Skip to main content

Characters in novels



Characters are what fascinate me the most in a novel. They must belong to our own planet in the first place. Then they must be complex enough to be of some interest to me. Their problems must have some similarities, even if remote, with mine or other ordinary people’s. Their pursuits must belong to the same world that I inhabit. They must breathe the same air that I breathe even if the degree of pollution varies. They must have dreams and nightmares that kick at the ghosts within me.

I find it difficult to enjoy eminent contemporary writers like Salman Rushdie and Arundhati Roy [The Ministry of Utmost Happiness, I mean] because their characters belong to some other planet apparently. Rushdie’s latest protagonist, Quichotte, is “a travelling man of Indian origin, advancing years and retreating mental powers,” in love with TV shows. He devours “morning shows, daytime shows, late-night talk shows, soaps, situation comedies, Lifetime Movies, hospital dramas, police series, vampire and zombie serials, the dramas of housewives from Atlanta, New Jersey, Beverly Hills and New York, the romances and quarrels of hotel-fortune princesses and self-style shahs, the cavortings of individuals made famous by happy nudities, the fifteen minutes of fame accorded to young persons with large social media followings on account of their plastic-surgery acquisition of a third breast or their post-rib-removal figures that mimicked the impossible shape of the Mattel company’s Barbie doll…” That list is seemingly endless. And the whole thing, the entire novel, is very clever too.

I admit that the world has become too bizarre to have normal characters in fiction who can portray today’s life convincingly. But I have become outdated, I think, and hence I find those old characters more fascinating.

Ms Roy’s protagonist who lives “in the graveyard like a tree” is closer to my world and hence of more interest to me. The crows and bats with which the protagonist shares habitat are also familiar to me. I can understand the metaphorical graveyards in Roy’s novel: a graveyard in Delhi that is converted into the Jannat Guest House by the protagonist and the Jannat of Kashmir converted into a conglomerate of graveyards by Delhi. Very clever, again. But it is not cleverness that I look for in novels.

I prefer the ordinary mortals of the old novels. A student of mine brought her personal copy of Margaret Mitchell’s Gone With the Wind when I told her I hadn’t read it nor watched the movie. While reading it, this thought about characterisation struck me. Mitchell is splendid at creating characters that enchant us. I love the way she presents her characters.

Here is Ellen O’Hara, for example. “She would have been a strikingly beautiful woman had there been any glow in her eyes, any responsive warmth in her smile or any spontaneity in her voice that fell with gentle melody on the ears of her family and her servants. She spoke in the soft slurring voice of the coastal Georgian, liquid of vowels, kind to consonants and with the barest trace of French accent. It was a voice never raised in command to a servant or reproof to a child but a voice that was obeyed instantly at Tara, where her husband’s blustering and roaring were quietly disregarded.” So real, so human, and, most importantly, so poetic.

I love conversations like this: “Love isn’t enough to make a successful marriage when two people are as different as we are. You would want all of a man, Scarlett, his body, his heart, his soul, his thoughts. And if you did not have them, you would be miserable. And I couldn’t give you all of me. I couldn’t give all of me to anyone. And I would not want all of your mind and your soul. And you would be hurt, and then you would come to hate me – how bitterly! You would hate the books I read and the music I loved, because they took me away from you even for a moment.”

Gone with the Wind is the story of that Scarlett whose love is as demanding as a god’s. What a character! And what a way to describe that character! Well, this is just a sample. I love every page of this book. I can’t say that about any novel of Rushdie that I have read. Nor the two novels of Roy. Or many other supereminent contemporary writers.

This is about my likes and choices, not about the merits and demerits of any of these writers. I know that I am not worthy to untie the shoelaces of these writers.

 

Comments

  1. Hari OM
    It is a valid point you make, however. Does storytelling have to be fantastical and all the time sub-political? Surely the best of stories are those told simply, in a manner to which we can connect and through which, ultimately, those same philosphical points can be made? YAM xx

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Good story tellers don't require so many technical stunts to tell the story. I guess it's a matter of the intellectual complexity of the writer rather than the imaginative skills that comes into play in these new novels. Moreover, i think today's writers are not in touch with the ordinary mortals since they live in different worlds altogether.

