Skip to main content

O Woman



One purpose of religions is to keep certain sections of people under subjugation. The easiest way of subjugating people is to give them rules and regulations in the name of their god(s). The caste system in India is an example. Another example is the place of women in society.

All major religions in the world have kept women under male domination. The Bible, for instance, begins with laying on the woman the whole onus for man’s sinfulness. Then came the various ‘fathers’ of the Church to reinforce that male domination with their divine revelations. Saint Paul, for example, was an incorrigible male chauvinist. 

Perhaps, no other religion is as misogynistic as the Catholic Church whose holy Patriarchs have time and again denounced woman as the cause of all human evils. Thomas Aquinas, whose philosophy and theology play a major role even today in the formation houses of Catholic priests, viewed woman as a “defective and misbegotten” creature born out of the defective part of the “man’s seed”. Saint Augustine denounced women as the “cause of hideous and involuntary erections in holy men” and prohibited women from being “educated or enlightened in any way”. Tertullian described woman as “the gate to hell”. Even Martin Luther, the reformer, was of the opinion that “women were made either to be wives or prostitutes.”

All three Semitic religions have similar views of women. Islam has mathematically established gender inequality. The Quran gives each male “the equal of the portion of two females” when it comes to property inheritance. While giving testimony too, two women are required to equal one man. There are places in the holy book where a woman is likened to the man’s land which he may use whichever way he chooses. The woman is nothing more than a piece of property. The only women you’ll find in the Muslim heaven are the virgins kept there for men’s enjoyment; all other women are in hell.

India’s own Hinduism is no better. Right from the Vedas, women remain men’s objects of pleasure. Women were not to be given knowledge, property, rights, etc. The woman has to be under the care of a man all the time: first the father, then husband, son, or relative – in that order of preference or possibility. Widows were always considered an inconvenient burden. They were responsible for the death of their husbands! They were considered inauspicious. They were encouraged to die on the funeral pyre of their husbands. If they chose to outlive their husbands, they were treated on a par with the untouchable people.

Our attitudes are shaped by our upbringing and religion plays a dominant role in that. This is one of the main reasons why women find it difficult to obtain equality in conservative societies. The solution is to alter traditions and certain undesirable aspects of cultures even if they are religious in origin. Changing culture and tradition is always a slow process, almost impossible if religions are involved. But we live in a world which demands such changes. Sooner than later, women will certainly become equal to men.

Gone are the days when men were the producers and women the reproducers. Now women are in the production line. Soon they will be firing the shots. The writing is on the wall if you care to read.  

PS. Written for In(di)spire Edition 247 #GenderEquity


Top post on IndiBlogger, the biggest community of Indian Bloggers

Comments

  1. I'm a man. I was impressed with your writing. It's just that you take a medieval perspective in this post.

    In modern era, I see many irrelevant ancient traditions that has been abandoned by millennial generations.
    Believe me, the progress of improvements in gender equality is on the right track, except in areas that were not civilized.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "except in areas that were not civilized" - I live in one such 'medieval' country where the ruler is like the ancient mythological gods.

      Delete
    2. India. Haven't you heard of our Narendra Modi?

      Delete
  2. In Hinduism women had right to read Vedas. There were women scholars like Gargi, Maitreyi etc. Unlike Abrahamic religions, Hinduism is a set of philosophical principles. True, interpretation of Hinduism has become narrow with time. Can we blame fire for burning when it also gives light? I also think you have mixed up philosophy and financial aspects.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Production and reproduction need not be financial all the time. Simone de Beauvoir philosophises them in her book The Second Sex.

      Delete
  3. Change is inevitable. We can already see changes. It will continue.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I don't care what the scriptures, the mythologies, and the ancient and middle ages writing say. I don't care what has been happening in the past. The truth is that even the past has hundreds of examples where women have been in the forefront... and yet, your post takes a strange course where it isn't the subjugation of women that is apparent but the fear in the hearts of men.

    The final paragraph is all about this fear that I have mentioned. I think women have always been the empathetic decision-maker in a family and this is still what happens. They are still the same.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You and I may not care for scripture and mythology. But too many seem to care. The present political system in the country has created the situation perhaps. Fear is due to politics.

