Skip to main content

Gandhi still matters


Mahatma Gandhi, whose death anniversary is commemorated today, is still relevant precisely because of the gulf between him and our contemporary leaders.  What sets Gandhi poles apart is the harmony or congruence that existed between his thought, word and deed.  He called that harmony ‘truth’.  He was a man of truth.  Since truth is not a fixed entity he experimented with it.  That is, he was constantly discovering truth.  His life was an ardent pursuit of truth.  He might have erred occasionally as any human being does however noble he or she may be.  But his pursuit was genuine.  He was genuine.

The absolute lack of masks is what makes Gandhi as relevant as any genuinely spiritual leader would be at any time, even centuries after his or her death.  It is those who put on different masks to suit various occasions that need to separate religion from politics, public life from private life.  “My life is my message,” Gandhi asserted boldly because he never needed any mask at any time, any place.

If Gandhi insisted on keeping India undivided, it is because he believed unconditionally in the essential unity of human beings in spite of the superficial differences such as religion or caste or language or whatever.  You can be a Hindu or a Muslim or atheist and still be a good human being living in harmony with other human beings.  For Gandhi, Independence actually meant that liberation from narrow selfish considerations such as religion-based love.

Independence is not just political liberation.  Independence is liberation of the soul (or consciousness for those who can’t accept the concept of soul) from parochialism, narrow nationalism, linguistic jingoism, or any such consideration which divides one section of the country against another.

Gandhi wept when Jawaharlal Nehru celebrated the fulfilment of India’s tryst with destiny because the nation stood pathetically divided into Hindus and Muslims who were killing one another especially in the borderlands.  Such Independence meant nothing to him. 

Those who could not grasp the magnanimous vision that the Mahatma taught were filled with hatred.  Religious hatred, the most pernicious evil in Gandhian vision.  They fired bullets into the Mahatma’s heart. 

Their spirit continued to flourish in the country and today that spirit has become more dominant than any other.  That is why Gandhi is ever more relevant today.  If only the peddlers of hatred sat down for a few weeks to study and understand what Gandhi stood for, our country would be a guiding beacon to the world.  

Related posts:


Comments

  1. Gandhi, and his philosophy is much needed in today's world. Sadly, this simple, and straight-forward soul is the most misunderstood person.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. People don't want to understand because they are interested not in truths but self-aggrandisement.

      Delete
  2. Gandhi is missed more than ever before

    ReplyDelete
  3. I grew learning Gandhi as an embodiment of truth. For the first time, at the age of 20, I was shocked to learn something as anti-Gandhi clubs. Many, including youngsters of today, believe that he was the reason behind the partition. It's disheartening to see how all his efforts and intention have gone futile. Perhaps it is the karma of this karma Bhoomi to misunderstand a great leader of truth, to get divided on the name of religion and continue the hatred for years. I sometimes feel Gandhi might not rest in peace untill India and Pakistan reunite or atleast stop being what they have been to each other since independence.

    Please enable the name, url format for comments. For WordPress Bloggers, it's much easier.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Gandhi bashing has its origin in hatred of certain sections of India's population. The godfathers of RSS were dyed in the wool haters. They contributed nothing to the freedom struggle except this hatred. Now their followers are gaining ascendancy in the country and hence strong anti-Gandhi sentiments.

      What motivated Mr Modi to declare Oct 2, Gandhi's birthday, as Swacchta diwas was nothing noble. On the contrary, he was demeaning Gandhi's greatness into mere swachhta brought about by a broom. Just as he sought to demean Christmas by declaring it as good governance day. When he replaced Gandhi with himself in the Khadi Industries calendars and diaries, he was testing the waters so that he could eventually drown Gandhi in those waters...

      I'll soon change the comments format. Thanks.

      Delete
  4. Gandhi was assassinated on 30th January 1948...but he remains in the heart of indians since generations....though there are systemic efforts to deface him from history..though Gandhi and his ideals are thrashed crushed and brualised day in and day out 24x7, 52 weeks a year....he continues to live in the hearts of the billion people of this great country and other peaceloving citizens across the globe...There are millions of Gandhians across the globe who continue to be great in their simplicity and simple living and pristine ideals....Destiny has great souls across the centuries to steer the country forward...like Emperor Ashoka, Buddha, Jain, Gandhi ...There will natural successors of their social DNA as and when the need arises..sprouting from its billion citizens.....

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. People like Gandhi don't die, really. His greatness will continue to inspire many people for ages to come.

      Louis Fischer, his biographer, compared him to Jesus and Buddha. Yes, he deserves the comparison.

      Delete
  5. Should we try ahimsa vis-a-vis Pakistan?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Gandhi said that if he were to choose between cowardice and violence, he would choose the latter. Gandhi really need be studied further?

