Skip to main content

Wildlife and Sustainable living


‘Assessment Report on the Sustainable Use of Wild Species’ is the result of a long research by about 300 social and natural scientists from across the world. The study points out that billions of people worldwide rely on about 50,000 wild species for food, energy, medicine and income. 33,000 species are plants and fungi; 7,500 are fish and aquatic creatures; and 9,000 are amphibians, insects, reptiles, birds and mammals. About 10,000 species are used directly for human food. All these facts underscore the importance of wild life and the necessity for its sustainable use.

The tribal people of India have always had their own traditional ways for preserving the forests and wild life. They have always been aware of the simple truth that forests are not fragile entities to be conserved through patronage from above. Forests are life itself. Caring for them is not a strategical and legal affair. You can’t preserve the forests merely by making certain laws as we can understand easily by looking at what has happened (and is happening now) in India. Caring for forests is an intuitive and holistic process as always understood by the tribal people who lived in harmony with forests.

The present government of India is selling the country’s forests to the corporate sector in the name of development. The Modi government cocks a snook at the world’s efforts to implement practices of sustainable living and sustainable use of resources including wild life. The Forest Conservation Rules of 2022 are totally against the spirit of the Sustainable Development Goals set by the UNO. According to this new set of regulations, the union government may permit the clearance of a forest without first informing its residents. This is diametrically opposed to the earlier provision that the local people and grama sabhas would be consulted first before any forestland is taken over for development purposes.

Now, with the new regulation put in place by the Modi government, the Centre, without consulting the state governments and the people affected, can hand over forestlands to the corporate sector. The earlier regulation – The Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers Act, 2006 – was a historic and progressive law which conferred land and livelihood rights to Adivasi, Dalit and other families living in forest areas. The new regulation makes it all too easy for the corporate sector to invade India’s forests armed with a simple signature from the Union government.

We know who are going to benefit from this new regulation when we remember that large forest areas of Odisha, Chhattisgarh and Jharkhand have been taken over for mining by the Vedanta group which is notorious for environmentally hazardous activities.

What the latest regulation does is to dispossess hundreds of thousands of forest dwellers from their lands or make them squatters on their own lands. As Arundhati Roy wrote many years ago in a different context, “Of the tens of millions of internally displaced people, refugees of India’s ‘progress’, the great majority are tribal people. When the government begins to talk of tribal welfare, it's time to worry.”

Now, by elevating a tribal woman as the President of India – a first of the kind – the Modi government is talking of tribal welfare and we need to worry really. One hope is that Ms Droupadi Murmu is a woman who refused to sign the Chhotanagpur Tenancy Act proposed by the BJP government when she was the governor of Jharkhand. True, she stood by the tribal people more out of political expediency than principles. Nevertheless, she showed the courage to stand against her own party’s policies. Let us hope she won’t be as docile and pliable a President as her predecessor was. Let us hope that at least the tribal people of India will get their due with her actions and initiatives. Let us hope that sustainable use of the wildlife will get a boost under her leadership.

As responsible citizens, each one of us should gather the courage to protest certain regulations of the government if they go against the interests of the country and its potential for sustainable living.

PS. This post is part of Blogchatter’s CauseAChatter.

 

Comments

  1. Hari OM
    I have come to accept that to be a politician at all - even the best of them if any such still remain in this world - means there will be an agenda and even if that agenda be 'noble', the machinery of government (all governments) seems to ensure all principles dissolve... YAM xx

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Just watched a Malayalam movie 'Janaganamana' which raises some of these questions - government agenda being a prominent one. Hope to write a post on that tomorrow.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ayodhya: Kingdom of Sorrows

T he Sarayu carried more tears than water. Ayodhya was a sad kingdom. Dasaratha was a good king. He upheld dharma – justice and morality – as best as he could. The citizens were apparently happy. Then, one day, it all changed. One person is enough to change the destiny of a whole kingdom. Who was that one person? Some say it was Kaikeyi, one of the three official wives of Dasaratha. Some others say it was Manthara, Kaikeyi’s chief maid. Manthara was a hunchback. She was the caretaker of Kaikeyi right from the latter’s childhood; foster mother, so to say, because Kaikeyi had no mother. The absence of maternal influence can distort a girl child’s personality. With a foster mother like Manthara, the distortion can be really bad. Manthara was cunning, selfish, and morally ambiguous. A severe physical deformity can make one worse than all that. Manthara was as devious and manipulative as a woman could be in a men’s world. Add to that all the jealousy and ambition that insecure peo...

