Skip to main content

Why religion baffles me

Sunday meditation

“Didn’t you cut open the womb of a woman and eat the foetus?” It was Kadammanitta Ramakrishnan, a celebrated Malayalam poet, who put that blunt question to a Gujarati trader who was travelling with him on a train. Kadammanitta was returning to Kerala after a visit to the post-Godhra Gujarat. The poet had seen the agonies of thousands of people living in Gujarat’s refugee camps and heard their heart-rending stories. The Gujarati trader on the train had asked the poet a question: “Are you a non-vegetarian?” “I’m not very particular about food,” Kadammanitta answered. “What about you?” The Gujarati’s brag was: “I’m a Vaishnavite. We are pure vegetarians.” It was then the poet asked him the question about eating the foetus.

Later Kadammanitta composed a couple of poems on what he had seen in Gujarat of 2002. One of them was about a group of pure-vegetarian Vaishnavites setting fire to a banyan tree under which a boy named Kamrem Alam had taken shelter. The boy became a ball of fire and soon reached the feet of God Vishnu but his ashes wouldn’t serve to fertilise the Aswatha. The poem is titled The Aswatha of Bapuji Nagar and has a reference to a line from the Gita: Aswatha sarva vrakshaanaam.

Kadammanitta wrote an ode to Bilkis Bano. What the pure vegetarians did to her made the poet hate himself, he wrote in the poem. “I accepted the curse of being born a human as I listened to what my fellow beings did to you.” 

Whenever I hear religious people talking about divine blessings, Kadammanitta (who was a devout Hindu) rushes to my mind. Why doesn’t the world become any better a place with so much religion around? That is the plain question which haunts me whenever I see thousands of people flocking to pilgrimage centres like Sabarimala (the pilgrimage season has just begun) or Bible Conventions or many other similar religious gatherings. There is so much devotion and yet there is ever-increasing evil all around. How do we justify religion at all?

What baffles me no end is that there is more evil perpetrated in the name of religion than good. I have no doubt that religion helps many people to be good and to do good. Their number is infinitesimal. That is my problem. If religion doesn’t help people to be good, what use is it? On the contrary, religion seems to make more people inhuman! That does baffle me.

In one of his letters (which became part of the Bible) Paul wrote: “If I speak in the tongues of men or of angels, but do not have love in my heart, I am only a resounding gong or a clanging cymbal.” The problem with today’s religious people is precisely that: they are little more than resounding gongs and clanging cymbals. Religion that does not touch the heart of the worshipper does more harm than good. That is what I learn from my observations.

PS. I took Kadammanitta and his poems as examples only. The problem of religious violence is ubiquitous. There is no religion that has escaped this catastrophic fate. All the more reason why we need to look at the problem seriously. 

 

 

 

 

Top post on Blogchatter

Comments

  1. Hari OM
    True. Faith structures are intended for each individual to measure and better themselves as they intereact with society - not judge that society and fall to the basest nature. Yet it seems that, en masse, the individual is lost. Herd mentality takes over and there is nothing but bestial instinct then. And the religion they profess then becomes nothing but a badge, a club... a den of animals. YAM xx

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Today those faith structures are being used as power strategies. Why people never learn essential lessons is quite a mystery.

      Delete
  2. A powerful piece. Yet so distressing leaving you with a feeling of powerlessness amidst it all...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That powerlessness is indeed the tragedy humankind, I think.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ayodhya: Kingdom of Sorrows

T he Sarayu carried more tears than water. Ayodhya was a sad kingdom. Dasaratha was a good king. He upheld dharma – justice and morality – as best as he could. The citizens were apparently happy. Then, one day, it all changed. One person is enough to change the destiny of a whole kingdom. Who was that one person? Some say it was Kaikeyi, one of the three official wives of Dasaratha. Some others say it was Manthara, Kaikeyi’s chief maid. Manthara was a hunchback. She was the caretaker of Kaikeyi right from the latter’s childhood; foster mother, so to say, because Kaikeyi had no mother. The absence of maternal influence can distort a girl child’s personality. With a foster mother like Manthara, the distortion can be really bad. Manthara was cunning, selfish, and morally ambiguous. A severe physical deformity can make one worse than all that. Manthara was as devious and manipulative as a woman could be in a men’s world. Add to that all the jealousy and ambition that insecure peo...

