Skip to main content

Ikshvaku: Mythos versus Logos

By Copilot Designer


How much of the Ramayana is historical, how much myth? This is a question that has befriended me for years. The years haven’t given me a definitive answer. When students ask me this question, my answer is: ‘There must have been a king like Rama in Ayodhya some time, possibly…’

The Ikshvaku dynasty or Suryavansha is more mythological than historical. There is no conclusive documented history on the dynasty. The name Ikshvaku does appear in some ancient literature. For example, the Shakyas – Gautama Buddha’s clan – trace their lineage to the same royal house, in ancient Buddhist literature.

There was a historical Ikshvaku dynasty that ruled parts of South India (present-day Andhra regions) in the third century CE, but that is centuries after the period traditionally associated with Rama.

My study so far on this informs me that the Ikshvaku dynasty functions less as a historical fact and more as a spiritual and cultural blueprint, reminding generations of the ideals a leader – and indeed any human being - should strive for.  

Myths help humans discover order and meaning in life. From time immemorial, humans have been fascinated with the mystery that surrounds them. A sense of the numinous seems to be coeval with the origin of the human species. That sense preceded even the desire to explain the world rationally or find a basis for ethical behaviour.

Myths are not meant for providing rational explanations for what lies beyond human understanding, but an attempt to express the human wonder at the experience of those mysteries and also to link the pervasive mystery with their own lives. Some of those experiences are benign, some malign, and a few may not leave any deep impressions. The benign forces become divine in the myths, the malign ones become evil spirits or rakshasas or whatever. People adopt a particular conception of the supernatural because it works for them, not because it is rationally sound or scientifically provable.

Mythos is symbolic truth, in other words. It provides spiritual consolation. Logos, on the other hand, is rational or empirical knowledge. Science privileges logos over mythos. In spite of the tremendous progress of science and technology, mythos has stayed with humans stronger than ever because myths provide the narrative framework for cultures to forge identity, moral framework, a sense of communal belonging, and so on.

As famous mythologist Joseph Campbell put it, “Myth is the secret opening through which the inexhaustible energies of the cosmos pour into human cultural manifestation.”

Rama of the Ramayana is a symbolic channel through which the ideals of dharma, sacrifice, love, and duty find a concrete form. His story is the story of a quest for righteousness in a chaotic world. His dynasty, the Ikshvaku, may belong to the realms of the numinous; but his struggles and anguishes are ours.

PS. I’m participating in #BlogchatterA2Z. This series looks at the Ramayana from various angles.

Tomorrow: Jatayu: The Winged Warrior

Previous Posts in this series:

Ayodhya: Kingdom of Sorrows

Bharata: The Ascetic King

Chitrakoot: The Antithesis of Ayodhya

Dharma and Destiny

Exile and the Kingdom

Friendship in Kishkindha

Golden Deer: Illusions

Hanuman: Zenith of Devotion

 

Comments

  1. Some scholars have made careers out of trying to link various myths to historical record. It's interesting how the stories take on lives of their own.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oh, yes, too many of them, especially in our times. I can never forget our own B B Lal, prominent archaeologist who altered his own genuine findings for the sake of politicians.

      Delete
  2. The effort to reason with the existence of myth is something that barely formed in me at some point of time and continue to hover in my thoughts in my leisure hours. Happy to find it articulated very clearly in this blog. I resonate with all the hypotheses formed and the inferences made!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Writing this post was a little difficult. I once hinted about it to you on WA. I'm happy to say that I'm learning to manage my balance on that metaphorical plank in your response to my concern.

      Delete
  3. Hari OM
    Re your response to Dawndandew, I can see that balancing taking place in you. In many ways, the Mahabharata, Ramayana, Srimad Bhagavatam and such are more in the tradition of fable - stories told for the purpose of learning. Like smoke from a fire, there is some firm basis from which they rise, but they twist and turn and affect everyone differently by how much reaches them.

    I am reminded of Guruji Swami Chinmayananda's great response to a devotee who complained to him that, having been throught the Gita many times over, he felt no improvement. "Many times? Commendable practice. Tell me, how many times have you allowed the Gita to go through you?"

    YAM xx

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I understand, Yam. In fact, any good book can change us provided we let it do the job. People like me remain rigidly rational: the truth is I can't help it. Now I'm making an extra effort to rationally understand the necessary irrationality of certain wisdom.

