Skip to main content

The Great Indian Circus


A student of mine recommended me a movie the other day: Jana Gana Mana, a Malayalam movie released recently. Since the student insisted that I’d love it, I took the trouble to subscribe to Netflix in order to watch it. I was more interested in knowing whether the student had really assessed my tastes rightly than in the movie itself. I appreciate the student’s assessment now.

Jana Gana Mana raises many pertinent questions. Let me bring a few of them here.

1.     Does the law of the country ensure justice?

Not in India anyway. Not in present India for sure. Here justice is what certain powers decide as just and true. Innocent students with youthful aspirations become villains in present India while hardcore criminals are the legislators. The judges in our courts are court poets. In a country where people who were buried centuries ago are disinterred for the sake of adding glamour to the present emperor by way of contrast (glitter versus skeleton), in a country where a Chief Justice accused of sexual offences is promoted as a member of the upper house of the Parliament by none less than the Prime Minister, in a country where honesty is imprisoned again and again day after day, do you expect justice in the courts of law? Law is not justice, asserts this movie loudly and boldly. Explicitly. Laws are made by criminals. Justice is not a word in the lexicon of criminals who rule a country where a rape takes place every 15 minutes. Metaphorical rapes by the government take place here every second.

2.     Does the media bring us the truth?

The media is all about sensationalism, asserts the movie. Even before the post mortem is conducted on the body of a murdered woman, the media decides that she was raped before being killed. When a beautiful woman is killed, a rape adds colours to the death as far as media is concerned. Sensationalism. And the ratings that come with it. Indian media is little more than that.

I must say that Indian media today is worse than that. It is a slave. It is nothing more than a faithful dog that wags its tail to please the master who will otherwise send his armies (ED, CBI, IT, and what not) to raid the premises. The media is a joke today. The buffoon in the Great Indian Circus. The Ring Master occasionally trims his beard when his mirror threatens him with an answer like the one received by the fairy queen in Snow White’s story. And Snow Whites perish in the emperor’s dungeons. The sequel to this movie can consider this point. It must be pointed out that this movie makes fun of our present Emperor’s penchant for foreign goods while promoting a slogan like ‘Make in India’.

3.     What is politics ultimately about?

Power. What else. And how does the present regime maintain that power? By manipulating people’s emotions. You can get power in any democracy by doing good to the people. But doing good is not easy in a big country like India where people still love to copulate to populate. It’s way too easy to manipulate the emotions of people in order to win their votes. If you bring the gods into that game successfully, victory is decidedly yours. Manipulation of emotions.

If we can ban the note, we can ban the vote too. The movie says that explicitly. The warning is that dictatorship is not far. But India will accept dictatorship too. Because the country has been enslaved emotionally. With divine support!

4.     A milch cow called people

Once you have hoodwinked the people into believing that you are the saviour of their nation, their religion, their caste, etc, people become your slaves. You can be a bloody leech and suck their blood forever. Put taxes on everything including the fire in their belly. People will still shout slogans for you. People are cows. Give them the cow as the holiest entity and there you are! Gung-ho! Jai Sri ….

PS. This is obviously not a review of the movie. Not even a critique. Just my ravings. I love the student who assessed my tastes so well.

Comments

  1. It is a bold gripping movie that discusses some important matters affecting the country.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes. The climax became a bit too intricate and theatrical. But i enjoyed it through and through. It is bold indeed. If it were in Hindi, it would have been banned.

      Delete
  2. Not yet watch Jana Gana Mana , Thanks for your post on the film. Hope soon watch the film.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Justice delayed is justice denied. No judge is punished for delayed justice. One judge was punished for quick justice.
    Media is business. They want to make money. Play safe. When ruling party changes switch side.
    Politics is for power. Service is euphemism for power.
    Winning election is game of numbers. BJP calculates they can win with Hindu votes. Others do not matter. When they lose they try defections. If money does not work, use CBI, ED, ITD.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That's a precise summary of what the movie conveys.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ayodhya: Kingdom of Sorrows

T he Sarayu carried more tears than water. Ayodhya was a sad kingdom. Dasaratha was a good king. He upheld dharma – justice and morality – as best as he could. The citizens were apparently happy. Then, one day, it all changed. One person is enough to change the destiny of a whole kingdom. Who was that one person? Some say it was Kaikeyi, one of the three official wives of Dasaratha. Some others say it was Manthara, Kaikeyi’s chief maid. Manthara was a hunchback. She was the caretaker of Kaikeyi right from the latter’s childhood; foster mother, so to say, because Kaikeyi had no mother. The absence of maternal influence can distort a girl child’s personality. With a foster mother like Manthara, the distortion can be really bad. Manthara was cunning, selfish, and morally ambiguous. A severe physical deformity can make one worse than all that. Manthara was as devious and manipulative as a woman could be in a men’s world. Add to that all the jealousy and ambition that insecure peo...

