Skip to main content

Vultures and Religion


When vultures become extinct, why should a religion face a threat?

“When the vultures died off, they stopped eating the bodies of Zoroastrians…” I was amused as I went on reading the book The Final Farewell by Minakshi Dewan. The book is about how the dead are dealt with by people of different religious persuasions. Dead people are quite useless, unless you love euphemism. Or, as they say, dead people tell no tales. In the end, we are all just stories made by people like the religious woman who wrote the epitaph for her atheist husband: “Here lies an atheist, all dressed up and no place to go.”

Zoroastrianism is a religion which converts death into a sordid tale by throwing the corpses of its believers to vultures. Death makes one impure, according to that religion. Well, I always thought, and still do, that life makes one impure. I have the support of Lord Buddha on that. Life is dukkha, said the Enlightened. That is, suffering, dissatisfaction and unease. Death is liberation from dukkha. But prophet Zoroaster would debate that. I do hope that Buddha and Zoroaster are having healthy debates in whichever galaxy they may be existing now. Thinking in that vein, I wonder whether prophet Muhamad and Lord Rama are fighting up there on the issue of the demolition of the Babri Masjid in Ayodhya and the subsequent construction of the splendid Ram Mandir by the present Emperor of India.

That brings me back to Minakshi Dewan’s book. The Zoroastrians were driven away from Iran by the Arabs who conquered the land and converted its people from Zoroaster’s ways to Muhamad’s. I wonder, again, how these prophets greeted each other in that celestial galaxy when this conquest occurred. By the way, Iran was known as Eranshahr in those days, which literally means “Domain of the Aryans.” Now, what do the present Aryan rulers of India have to say about all that, I wonder again. In short, this book about death is very amusing. Thought-provoking, more aptly.

Some of those Zoroastrians who didn’t want to shift their loyalty from one prophet to another ran away and reached India. They came to be known as Parsis (Persians).  These people, Parsis, thought of the dead body as a source of impurity. That is why they threw it to the vultures.

And the vultures have now become extinct creating a huge problem for the Parsis in India. This is probably the only instance of a religion facing the threat of extinction because of the extinction of vultures.

According to a 2016 survey conducted by the Bombay Natural History Society, says Minakshi Dewan, India’s vulture population has decreased by 99% over the last 15 years because of the use of a chemical called diclofenac by the humans. Diclofenac is an anti-inflammatory drug used by humans who also feed it to their livestock as and when required. Vultures that fed on the carcasses of creatures that used diclofenac died off. Vultures are more sensitive, apparently, than humans.

So the bodies of dead Parsis started rotting in their funerary Towers of Silence. Consequently, some practical-minded Parsis have opted for more civilised ways of disposing of their dead members, like using electric crematoriums. The extinction of vultures may have some merits too, it seems. I don’t know if any Parsi is praying to Zoroaster to send some diclofenac-resistant vultures from the galaxy where the prophet is sipping tea in the company of his counterpart Muhamad [PBUH].

I find Minakshi Dewan’s book quite amusing because it tickles my funny bone. By the way, I didn’t buy a copy of this book. It came free like many other books do occasionally in my life now.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ayodhya: Kingdom of Sorrows

T he Sarayu carried more tears than water. Ayodhya was a sad kingdom. Dasaratha was a good king. He upheld dharma – justice and morality – as best as he could. The citizens were apparently happy. Then, one day, it all changed. One person is enough to change the destiny of a whole kingdom. Who was that one person? Some say it was Kaikeyi, one of the three official wives of Dasaratha. Some others say it was Manthara, Kaikeyi’s chief maid. Manthara was a hunchback. She was the caretaker of Kaikeyi right from the latter’s childhood; foster mother, so to say, because Kaikeyi had no mother. The absence of maternal influence can distort a girl child’s personality. With a foster mother like Manthara, the distortion can be really bad. Manthara was cunning, selfish, and morally ambiguous. A severe physical deformity can make one worse than all that. Manthara was as devious and manipulative as a woman could be in a men’s world. Add to that all the jealousy and ambition that insecure peo...

Abdullah’s Religion

O Abdulla Renowned Malayalam movie actor Mohanlal recently offered special prayers for Mammootty, another equally renowned actor of Kerala. The ritual was performed at Sabarimala temple, one of the supreme Hindu pilgrimage centres in Kerala. No one in Kerala found anything wrong in Mohanlal, a Hindu, praying for Mammootty, a Muslim, to a Hindu deity. Malayalis were concerned about Mammootty’s wellbeing and were relieved to know that the actor wasn’t suffering from anything as serious as it appeared. Except O Abdulla. Who is this Abdulla? I had never heard of him until he created an unsavoury controversy about a Hindu praying for a Muslim. This man’s Facebook profile describes him as: “Former Professor Islahiaya, Media Critic, Ex-Interpreter of Indian Ambassador, Founder Member MADHYAMAM.” He has 108K followers on FB. As I was reading Malayalam weekly this morning, I came to know that this Abdulla is a former member of Jamaat-e-Islami Hind Kerala , a fundamentalist organisation. ...

Lucifer and some reflections

Let me start with a disclaimer: this is not a review of the Malayalam movie, Lucifer . These are some thoughts that came to my mind as I watched the movie today. However, just to give an idea about the movie: it’s a good entertainer with an engaging plot, Bollywood style settings, superman type violence in which the hero decimates the villains with pomp and show, and a spicy dance that is neatly tucked into the terribly orgasmic climax of the plot. The theme is highly relevant and that is what engaged me more. The role of certain mafia gangs in political governance is a theme that deserves to be examined in a good movie. In the movie, the mafia-politician nexus is busted and, like in our great myths, virtue triumphs over vice. Such a triumph is an artistic requirement. Real life, however, follows the principle of entropy: chaos flourishes with vengeance. Lucifer is the real winner in real life. The title of the movie as well as a final dialogue from the eponymous hero sugg...

Empuraan and Ramayana

Maggie and I will be watching the Malayalam movie Empuraan tomorrow. The tickets are booked. The movie has created a lot of controversy in Kerala and the director has decided to impose no less than 17 censors on it himself. I want to watch it before the jingoistic scissors find its way to the movie. It is surprising that the people of Kerala took such exception to this movie when the same people had no problem with the utterly malicious and mendacious movie The Kerala Story (2023). [My post on that movie, which I didn’t watch, is here .] Empuraan is based partly on the Gujarat riots of 2002. The riots were real and the BJP’s role in it (Mr Modi’s, in fact) is well-known. So, Empuraan isn’t giving the audience any falsehood as The Kerala Story did. Moreover, The Kerala Story maligned the people of Kerala while Empuraan is about something that happened in the faraway Gujarat quite long ago. Why are the people of Kerala then upset with Empuraan ? Because it tells the truth, M...

Empuraan – Review

Revenge is an ancient theme in human narratives. Give a moral rationale for the revenge and make the antagonist look monstrously evil, then you have the material for a good work of art. Add to that some spices from contemporary politics and the recipe is quite right for a hit movie. This is what you get in the Malayalam movie, Empuraan , which is running full houses now despite the trenchant opposition to it from the emergent Hindutva forces in the state. First of all, I fail to understand why so much brouhaha was hollered by the Hindutvans [let me coin that word for sheer convenience] who managed to get some 3 minutes censored from the 3-hour movie. The movie doesn’t make any explicit mention of any of the existing Hindutva political parties or other organisations. On the other hand, Allahu Akbar is shouted menacingly by Islamic terrorists, albeit towards the end. True, the movie begins with an implicit reference to what happened in Gujarat in 2002 after the Godhra train burnin...