      Delete
  4. 'Myths help humans discover order and meaning in life !' How profound ! This post has so much depth in it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Humans will find life quite unbearable without myths!

      Delete
  5. Your last line says it all! Another brilliant post that is food for thought, Sir. Mayuri

    ReplyDelete
  6. My kid and I used to discuss & debate on this. At this time, we may have to infer, which all of us are doing in our own way. Another meaningful post. Well done sir.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. May the new gen learn to appreciate both mythos and logos.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Adventures of Toto as a comic strip

  'The Adventures of Toto' is an amusing story by Ruskin Bond. It is prescribed as a lesson in CBSE's English course for class 9. Maggie asked her students to do a project on some of the lessons and Femi George's work is what I would like to present here. Femi converted the story into a beautiful comic strip. Her work will speak for itself and let me present it below.  Femi George Student of Carmel Public School, Vazhakulam, Kerala Similar post: The Little Girl

The Ugly Duckling

Source: Acting Company A. A. Milne’s one-act play, The Ugly Duckling , acquired a classical status because of the hearty humour used to present a profound theme. The King and the Queen are worried because their daughter Camilla is too ugly to get a suitor. In spite of all the devious strategies employed by the King and his Chancellor, the princess remained unmarried. Camilla was blessed with a unique beauty by her two godmothers but no one could see any beauty in her physical appearance. She has an exquisitely beautiful character. What use is character? The King asks. The play is an answer to that question. Character plays the most crucial role in our moral science books and traditional rhetoric, religious scriptures and homilies. When it comes to practical life, we look for other things such as wealth, social rank, physical looks, and so on. As the King says in this play, “If a girl is beautiful, it is easy to assume that she has, tucked away inside her, an equally beauti...

Helpless Gods

Illustration by Gemini Six decades ago, Kerala’s beloved poet Vayalar Ramavarma sang about gods that don’t open their eyes, don’t know joy or sorrow, but are mere clay idols. The movie that carried the song was a hit in Kerala in the late 1960s. I was only seven when the movie was released. The impact of the song, like many others composed by the same poet, sank into me a little later as I grew up. Our gods are quite useless; they are little more than narcissists who demand fresh and fragrant flowers only to fling them when they wither. Six decades after Kerala’s poet questioned the potency of gods, the Chief Justice of India had a shoe flung at him by a lawyer for the same thing: questioning the worth of gods. The lawyer was demanding the replacement of a damaged idol of god Vishnu and the Chief Justice wondered why gods couldn’t take care of themselves since they are omnipotent. The lawyer flung his shoe at the Chief Justice to prove his devotion to a god. From Vayalar of 196...

The Real Enemies of India

People in general are inclined to pass the blame on to others whatever the fault.  For example, we Indians love to blame the British for their alleged ‘divide-and-rule’ policy.  Did the British really divide India into Hindus and Muslims or did the Indians do it themselves?  Was there any unified entity called India in the first place before the British unified it? Having raised those questions, I’m going to commit a further sacrilege of quoting a British journalist-cum-historian.  In his magnum opus, India: a History , John Keay says that the “stock accusations of a wider Machiavellian intent to ‘divide and rule’ and to ‘stir up Hindu-Muslim animosity’” levelled against the British Raj made little sense when the freedom struggle was going on in India because there really was no unified India until the British unified it politically.  Communal divisions existed in India despite the political unification.  In fact, they existed even before the Briti...

Our gods must have died laughing

A friend forwarded a video clip this morning. It is an extract from a speech that celebrated Malayalam movie actor Sreenivasan delivered years ago. In the year 1984, Sreenivasan decided to marry the woman he was in love with. But his career in movies had just started and so he hadn’t made much money. Knowing his financial condition, another actor, Innocent, gave him Rs 400. Innocent wasn’t doing well either in the profession. “Alice’s bangle,” Innocent said. He had pawned or sold his wife’s bangle to get that amount for his friend. Then Sreenivasan went to Mammootty, who eventually became Malayalam’s superstar, to request for help. Mammootty gave him Rs 2000. Citing the goodness of the two men, Sreenivasan said that the wedding necklace ( mangalsutra ) he put ceremoniously around the neck of his Hindu wife was funded by a Christian (Innocent) and a Muslim (Mammootty). “What does religion matter?” Sreenivasan asks in the video. “You either refuse to believe in any or believe in a...