Skip to main content

Satanic Verses



“You’re lucky to have invented a god who dances to your tunes.”   The youngest and the most beloved wife of the Prophet ridicules him thus in Salman Rushdie’s most controversial novel, Satanic Verses

“Lies! Lies! Lies!” is the reaction of Jesus on reading Mathew’s gospel in Kazantzakis’s novel, The Last Temptation of Christ.  Matthew tries to justify the lies he has written by saying that an angel dictates what he writes.  It is divine revelation.  How can lies be divine revelation?  Toward the end of Kazantzakis’s novel Matthew tells Jesus, “How masterfully I matched your words and deeds with the prophets!  It was terribly difficult, but I managed.  I used to say to myself that in the synagogues of the future the faithful would open thick tomes bound in gold and say, ‘The lesson for today is from the holy Gospel according to Matthew!’  This thought gave me wings and I wrote.”

We may never know whether that was indeed the real reason why Matthew wrote the gospel.  We may never know for sure how much of what Matthew wrote was what really happened and how much was imagined by the writer.  It is the case with most scriptures.

It is the case with any writing, in fact.  “I say one thing, you write another,” Kazantzakis’s Jesus accuses Matthew, “and those who read you understand still something else! ... Each of you attaches his own suffering, interests and desires to each of these sacred words, and my words disappear, m soul is lost.”

Every writer attaches his own feelings, interests and desires to what he writes, except maybe in purely objective subjects like the sciences.  Rushdie’s Satanic Verses is as much his personal reading into his religion as is Kazantzakis’s Last Temptation.  Both the writers were trying to understand their religion in their own personal way.  They have attached their own feelings, anxieties and desires to their novels and the characters in them.

If every reader reads every text keeping this fundamental fact in mind, the text will be understood more meaningfully.  The meaning is created by the reader.  When such creation takes place, fundamentalism will disappear. 

One cause of religious fundamentalism is the belief that the scriptures contain divine truths dictated or revealed by a god or an angel or any other supernatural entity.  Novelists like Rushdie and Kazantzakis show us quite a different truth.  And the truths of fiction may be truer than the truths of life, and quite definitely are truer than the truths of religions.

Comments

  1. Matheikal, when meaning is created at the level of the individual, what we would have is Protestantism, in a sense. And, that has been found to be no anathema to fundamentalism, the way I understand. I am sure I am wrong.

    Even if not exactly inscrutable, I pulled a thick tuft of hair from my head to understand the sentence that starts, "And the truths of fiction ...", the last sentence :)))) I have not yet understood, but I will stop here before losing all my hair! :)))))

    Said in the lightest spirit, the above is.

    RE

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Knowing your aversion to literature, I choose to desist from answering you, "Raghuram. Whereof one cannot speak, thereof one should be silent," I shall obey Wittgenstein.

      Delete
  2. rightly mentioned, when scriptures become divine better know that religious stubborness(without reasoning ) is born.once we become submissive to the extent that we define something or someone divine,we star fearing along with ! Its human ! Fear kills curiosity and where there is no questioning,means no freedom to think-more like animals and then a herd with passing generations... none allowed to question (because the ancestors told to do so )herd fears asking question and rather inculcates aggressive behaviour when someone questions them(they never had answers). How many Hindus know why Shivling is worshiped?Goes with all religion ! Only literacy would allow you to question and when you question - the herd gets angry .. after all its a herd !
    Must say , your approach on complicated topics, the simplicity and the reasoning with which you put your point makes me wait for your posts , Sir !!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, ignorance is bliss in religion and that's the greatest problem with it. As you say, it's true of every religion - unfortunately.

      Delete
  3. Rightly said everyone has right to express his feelings .

    Travel India

    ReplyDelete
  4. I simply don't understand how the concept of religion survived and actually evolved since thousands of years, that too without any logic and without any evidence. Can we get a PHD degree only based on hypothesis and without any logic or concrete evidence.

    Regards,
    Jahid
    Flashbacks

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Religion is born when logic fails! It's a leap into the dark, as someone said. Faith. I have written pretty much about its relevance. I'm going to write yet another blog on the same issue :) Expect it to be posted in an hour from now.

      Delete
  5. Very true. I believe that we should try to discover the GOD in us through a journey of self discovery rather than through books that can be interpreted in any way.

    http://blog.innerwearmatters.com

    ReplyDelete
  6. The passage I loved the best in the The Last Temptation was the part describing how Mathew wrote the gospel when everyone else has slept...toiling till dawn on many days, writing everything down before he forgets anything...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Kazantzakis being an excellent novelist creates characters who are complex and true to life. In the hands of lesser artists Matthew would have been a mere fabricator of history.