Abdullah’s Religion

O Abdulla Renowned Malayalam movie actor Mohanlal recently offered special prayers for Mammootty, another equally renowned actor of Kerala. The ritual was performed at Sabarimala temple, one of the supreme Hindu pilgrimage centres in Kerala. No one in Kerala found anything wrong in Mohanlal, a Hindu, praying for Mammootty, a Muslim, to a Hindu deity. Malayalis were concerned about Mammootty’s wellbeing and were relieved to know that the actor wasn’t suffering from anything as serious as it appeared. Except O Abdulla. Who is this Abdulla? I had never heard of him until he created an unsavoury controversy about a Hindu praying for a Muslim. This man’s Facebook profile describes him as: “Former Professor Islahiaya, Media Critic, Ex-Interpreter of Indian Ambassador, Founder Member MADHYAMAM.” He has 108K followers on FB. As I was reading Malayalam weekly this morning, I came to know that this Abdulla is a former member of Jamaat-e-Islami Hind Kerala , a fundamentalist organisation. ...

Lucifer and some reflections

Let me start with a disclaimer: this is not a review of the Malayalam movie, Lucifer . These are some thoughts that came to my mind as I watched the movie today. However, just to give an idea about the movie: it’s a good entertainer with an engaging plot, Bollywood style settings, superman type violence in which the hero decimates the villains with pomp and show, and a spicy dance that is neatly tucked into the terribly orgasmic climax of the plot. The theme is highly relevant and that is what engaged me more. The role of certain mafia gangs in political governance is a theme that deserves to be examined in a good movie. In the movie, the mafia-politician nexus is busted and, like in our great myths, virtue triumphs over vice. Such a triumph is an artistic requirement. Real life, however, follows the principle of entropy: chaos flourishes with vengeance. Lucifer is the real winner in real life. The title of the movie as well as a final dialogue from the eponymous hero sugg...

Empuraan and Ramayana

Maggie and I will be watching the Malayalam movie Empuraan tomorrow. The tickets are booked. The movie has created a lot of controversy in Kerala and the director has decided to impose no less than 17 censors on it himself. I want to watch it before the jingoistic scissors find its way to the movie. It is surprising that the people of Kerala took such exception to this movie when the same people had no problem with the utterly malicious and mendacious movie The Kerala Story (2023). [My post on that movie, which I didn’t watch, is here .] Empuraan is based partly on the Gujarat riots of 2002. The riots were real and the BJP’s role in it (Mr Modi’s, in fact) is well-known. So, Empuraan isn’t giving the audience any falsehood as The Kerala Story did. Moreover, The Kerala Story maligned the people of Kerala while Empuraan is about something that happened in the faraway Gujarat quite long ago. Why are the people of Kerala then upset with Empuraan ? Because it tells the truth, M...

Empuraan – Review

Revenge is an ancient theme in human narratives. Give a moral rationale for the revenge and make the antagonist look monstrously evil, then you have the material for a good work of art. Add to that some spices from contemporary politics and the recipe is quite right for a hit movie. This is what you get in the Malayalam movie, Empuraan , which is running full houses now despite the trenchant opposition to it from the emergent Hindutva forces in the state. First of all, I fail to understand why so much brouhaha was hollered by the Hindutvans [let me coin that word for sheer convenience] who managed to get some 3 minutes censored from the 3-hour movie. The movie doesn’t make any explicit mention of any of the existing Hindutva political parties or other organisations. On the other hand, Allahu Akbar is shouted menacingly by Islamic terrorists, albeit towards the end. True, the movie begins with an implicit reference to what happened in Gujarat in 2002 after the Godhra train burnin...