Skip to main content

Hate Politics

Illustration by Copilot


Hatred is what dominates the social media in India. It has been going on for many years now. A lot of violence is perpetrated by the ruling party’s own men. One of the most recent instances of venom spewed out by none other than Mithun Chakraborty would shake any sensible person. But the right wing of India is celebrating it. Seventy-four-year-old Chakraborty threatened to chop the people of a particular minority community into pieces. The Home Minister Amit Shah was sitting on the stage with a smile when the threat was issued openly.

A few days back, a video clip showing a right-winger denying food to a Muslim woman because she refused to chant ‘Jai Sri Ram’ dominated the social media. What kind of charity is it that is founded on hatred?

If you go through the social media for a while, you will be astounded by the surfeit of hatred there. Why do a people who form the vast majority of a country hate a small minority so much? Hatred usually comes from some form of insecurity. Why would 80% of the population feel threatened by the other 20%? That too, when the entire political power, government organisations and agencies, judiciary, education system… all are in the majority community’s control! Most perplexingly, why would a government itself support violence against a particular community?

There are a lot of images on the social media now which show similarities between Modi and Hitler. The implied connection is that like Hitler Modi is driven by hatred of a particular religious community. There are ample utterances made by Modi in the past to justify that implication. But the question still remains: why such hatred, especially since Modi and his party are driven by religion primarily?

What use is any religion if it engenders so much hatred and violence? Isn’t religion supposed to make us gentle, kind, humane? At least basically ethical?

I have been observing a lot of right-wing people in India in the past few years. Some of these people call themselves Yogis, Godmen, Gurus, and so on. But their actions [Karma] are far more venal than those of some hardcore criminals. Their hearts are devilishly wicked. Why has it come to this? This is what I am trying to understand. Why are villains being glorified and angels being vilified?

By ‘angels’ I mean certain good people who died or are dying in custody – like Prof G N Saibaba and Fr Stan Swamy.

I have no answers to that question and will be obliged to anyone who can help me with answers. Why does a whole nation support a bunch of villainous people who pretend to be saintly heroes? In the meanwhile, as I wait for answers, I shall be reading Saibaba’s poems: Why Do You Fear My Way So Much? Poems and Letters from Prison. 


Top post on Blogchatter

Comments

  1. Hari Om
    All good questions and concerns. I am no more able to provide an answer than you...YAM xx

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Answers are difficult. Or maybe they're too obvious.

      Delete
  2. That seems to be the way of late. Did the rise of social media bring out the right wing? Or is this just part of the normal cycle of civilization? By that, I mean that it seems like this fear-mongering and scapegoating of groups seems to bubble up every so often (like 100 years ago), and a new generation has to throw it off. Or attempt to. We've got similar issues, and it's like these people who follow that viewpoint just revel in being terrible.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Social media brings the hatred as well as protests against it to the public. But you're right, this sort of hatred and violence always existed. Some reformation happens once in a while.

      Delete
  3. To the power crazy politicians religion is nothing but a means to achieve/retain power at the cost of humanity. Right wingers are on the rise all over the world as it is much easier to bait people on the issue of religion than any practical reason.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Right-wingism has become a fad now. Ironically, however, there's more migration and miscegenation. There's hope, it means.

      Delete
  4. Very timely post. Tolerance is out of religious scriptures now and politics is gory.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Adventures of Toto as a comic strip

  'The Adventures of Toto' is an amusing story by Ruskin Bond. It is prescribed as a lesson in CBSE's English course for class 9. Maggie asked her students to do a project on some of the lessons and Femi George's work is what I would like to present here. Femi converted the story into a beautiful comic strip. Her work will speak for itself and let me present it below.  Femi George Student of Carmel Public School, Vazhakulam, Kerala Similar post: The Little Girl

Whose Rama?

Book Review Title: Whose Rama? [Malayalam] Author: T S Syamkumar Publisher: D C Books, Kerala Pages: 352 Rama may be an incarnation of God Vishnu, but is he as noble a man [ Maryada Purushottam ] as he is projected to be by certain sections of Hindus? This is the theme of Dr Syamkumar’s book, written in Malayalam. There is no English translation available yet. Rama is a creation of the Brahmins, asserts the author of this book. The Ramayana upholds the unjust caste system created by Brahmins for their own wellbeing. Everyone else exists for the sake of the Brahmin wellbeing. If the Kshatriyas are given the role of rulers, it is only because the Brahmins need such men to fight and die for them. Valmiki’s Rama too upheld that unjust system merely because that was his Kshatriya-dharma, allotted by the Brahmins. One of the many evils that Valmiki’s Rama perpetrates heartlessly is the killing of Shambuka, a boy who belonged to a low caste but chose to become an ascetic. The...

The Little Girl

The Little Girl is a short story by Katherine Mansfield given in the class 9 English course of NCERT. Maggie gave an assignment to her students based on the story and one of her students, Athena Baby Sabu, presented a brilliant job. She converted the story into a delightful comic strip. Mansfield tells the story of Kezia who is the eponymous little girl. Kezia is scared of her father who wields a lot of control on the entire family. She is punished severely for an unwitting mistake which makes her even more scared of her father. Her grandmother is fond of her and is her emotional succour. The grandmother is away from home one day with Kezia's mother who is hospitalised. Kezia gets her usual nightmare and is terrified. There is no one at home to console her except her father from whom she does not expect any consolation. But the father rises to the occasion and lets the little girl sleep beside him that night. She rests her head on her father's chest and can feel his heart...

In this Wonderland

I didn’t write anything in the last few days. Nor did I feel any urge to write. I don’t know if this lack of interest to write is what’s called writer’s block. Or is it simple disenchantment with whatever is happening around me? We’re living in a time that offers much, too much, to writers. The whole world looks like a complex plot for a gigantic epic. The line between truth and fiction has disappeared. Mass murders have become no-news. Animals get more compassion than fellow human beings. Even their excreta are venerated! Folk tales are presented as scientific truths while scientific truths are sacrificed on the altar of political expediency. When the young generation in Nepal set fire to their Parliament and Supreme Court buildings, they were making an unmistakable statement: that they are sick of their political leaders and their systems. Is there any country whose leaders don’t sicken their citizens? I’m just wondering. Maybe, there are good leaders still left in a few coun...

The Real Enemies of India

People in general are inclined to pass the blame on to others whatever the fault.  For example, we Indians love to blame the British for their alleged ‘divide-and-rule’ policy.  Did the British really divide India into Hindus and Muslims or did the Indians do it themselves?  Was there any unified entity called India in the first place before the British unified it? Having raised those questions, I’m going to commit a further sacrilege of quoting a British journalist-cum-historian.  In his magnum opus, India: a History , John Keay says that the “stock accusations of a wider Machiavellian intent to ‘divide and rule’ and to ‘stir up Hindu-Muslim animosity’” levelled against the British Raj made little sense when the freedom struggle was going on in India because there really was no unified India until the British unified it politically.  Communal divisions existed in India despite the political unification.  In fact, they existed even before the Briti...