Skip to main content

The Silence of the Sarayu

By Gemini AI


The Sarayu wept again. In silence. Sita had been swallowed by the earth.

If I have been pure in thought, word, and deed,
and have never once thought of any man but Rama,
then, O Mother Earth, receive me into your bosom.

Sita prayed and Bhumi Devi, Mother Earth, appeared personally to take Sita into her embrace. She vanished from the earth after that.

Silence descended on Ayodhya. It engulfed Rama and Lakshmana and everyone else. The Sarayu was both a witness and a participant of all the sighs that underlay the silence.

Rama fell into silence after Sita’s departure. He knew he was incomplete without Sita. He knew that words would have no meaning hereafter. The silence of the fissured heart is more eloquent than the music of apsaras. The Sarayu could feel the pulse of Rama’s silence as he sat on her shore looking into her depths for days on end.

Words have had their time already. The Sarayu recalled how words fell from Sita’s noble lips when Rama asked her to undergo the fire test again. “I am not the woman you take me for,” she asserted herself on Rama’s face. “My purity is untouched. You speak like a common man, not a noble king. If there is any impurity in me, let fire consume me. If I am pure, Agni will protect me.”

They turned out to be mere words. Like a mathematician’s elegant equation recited to a crowd unburdened by numbers. Like a sweet melody played to a deaf audience. The mathematician and the melodist all bow out. Silence descends. A silence that transcends mere absence of sound. A silence that is more potent than any eloquent speech.

The Sarayu flowed silently, mirroring the amber of the sky in the day and its darkness at night. The silence grew heavy and heavier. It was a pregnant silence. And then, one day, it delivered.

No fanfare, no chariots, no vanquished foes this time – only the gentle hush of water receiving its own king. Rama walked into the river, no more a warrior, but a weary soul returning home.

It was the time of the ultimate renunciation on the part of Rama. Renunciation of karma itself. All the roles had been played out: son, king, husband, warrior. Now it is time to merge into the silence of eternity. The Sarayu absorbs the final merging of the human into the divine. How much of it all was real, and how much maya? Sarayu reflected. Humans, demons, and the divine. A lot of noise that peters out to this final utter silence.

Sarayu has been there from the beginning: Rama’s exile and then the triumphant return. She has seen them all: the agonies and the ecstasies. Now she knows that all of it comes to this finality: the ultimate silence.

Perhaps that is how all stories end: not in thunder or applause, but in silence. In the gentle hush of a river that carries away kings and commoners, and keeps the story flowing.

PS. I’m participating in #BlogchatterA2Z. This series looks at the Ramayana from various angles.

Tomorrow: Tara of Kishkindha

Previous Posts in this series:

A

B

C

D

E

F

G

H

I

J

K

L

M

N

O

P

Q

R

 

 

 

 

Comments

  1. This is beautiful! The whole post has a sense of melancholy but also soothes the reader with assurance that life will continue, just like the river.

    ReplyDelete
  2. What may begin with a bang will have to end with a whimper.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hari Om
    I agree with Srivalli. Here, your words take on a river-like current drawing us through the silence which we all must, finally, face. YAM xx

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Someone told me this is repetitive, my love for the Sarayu. I'm in love with water, rivers particularly. Rivers can make me a poet sometimes.

      Delete
  4. All stories end in silence
    How profound

    Didn't read ur other posts but could visualise this ...stumbled upon blog remembering my old a to z days :) so good to see u writing so bfully!
    My best

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I hope you'll return. :) The series is ending soon and the final episodes are going to be slightly louder.

      Delete
  5. The sarayu sees it all, feels it all. Never speaks, but in silence, she answers

    ReplyDelete
  6. Your portrayal of Rama’s silence after Sita’s departure is hauntingly beautiful. The way you describe his realization of incompleteness, sitting by the Sarayu, speaks volumes about the depth of his grief. It’s a silence that transcends words, a silence that the river itself seems to echo.

    The imagery of Sita’s final moments, her prayer to Mother Earth, and her subsequent disappearance into the earth is poignant. It’s a powerful reminder of the transient nature of life and the impermanence of even the most steadfast beings. The Sarayu, witnessing and absorbing all these emotions, becomes a silent participant in the unfolding tragedy.

