Skip to main content

Ayodhya: Kingdom of Sorrows


The Sarayu carried more tears than water. Ayodhya was a sad kingdom.

Dasaratha was a good king. He upheld dharma – justice and morality – as best as he could. The citizens were apparently happy.

Then, one day, it all changed. One person is enough to change the destiny of a whole kingdom. Who was that one person? Some say it was Kaikeyi, one of the three official wives of Dasaratha. Some others say it was Manthara, Kaikeyi’s chief maid.

Manthara was a hunchback. She was the caretaker of Kaikeyi right from the latter’s childhood; foster mother, so to say, because Kaikeyi had no mother. The absence of maternal influence can distort a girl child’s personality. With a foster mother like Manthara, the distortion can be really bad.

Manthara was cunning, selfish, and morally ambiguous. A severe physical deformity can make one worse than all that. Manthara was as devious and manipulative as a woman could be in a men’s world. Add to that all the jealousy and ambition that insecure people tend to possess.

It is said that Manthara poisoned Kaikeyi’s consciousness. But Kaikeyi was a grown-up adult, a queen, when she demanded the exile of Rama, the crown prince of Ayodhya. Why didn’t she exercise her own personal morality and convictions?

The Sarayu was destined to weep. They called it Karma. You bear the fruits of your actions. If you are a river, you will carry the karma of the people on your banks and beyond. Have you ever wondered why the Ganga is always polluted?

Ayodhya wanted Rama as their next king. Rama was a gentleman, gentle man. He was quite the opposite of Manthara. Selfless and compassionate, he was hailed as Maryada Purushottam, the ideal man. But destiny sent him to the wilderness for fourteen years; destiny in the form of Kaikeyi’s demand which in turn came from Manthara the maid with twisted bones and more twisted mind.

The destiny of an entire kingdom can be altered by anyone at all, even a hunchback maid. It could be a washerman too (as it happened later to Sita), or a teaseller. Just anyone.

And the Sarayu wept each time. She had no choice but carry people’s karma. Even in a kingdom of dharma where a son’s obedience, father’s grief, brother’s loyalty, and a wife’s ordeal merge into the troubled waters of a river.

Ayodhya had more good citizens than evil ones. Yet it was a sad kingdom. Because where dharma wins, love is likely to lose.

Rama went into exile to uphold dharma. Sita jumped into fire to prove the authenticity of her personal dharma. Lakshmana sacrificed his youth for the sake of dharma. Bharata relinquished royal powers, again for the sake of dharma.

In spite of all that, Ayodhya remained a sad kingdom. Rama sat on the bank of the Sarayu in the end, a solitary man who upheld dharma and lost his beloved wife.

PS. I’m participating in #BlogchatterA2Z. This series will look at the Ramayana from various angles. 


Tomorrow: Bharat: The Ascetic King

 

 

 

 

Comments

  1. The upholding of 'Dharma' certainly demands several personal sacrifices.

    Cut to the present where dharma and sacrifice are demanded from others for a select few to stay in power.

    I am usually a little hesitant when someone picks a topic that has religious undertones, but this one resonated.

    Cheers,
    CRD

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Do return for the whole series. I assure you it will be worthwhile.

      Delete
  2. Hari Om
    As Ram Navami approaches, these ruminations will make for an interesting read... YAM xx

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The series will get more philosophical as it moves on.

      Delete
  3. Dharma requires personal sacrifices. A path of righteousness is not easy.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Absolutely. This theme of dharma and sacrifice will come up again and again in this series. One post, dedicated entirely to Dharma, will examine whether some of that pain can be mitigated.

      Delete
  4. This was a wonderful read. It's so true that everyone blames Kaikeyi but no one understands that it was Manthara who planted the seed in her mind. I am looking forward to your posts.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Glad to have you on this journey which is a personal quest for me.

      Delete
  5. Do you wonder why the Ganga is always polluted - wow. What a wonderful look at Ramayana and dharma. Cannot wait to read more in this series.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'll be delighted to have you till the end. It may jolt you occasionally.