      Delete
  5. I seriously have a lot to say but I don't know what to & where to start from.
    There's a lot going on in my mind after reading this post.
    I would just say that Women have done a lot in today's century but I don't think women have got that respect / worth they must.
    Thanks

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ayodhya: Kingdom of Sorrows

T he Sarayu carried more tears than water. Ayodhya was a sad kingdom. Dasaratha was a good king. He upheld dharma – justice and morality – as best as he could. The citizens were apparently happy. Then, one day, it all changed. One person is enough to change the destiny of a whole kingdom. Who was that one person? Some say it was Kaikeyi, one of the three official wives of Dasaratha. Some others say it was Manthara, Kaikeyi’s chief maid. Manthara was a hunchback. She was the caretaker of Kaikeyi right from the latter’s childhood; foster mother, so to say, because Kaikeyi had no mother. The absence of maternal influence can distort a girl child’s personality. With a foster mother like Manthara, the distortion can be really bad. Manthara was cunning, selfish, and morally ambiguous. A severe physical deformity can make one worse than all that. Manthara was as devious and manipulative as a woman could be in a men’s world. Add to that all the jealousy and ambition that insecure peo...

The Little Girl

The Little Girl is a short story by Katherine Mansfield given in the class 9 English course of NCERT. Maggie gave an assignment to her students based on the story and one of her students, Athena Baby Sabu, presented a brilliant job. She converted the story into a delightful comic strip. Mansfield tells the story of Kezia who is the eponymous little girl. Kezia is scared of her father who wields a lot of control on the entire family. She is punished severely for an unwitting mistake which makes her even more scared of her father. Her grandmother is fond of her and is her emotional succour. The grandmother is away from home one day with Kezia's mother who is hospitalised. Kezia gets her usual nightmare and is terrified. There is no one at home to console her except her father from whom she does not expect any consolation. But the father rises to the occasion and lets the little girl sleep beside him that night. She rests her head on her father's chest and can feel his heart...

Bharata: The Ascetic King

Bharata is disillusioned yet again. His brother, Rama the ideal man, Maryada Purushottam , is making yet another grotesque demand. Sita Devi has to prove her purity now, years after the Agni Pariksha she arranged for herself long ago in Lanka itself. Now, when she has been living for years far away from Rama with her two sons Luva and Kusha in the paternal care of no less a saint than Valmiki himself! What has happened to Rama? Bharata sits on the bank of the Sarayu with tears welling up in his eyes. Give me an answer, Sarayu, he said. Sarayu accepted Bharata’s tears too. She was used to absorbing tears. How many times has Rama come and sat upon this very same bank and wept too? Life is sorrow, Sarayu muttered to Bharata. Even if you are royal descendants of divinity itself. Rama had brought the children Luva and Kusha to Ayodhya on the day of the Ashvamedha Yagna which he was conducting in order to reaffirm his sovereignty and legitimacy over his kingdom. He didn’t know they w...

Liberated

Fiction - parable Vijay was familiar enough with soil and the stones it turns up to realise that he had struck something rare.   It was a tiny stone, a pitch black speck not larger than the tip of his little finger. It turned up from the intestine of the earth while Vijay was digging a pit for the biogas plant. Anand, the scientist from the village, got the stone analysed in his lab and assured, “It is a rare object.   A compound of carbonic acid and magnesium.” Anand and his fellow scientists believed that it must be a fragment of a meteoroid that hit the earth millions of years ago.   “Very rare indeed,” concluded the scientist. Now, it’s plain commonsense that something that’s very rare indeed must be very valuable too. All the more so if it came from the heavens. So Vijay got the village goldsmith to set it on a gold ring.   Vijay wore the ring proudly on his ring finger. Nobody, in the village, however bothered to pay any homage to Vijay’s...

Empuraan – Review

Revenge is an ancient theme in human narratives. Give a moral rationale for the revenge and make the antagonist look monstrously evil, then you have the material for a good work of art. Add to that some spices from contemporary politics and the recipe is quite right for a hit movie. This is what you get in the Malayalam movie, Empuraan , which is running full houses now despite the trenchant opposition to it from the emergent Hindutva forces in the state. First of all, I fail to understand why so much brouhaha was hollered by the Hindutvans [let me coin that word for sheer convenience] who managed to get some 3 minutes censored from the 3-hour movie. The movie doesn’t make any explicit mention of any of the existing Hindutva political parties or other organisations. On the other hand, Allahu Akbar is shouted menacingly by Islamic terrorists, albeit towards the end. True, the movie begins with an implicit reference to what happened in Gujarat in 2002 after the Godhra train burnin...