Abdullah’s Religion

O Abdulla Renowned Malayalam movie actor Mohanlal recently offered special prayers for Mammootty, another equally renowned actor of Kerala. The ritual was performed at Sabarimala temple, one of the supreme Hindu pilgrimage centres in Kerala. No one in Kerala found anything wrong in Mohanlal, a Hindu, praying for Mammootty, a Muslim, to a Hindu deity. Malayalis were concerned about Mammootty’s wellbeing and were relieved to know that the actor wasn’t suffering from anything as serious as it appeared. Except O Abdulla. Who is this Abdulla? I had never heard of him until he created an unsavoury controversy about a Hindu praying for a Muslim. This man’s Facebook profile describes him as: “Former Professor Islahiaya, Media Critic, Ex-Interpreter of Indian Ambassador, Founder Member MADHYAMAM.” He has 108K followers on FB. As I was reading Malayalam weekly this morning, I came to know that this Abdulla is a former member of Jamaat-e-Islami Hind Kerala , a fundamentalist organisation. ...

Lucifer and some reflections

Let me start with a disclaimer: this is not a review of the Malayalam movie, Lucifer . These are some thoughts that came to my mind as I watched the movie today. However, just to give an idea about the movie: it’s a good entertainer with an engaging plot, Bollywood style settings, superman type violence in which the hero decimates the villains with pomp and show, and a spicy dance that is neatly tucked into the terribly orgasmic climax of the plot. The theme is highly relevant and that is what engaged me more. The role of certain mafia gangs in political governance is a theme that deserves to be examined in a good movie. In the movie, the mafia-politician nexus is busted and, like in our great myths, virtue triumphs over vice. Such a triumph is an artistic requirement. Real life, however, follows the principle of entropy: chaos flourishes with vengeance. Lucifer is the real winner in real life. The title of the movie as well as a final dialogue from the eponymous hero sugg...

Empuraan and Ramayana

Maggie and I will be watching the Malayalam movie Empuraan tomorrow. The tickets are booked. The movie has created a lot of controversy in Kerala and the director has decided to impose no less than 17 censors on it himself. I want to watch it before the jingoistic scissors find its way to the movie. It is surprising that the people of Kerala took such exception to this movie when the same people had no problem with the utterly malicious and mendacious movie The Kerala Story (2023). [My post on that movie, which I didn’t watch, is here .] Empuraan is based partly on the Gujarat riots of 2002. The riots were real and the BJP’s role in it (Mr Modi’s, in fact) is well-known. So, Empuraan isn’t giving the audience any falsehood as The Kerala Story did. Moreover, The Kerala Story maligned the people of Kerala while Empuraan is about something that happened in the faraway Gujarat quite long ago. Why are the people of Kerala then upset with Empuraan ? Because it tells the truth, M...

Empuraan – Review

Revenge is an ancient theme in human narratives. Give a moral rationale for the revenge and make the antagonist look monstrously evil, then you have the material for a good work of art. Add to that some spices from contemporary politics and the recipe is quite right for a hit movie. This is what you get in the Malayalam movie, Empuraan , which is running full houses now despite the trenchant opposition to it from the emergent Hindutva forces in the state. First of all, I fail to understand why so much brouhaha was hollered by the Hindutvans [let me coin that word for sheer convenience] who managed to get some 3 minutes censored from the 3-hour movie. The movie doesn’t make any explicit mention of any of the existing Hindutva political parties or other organisations. On the other hand, Allahu Akbar is shouted menacingly by Islamic terrorists, albeit towards the end. True, the movie begins with an implicit reference to what happened in Gujarat in 2002 after the Godhra train burnin...