      Delete
  6. Mothers naturally consider their daughter's well-being, as Manthara did. Similarly mothers think of their son's welfare, as Kaikeyi did. Today, we often see full-sisters, close in their youth, drifting apart as they focus on their own families and children. Ramayana is about son of other wife of her husband!! Given the natural tendencies, is it fair to blame Manthara or Kaikeyi. Everyone played their role. :-) Good start sir.

    //Because where dharma wins, love is likely to lose. // Take home for today :-)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm actually a learner of the Ramayana. So these discussions are good for me and I'm glad many are joining.

      Delete
  7. In all the stories women are described as eternal beauties , the strong backbone of the family , but indeed the same woman can make things go wrong and destroy the peace and happiness of the family . Just like that in everyones childhood mothers are their supreme care support and love but some times even those scenarios can go wrong , and this Ayodhya series depict one such scenario. Indeed a woman or any one person is enough for the destruction of any good things just as we see in here . The selfishness , crooked mind of a woman , and how one bad personality can influence and manipulate another person is perfectly demonstrated in this first series. This series can be very helpful for people like me (the young generation)who are curious to know about all these series , very excited to read the upcoming series .

    Love reading this!! ❤️

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm glad to have you here, Mary Ann, the youngest commenter so far. I'm glad you've taken to this with some zest. Let's get to know our epic better. Welcome to this space.

      Delete
  8. Everything was destined to happen. But I sometimes wonder, why it happened the way it happened. Your post is beautiful and poetic. Loved the opening line: "Sarayu carried more tears than water." Deep indeed!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm looking at the epic as a literary work rather than religious. Some of the coming posts may be a little unorthodox.

      Delete
  9. What a marvelously woven yarn out of the ancient piece! Sarayu's soulful mourning wets the heart and dampens the spirit. A unique write up, not to sound panglossian! Good going.... April 1 has brought wisdom in a new hue! Melted in it..no words...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you for this poetic appreciation. I'm actually buried in the Ramayana these days.

      Delete
    2. That sounds interesting... waiting in anticipation for the following ones.

      Delete
  10. How brilliantly you have showcased the epic in your own unique style ! And the line : where dharma wins, love is likely to lose; is just too impactful. Eagerly waiting for the next read, Sir !

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Do accompany me on this journey, Chinmayee. I have put in much meditation for this series.

      Delete
  11. I liked how you keep asserting the Ayodhya was a sad kingdom and site examples too, but dharma's path is tough, and i believe during the age of Ram dharma above else was important. Like they say in hindi " pran jaye par vachan na jaye"
    Hoping to follow you in this journey

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Do join and add this sort of comments which help me understand the epic better. Yes, I understand how dharma must have meant the cosmos to Rama. But I do dare to question that in the post on Dharma and Destiny. That's how I learn.

      Delete
  12. Good start Sir! I always thought Ayodhya is fortunate to have Rama born there. But ya as you said, it became a sad kingdom bearing the burden of multiple mishaps. Will bookmark and follow this series through A2Z. It's always interesting to learn deep about Indian Epics.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm thrilled that I have so much support on this. Thank you for being with me.

      Delete
  13. I did A-Z challenge when I first start blogging.

    ReplyDelete
  14. This is quite a thought-provoking reflection on Ramayana ... the cascading effects of ones actions and role of dharma, karma, etc.

    ReplyDelete
  15. An amazing start to the Ramayana written with a different view point! I look forward to reading more.

    ReplyDelete
  16. You got me invested in your writing right from the first line. What powerful imagery—I have never looked at the river that way. Also, the take on a river carrying the karma of the people on its bank is intriguing too.
    Loved the whole narrative, but if I have to stick to just one line, it would be this: Because where dharma wins, love is likely to lose. This is sure to stay etched in my mind for a long long time.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for the good words, dear friend.

      Dharma is coming for discussion under letter D. I must add that I am a learner myself here and not a scholar of Ramayana. Secondly, I read it as a work of literature rather than a religious text.

      Delete
  17. Ganga is polluted as we don't understand that it needs space to flow! Ayodhya is a sad kingdom even now. All of mythology is a drama that was probably designed to foster goodwill but I guess its how we interpret it that makes it real or reel!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, Ambica. How we interpret our epics, scriptures, and anything of that sort matters a lot. That's precisely why I embarked on this venture.