      Delete
  7. kazantakis is master of lyrical thought , though i have given up reading diminishing eyesight diabetes ..i hold kazantakis last passion of jesus christ as an inspirational novel that has been conducive to my growth as a humanbeing.. religion was created as a one side mirror .. you end up seeing yourself through god ...

    i shoot all religion but a religion that does not pay importance to humanity is not a religion to me at all i have lived with catholics jews hindus parsis all my life and everyone added a drop that made me a good human being..
    thanks for the votes .. for a man in a leaking boat

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ayodhya: Kingdom of Sorrows

T he Sarayu carried more tears than water. Ayodhya was a sad kingdom. Dasaratha was a good king. He upheld dharma – justice and morality – as best as he could. The citizens were apparently happy. Then, one day, it all changed. One person is enough to change the destiny of a whole kingdom. Who was that one person? Some say it was Kaikeyi, one of the three official wives of Dasaratha. Some others say it was Manthara, Kaikeyi’s chief maid. Manthara was a hunchback. She was the caretaker of Kaikeyi right from the latter’s childhood; foster mother, so to say, because Kaikeyi had no mother. The absence of maternal influence can distort a girl child’s personality. With a foster mother like Manthara, the distortion can be really bad. Manthara was cunning, selfish, and morally ambiguous. A severe physical deformity can make one worse than all that. Manthara was as devious and manipulative as a woman could be in a men’s world. Add to that all the jealousy and ambition that insecure peo...

Abdullah’s Religion

O Abdulla Renowned Malayalam movie actor Mohanlal recently offered special prayers for Mammootty, another equally renowned actor of Kerala. The ritual was performed at Sabarimala temple, one of the supreme Hindu pilgrimage centres in Kerala. No one in Kerala found anything wrong in Mohanlal, a Hindu, praying for Mammootty, a Muslim, to a Hindu deity. Malayalis were concerned about Mammootty’s wellbeing and were relieved to know that the actor wasn’t suffering from anything as serious as it appeared. Except O Abdulla. Who is this Abdulla? I had never heard of him until he created an unsavoury controversy about a Hindu praying for a Muslim. This man’s Facebook profile describes him as: “Former Professor Islahiaya, Media Critic, Ex-Interpreter of Indian Ambassador, Founder Member MADHYAMAM.” He has 108K followers on FB. As I was reading Malayalam weekly this morning, I came to know that this Abdulla is a former member of Jamaat-e-Islami Hind Kerala , a fundamentalist organisation. ...

Lucifer and some reflections

Let me start with a disclaimer: this is not a review of the Malayalam movie, Lucifer . These are some thoughts that came to my mind as I watched the movie today. However, just to give an idea about the movie: it’s a good entertainer with an engaging plot, Bollywood style settings, superman type violence in which the hero decimates the villains with pomp and show, and a spicy dance that is neatly tucked into the terribly orgasmic climax of the plot. The theme is highly relevant and that is what engaged me more. The role of certain mafia gangs in political governance is a theme that deserves to be examined in a good movie. In the movie, the mafia-politician nexus is busted and, like in our great myths, virtue triumphs over vice. Such a triumph is an artistic requirement. Real life, however, follows the principle of entropy: chaos flourishes with vengeance. Lucifer is the real winner in real life. The title of the movie as well as a final dialogue from the eponymous hero sugg...

Empuraan and Ramayana

Maggie and I will be watching the Malayalam movie Empuraan tomorrow. The tickets are booked. The movie has created a lot of controversy in Kerala and the director has decided to impose no less than 17 censors on it himself. I want to watch it before the jingoistic scissors find its way to the movie. It is surprising that the people of Kerala took such exception to this movie when the same people had no problem with the utterly malicious and mendacious movie The Kerala Story (2023). [My post on that movie, which I didn’t watch, is here .] Empuraan is based partly on the Gujarat riots of 2002. The riots were real and the BJP’s role in it (Mr Modi’s, in fact) is well-known. So, Empuraan isn’t giving the audience any falsehood as The Kerala Story did. Moreover, The Kerala Story maligned the people of Kerala while Empuraan is about something that happened in the faraway Gujarat quite long ago. Why are the people of Kerala then upset with Empuraan ? Because it tells the truth, M...

Empuraan – Review

Revenge is an ancient theme in human narratives. Give a moral rationale for the revenge and make the antagonist look monstrously evil, then you have the material for a good work of art. Add to that some spices from contemporary politics and the recipe is quite right for a hit movie. This is what you get in the Malayalam movie, Empuraan , which is running full houses now despite the trenchant opposition to it from the emergent Hindutva forces in the state. First of all, I fail to understand why so much brouhaha was hollered by the Hindutvans [let me coin that word for sheer convenience] who managed to get some 3 minutes censored from the 3-hour movie. The movie doesn’t make any explicit mention of any of the existing Hindutva political parties or other organisations. On the other hand, Allahu Akbar is shouted menacingly by Islamic terrorists, albeit towards the end. True, the movie begins with an implicit reference to what happened in Gujarat in 2002 after the Godhra train burnin...