    Your reflection on how stories often end not with grandeur but in quietude resonates deeply. It’s a reminder that sometimes, the most profound moments are those that are unspoken. Thank you for sharing this contemplative piece—it’s left me with much to ponder.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you for your detailed comments on my Ramayana posts. Each of your comments summarises as well as explains the post succinctly.

      Delete
  7. This was a sad post. Also a very wise one - telling us that all actions have consequences. I was unaware that this is how Lord Ram ended his life . Mayuri

    ReplyDelete
  8. How does one interpret silence? And was Sita taken for granted by Rama? I often wonder. A thought provoking post, Sir !

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Adventures of Toto as a comic strip

  'The Adventures of Toto' is an amusing story by Ruskin Bond. It is prescribed as a lesson in CBSE's English course for class 9. Maggie asked her students to do a project on some of the lessons and Femi George's work is what I would like to present here. Femi converted the story into a beautiful comic strip. Her work will speak for itself and let me present it below.  Femi George Student of Carmel Public School, Vazhakulam, Kerala Similar post: The Little Girl

The Ugly Duckling

Source: Acting Company A. A. Milne’s one-act play, The Ugly Duckling , acquired a classical status because of the hearty humour used to present a profound theme. The King and the Queen are worried because their daughter Camilla is too ugly to get a suitor. In spite of all the devious strategies employed by the King and his Chancellor, the princess remained unmarried. Camilla was blessed with a unique beauty by her two godmothers but no one could see any beauty in her physical appearance. She has an exquisitely beautiful character. What use is character? The King asks. The play is an answer to that question. Character plays the most crucial role in our moral science books and traditional rhetoric, religious scriptures and homilies. When it comes to practical life, we look for other things such as wealth, social rank, physical looks, and so on. As the King says in this play, “If a girl is beautiful, it is easy to assume that she has, tucked away inside her, an equally beauti...

Helpless Gods

Illustration by Gemini Six decades ago, Kerala’s beloved poet Vayalar Ramavarma sang about gods that don’t open their eyes, don’t know joy or sorrow, but are mere clay idols. The movie that carried the song was a hit in Kerala in the late 1960s. I was only seven when the movie was released. The impact of the song, like many others composed by the same poet, sank into me a little later as I grew up. Our gods are quite useless; they are little more than narcissists who demand fresh and fragrant flowers only to fling them when they wither. Six decades after Kerala’s poet questioned the potency of gods, the Chief Justice of India had a shoe flung at him by a lawyer for the same thing: questioning the worth of gods. The lawyer was demanding the replacement of a damaged idol of god Vishnu and the Chief Justice wondered why gods couldn’t take care of themselves since they are omnipotent. The lawyer flung his shoe at the Chief Justice to prove his devotion to a god. From Vayalar of 196...

The Real Enemies of India

People in general are inclined to pass the blame on to others whatever the fault.  For example, we Indians love to blame the British for their alleged ‘divide-and-rule’ policy.  Did the British really divide India into Hindus and Muslims or did the Indians do it themselves?  Was there any unified entity called India in the first place before the British unified it? Having raised those questions, I’m going to commit a further sacrilege of quoting a British journalist-cum-historian.  In his magnum opus, India: a History , John Keay says that the “stock accusations of a wider Machiavellian intent to ‘divide and rule’ and to ‘stir up Hindu-Muslim animosity’” levelled against the British Raj made little sense when the freedom struggle was going on in India because there really was no unified India until the British unified it politically.  Communal divisions existed in India despite the political unification.  In fact, they existed even before the Briti...

Our gods must have died laughing

A friend forwarded a video clip this morning. It is an extract from a speech that celebrated Malayalam movie actor Sreenivasan delivered years ago. In the year 1984, Sreenivasan decided to marry the woman he was in love with. But his career in movies had just started and so he hadn’t made much money. Knowing his financial condition, another actor, Innocent, gave him Rs 400. Innocent wasn’t doing well either in the profession. “Alice’s bangle,” Innocent said. He had pawned or sold his wife’s bangle to get that amount for his friend. Then Sreenivasan went to Mammootty, who eventually became Malayalam’s superstar, to request for help. Mammootty gave him Rs 2000. Citing the goodness of the two men, Sreenivasan said that the wedding necklace ( mangalsutra ) he put ceremoniously around the neck of his Hindu wife was funded by a Christian (Innocent) and a Muslim (Mammootty). “What does religion matter?” Sreenivasan asks in the video. “You either refuse to believe in any or believe in a...