      Delete
  18. Finally, starting to read your posts. This sentence "It could be a washerman too (as it happened later to Sita), or a teaseller. " is your trademark tongue-in-cheek remark.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Adventures of Toto as a comic strip

  'The Adventures of Toto' is an amusing story by Ruskin Bond. It is prescribed as a lesson in CBSE's English course for class 9. Maggie asked her students to do a project on some of the lessons and Femi George's work is what I would like to present here. Femi converted the story into a beautiful comic strip. Her work will speak for itself and let me present it below.  Femi George Student of Carmel Public School, Vazhakulam, Kerala Similar post: The Little Girl

The Ugly Duckling

Source: Acting Company A. A. Milne’s one-act play, The Ugly Duckling , acquired a classical status because of the hearty humour used to present a profound theme. The King and the Queen are worried because their daughter Camilla is too ugly to get a suitor. In spite of all the devious strategies employed by the King and his Chancellor, the princess remained unmarried. Camilla was blessed with a unique beauty by her two godmothers but no one could see any beauty in her physical appearance. She has an exquisitely beautiful character. What use is character? The King asks. The play is an answer to that question. Character plays the most crucial role in our moral science books and traditional rhetoric, religious scriptures and homilies. When it comes to practical life, we look for other things such as wealth, social rank, physical looks, and so on. As the King says in this play, “If a girl is beautiful, it is easy to assume that she has, tucked away inside her, an equally beauti...

Helpless Gods

Illustration by Gemini Six decades ago, Kerala’s beloved poet Vayalar Ramavarma sang about gods that don’t open their eyes, don’t know joy or sorrow, but are mere clay idols. The movie that carried the song was a hit in Kerala in the late 1960s. I was only seven when the movie was released. The impact of the song, like many others composed by the same poet, sank into me a little later as I grew up. Our gods are quite useless; they are little more than narcissists who demand fresh and fragrant flowers only to fling them when they wither. Six decades after Kerala’s poet questioned the potency of gods, the Chief Justice of India had a shoe flung at him by a lawyer for the same thing: questioning the worth of gods. The lawyer was demanding the replacement of a damaged idol of god Vishnu and the Chief Justice wondered why gods couldn’t take care of themselves since they are omnipotent. The lawyer flung his shoe at the Chief Justice to prove his devotion to a god. From Vayalar of 196...

The Real Enemies of India

People in general are inclined to pass the blame on to others whatever the fault.  For example, we Indians love to blame the British for their alleged ‘divide-and-rule’ policy.  Did the British really divide India into Hindus and Muslims or did the Indians do it themselves?  Was there any unified entity called India in the first place before the British unified it? Having raised those questions, I’m going to commit a further sacrilege of quoting a British journalist-cum-historian.  In his magnum opus, India: a History , John Keay says that the “stock accusations of a wider Machiavellian intent to ‘divide and rule’ and to ‘stir up Hindu-Muslim animosity’” levelled against the British Raj made little sense when the freedom struggle was going on in India because there really was no unified India until the British unified it politically.  Communal divisions existed in India despite the political unification.  In fact, they existed even before the Briti...

Our gods must have died laughing

A friend forwarded a video clip this morning. It is an extract from a speech that celebrated Malayalam movie actor Sreenivasan delivered years ago. In the year 1984, Sreenivasan decided to marry the woman he was in love with. But his career in movies had just started and so he hadn’t made much money. Knowing his financial condition, another actor, Innocent, gave him Rs 400. Innocent wasn’t doing well either in the profession. “Alice’s bangle,” Innocent said. He had pawned or sold his wife’s bangle to get that amount for his friend. Then Sreenivasan went to Mammootty, who eventually became Malayalam’s superstar, to request for help. Mammootty gave him Rs 2000. Citing the goodness of the two men, Sreenivasan said that the wedding necklace ( mangalsutra ) he put ceremoniously around the neck of his Hindu wife was funded by a Christian (Innocent) and a Muslim (Mammootty). “What does religion matter?” Sreenivasan asks in the video. “You either refuse to believe in any or believe in a...