Innocent, gave him Rs 400. Innocent wasn’t doing well either in the profession. “Alice’s bangle,” Innocent said. He had pawned or sold his wife’s bangle to get that amount for his friend. Then Sreenivasan went to Mammootty, who eventually became Malayalam’s superstar, to request for help. Mammootty gave him Rs 2000. Citing the goodness of the two men, Sreenivasan said that the wedding necklace ( mangalsutra ) he put ceremoniously around the neck of his Hindu wife was funded by a Christian (Innocent) and a Muslim (Mammootty). “What does religion matter?” Sreenivasan asks in the video. “You either refuse to believe in any or believe in a...