      Delete
  2. Noted about the Gone with the wind. I added it to my wish list. Thank you.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You're welcome.
      Gone with the Wind may not be a literary classic but it's pop classic.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Adventures of Toto as a comic strip

  'The Adventures of Toto' is an amusing story by Ruskin Bond. It is prescribed as a lesson in CBSE's English course for class 9. Maggie asked her students to do a project on some of the lessons and Femi George's work is what I would like to present here. Femi converted the story into a beautiful comic strip. Her work will speak for itself and let me present it below.  Femi George Student of Carmel Public School, Vazhakulam, Kerala Similar post: The Little Girl

The Little Girl

The Little Girl is a short story by Katherine Mansfield given in the class 9 English course of NCERT. Maggie gave an assignment to her students based on the story and one of her students, Athena Baby Sabu, presented a brilliant job. She converted the story into a delightful comic strip. Mansfield tells the story of Kezia who is the eponymous little girl. Kezia is scared of her father who wields a lot of control on the entire family. She is punished severely for an unwitting mistake which makes her even more scared of her father. Her grandmother is fond of her and is her emotional succour. The grandmother is away from home one day with Kezia's mother who is hospitalised. Kezia gets her usual nightmare and is terrified. There is no one at home to console her except her father from whom she does not expect any consolation. But the father rises to the occasion and lets the little girl sleep beside him that night. She rests her head on her father's chest and can feel his heart...

India in Modi-Trap

That’s like harnessing a telescope to a Vedic chant and expecting the stars to spin closer. Illustration by Gemini AI A friend forwarded a WhatsApp message written by K Sahadevan, Malayalam writer and social activist. The central theme is a concern for science education and research in India. The writer bemoans the fact that in India science is in a prison conjured up by Narendra Modi. The message shocked me. I hadn’t been aware of many things mentioned therein. Modi is making use of Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan’s Centre for Study and Research in Indology for his nefarious purposes projected as efforts to “preserve and promote classical Indian knowledge systems [IKS]” which include Sanskrit, Ayurveda, Jyotisha (astrology), literature, philosophy, and ancient sciences and technology. The objective is to integrate science with spirituality and cultural values. That’s like harnessing a telescope to a Vedic chant and expecting the stars to spin closer. The IKS curricula have made umpteen r...

Two Women and Their Frustrations

Illustration by Gemini AI Nora and Millie are two unforgettable women in literature. Both are frustrated with their married life, though Nora’s frustration is a late experience. How they deal with their personal situations is worth a deep study. One redeems herself while the other destroys herself as well as her husband. Nora is the protagonist of Henrik Ibsen’s play, A Doll’s House , and Millie is her counterpart in Terence Rattigan’s play, The Browning Version . [The links take you to the respective text.] Personal frustration leads one to growth into an enlightened selfhood while it embitters the other. Nora’s story is emancipatory and Millie’s is destructive. Nora questions patriarchal oppression and liberates herself from it with equanimity, while Millie is trapped in a meaningless relationship. Since I have summarised these plays in earlier posts, now I’m moving on to a discussion on the enlightening contrasts between these two characters. If you’re interested in the plot ...

The Real Enemies of India

People in general are inclined to pass the blame on to others whatever the fault.  For example, we Indians love to blame the British for their alleged ‘divide-and-rule’ policy.  Did the British really divide India into Hindus and Muslims or did the Indians do it themselves?  Was there any unified entity called India in the first place before the British unified it? Having raised those questions, I’m going to commit a further sacrilege of quoting a British journalist-cum-historian.  In his magnum opus, India: a History , John Keay says that the “stock accusations of a wider Machiavellian intent to ‘divide and rule’ and to ‘stir up Hindu-Muslim animosity’” levelled against the British Raj made little sense when the freedom struggle was going on in India because there really was no unified India until the British unified it politically.  Communal divisions existed in India despite the political unification.  In fact, they existed even before the Briti...