Bharata: The Ascetic King

Bharata is disillusioned yet again. His brother, Rama the ideal man, Maryada Purushottam , is making yet another grotesque demand. Sita Devi has to prove her purity now, years after the Agni Pariksha she arranged for herself long ago in Lanka itself. Now, when she has been living for years far away from Rama with her two sons Luva and Kusha in the paternal care of no less a saint than Valmiki himself! What has happened to Rama? Bharata sits on the bank of the Sarayu with tears welling up in his eyes. Give me an answer, Sarayu, he said. Sarayu accepted Bharata’s tears too. She was used to absorbing tears. How many times has Rama come and sat upon this very same bank and wept too? Life is sorrow, Sarayu muttered to Bharata. Even if you are royal descendants of divinity itself. Rama had brought the children Luva and Kusha to Ayodhya on the day of the Ashvamedha Yagna which he was conducting in order to reaffirm his sovereignty and legitimacy over his kingdom. He didn’t know they w...

Liberated

Fiction - parable Vijay was familiar enough with soil and the stones it turns up to realise that he had struck something rare.   It was a tiny stone, a pitch black speck not larger than the tip of his little finger. It turned up from the intestine of the earth while Vijay was digging a pit for the biogas plant. Anand, the scientist from the village, got the stone analysed in his lab and assured, “It is a rare object.   A compound of carbonic acid and magnesium.” Anand and his fellow scientists believed that it must be a fragment of a meteoroid that hit the earth millions of years ago.   “Very rare indeed,” concluded the scientist. Now, it’s plain commonsense that something that’s very rare indeed must be very valuable too. All the more so if it came from the heavens. So Vijay got the village goldsmith to set it on a gold ring.   Vijay wore the ring proudly on his ring finger. Nobody, in the village, however bothered to pay any homage to Vijay’s...

Abdullah’s Religion

O Abdulla Renowned Malayalam movie actor Mohanlal recently offered special prayers for Mammootty, another equally renowned actor of Kerala. The ritual was performed at Sabarimala temple, one of the supreme Hindu pilgrimage centres in Kerala. No one in Kerala found anything wrong in Mohanlal, a Hindu, praying for Mammootty, a Muslim, to a Hindu deity. Malayalis were concerned about Mammootty’s wellbeing and were relieved to know that the actor wasn’t suffering from anything as serious as it appeared. Except O Abdulla. Who is this Abdulla? I had never heard of him until he created an unsavoury controversy about a Hindu praying for a Muslim. This man’s Facebook profile describes him as: “Former Professor Islahiaya, Media Critic, Ex-Interpreter of Indian Ambassador, Founder Member MADHYAMAM.” He has 108K followers on FB. As I was reading Malayalam weekly this morning, I came to know that this Abdulla is a former member of Jamaat-e-Islami Hind Kerala , a fundamentalist organisation. ...

Empuraan – Review

Revenge is an ancient theme in human narratives. Give a moral rationale for the revenge and make the antagonist look monstrously evil, then you have the material for a good work of art. Add to that some spices from contemporary politics and the recipe is quite right for a hit movie. This is what you get in the Malayalam movie, Empuraan , which is running full houses now despite the trenchant opposition to it from the emergent Hindutva forces in the state. First of all, I fail to understand why so much brouhaha was hollered by the Hindutvans [let me coin that word for sheer convenience] who managed to get some 3 minutes censored from the 3-hour movie. The movie doesn’t make any explicit mention of any of the existing Hindutva political parties or other organisations. On the other hand, Allahu Akbar is shouted menacingly by Islamic terrorists, albeit towards the end. True, the movie begins with an implicit reference to what happened in Gujarat in 2002 after the Godhra train burnin...