      Delete
  6. Indu Ji, you appears to have misunderstood the concept of Ahimsa as propagated by Gandhi. Gandhi himself had asserted that if he had to choose between cowardice and violence, he would have chosen violence. Ahimsa is to be practiced in word and spirit and should be propagated with own example but it's not to be taken to the extremes. When it's impractical to go for it, one should not shy away from essential violence. That's the case with Pakistan's hostile activities towards India. All the same, we have practiced and still are practicing non-violence towards Pakistan also because we have never attacked from our side and have always maintained restraint to the extent possible. We still are interested in having good, cooperative and enmity-free relations with Pakistan. Hope, it answers your query. Ahimsa is to be practiced in general but not when you're on the battlefield facing the question of your own survival.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oh, I noticed your response to Indu after posting mine. I must express my happiness on coming across one Indian who has understood the father of the nation.

      Delete
  7. I am in complete agreement with your thoughts Sir. He is all the more relevant today. His detractors have their own axes to grind. The present Indian premier wants to associate his name with Gandhi's name just because he wants to seek advantage of the brand value attached to Gandhi's name.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It worries me that Mr Modi is usurping the Mahatma using devious methods.

      Delete
  8. Sir, I have recommended you for Bloggers Recognition Award. The relevant link is as follows :
    https://jmathur.wordpress.com/2017/02/02/bloggers-recognition-award/

    ReplyDelete
  9. Gandhi matters but in today's world who cares - when leaders like the ones in power only show the mentality of the people who chose them - there is need for some serious education now

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Who cares? So true. Gandhi is also a tool today in the hands of politicians.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Adventures of Toto as a comic strip

  'The Adventures of Toto' is an amusing story by Ruskin Bond. It is prescribed as a lesson in CBSE's English course for class 9. Maggie asked her students to do a project on some of the lessons and Femi George's work is what I would like to present here. Femi converted the story into a beautiful comic strip. Her work will speak for itself and let me present it below.  Femi George Student of Carmel Public School, Vazhakulam, Kerala Similar post: The Little Girl

The Little Girl

The Little Girl is a short story by Katherine Mansfield given in the class 9 English course of NCERT. Maggie gave an assignment to her students based on the story and one of her students, Athena Baby Sabu, presented a brilliant job. She converted the story into a delightful comic strip. Mansfield tells the story of Kezia who is the eponymous little girl. Kezia is scared of her father who wields a lot of control on the entire family. She is punished severely for an unwitting mistake which makes her even more scared of her father. Her grandmother is fond of her and is her emotional succour. The grandmother is away from home one day with Kezia's mother who is hospitalised. Kezia gets her usual nightmare and is terrified. There is no one at home to console her except her father from whom she does not expect any consolation. But the father rises to the occasion and lets the little girl sleep beside him that night. She rests her head on her father's chest and can feel his heart...

India in Modi-Trap

That’s like harnessing a telescope to a Vedic chant and expecting the stars to spin closer. Illustration by Gemini AI A friend forwarded a WhatsApp message written by K Sahadevan, Malayalam writer and social activist. The central theme is a concern for science education and research in India. The writer bemoans the fact that in India science is in a prison conjured up by Narendra Modi. The message shocked me. I hadn’t been aware of many things mentioned therein. Modi is making use of Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan’s Centre for Study and Research in Indology for his nefarious purposes projected as efforts to “preserve and promote classical Indian knowledge systems [IKS]” which include Sanskrit, Ayurveda, Jyotisha (astrology), literature, philosophy, and ancient sciences and technology. The objective is to integrate science with spirituality and cultural values. That’s like harnessing a telescope to a Vedic chant and expecting the stars to spin closer. The IKS curricula have made umpteen r...

Two Women and Their Frustrations

Illustration by Gemini AI Nora and Millie are two unforgettable women in literature. Both are frustrated with their married life, though Nora’s frustration is a late experience. How they deal with their personal situations is worth a deep study. One redeems herself while the other destroys herself as well as her husband. Nora is the protagonist of Henrik Ibsen’s play, A Doll’s House , and Millie is her counterpart in Terence Rattigan’s play, The Browning Version . [The links take you to the respective text.] Personal frustration leads one to growth into an enlightened selfhood while it embitters the other. Nora’s story is emancipatory and Millie’s is destructive. Nora questions patriarchal oppression and liberates herself from it with equanimity, while Millie is trapped in a meaningless relationship. Since I have summarised these plays in earlier posts, now I’m moving on to a discussion on the enlightening contrasts between these two characters. If you’re interested in the plot ...

The Real Enemies of India

People in general are inclined to pass the blame on to others whatever the fault.  For example, we Indians love to blame the British for their alleged ‘divide-and-rule’ policy.  Did the British really divide India into Hindus and Muslims or did the Indians do it themselves?  Was there any unified entity called India in the first place before the British unified it? Having raised those questions, I’m going to commit a further sacrilege of quoting a British journalist-cum-historian.  In his magnum opus, India: a History , John Keay says that the “stock accusations of a wider Machiavellian intent to ‘divide and rule’ and to ‘stir up Hindu-Muslim animosity’” levelled against the British Raj made little sense when the freedom struggle was going on in India because there really was no unified India until the British unified it politically.  Communal divisions existed in India despite the political unification.  In fact, they existed even before the Briti...