Skip to main content

O Woman



One purpose of religions is to keep certain sections of people under subjugation. The easiest way of subjugating people is to give them rules and regulations in the name of their god(s). The caste system in India is an example. Another example is the place of women in society.

All major religions in the world have kept women under male domination. The Bible, for instance, begins with laying on the woman the whole onus for man’s sinfulness. Then came the various ‘fathers’ of the Church to reinforce that male domination with their divine revelations. Saint Paul, for example, was an incorrigible male chauvinist. 

Perhaps, no other religion is as misogynistic as the Catholic Church whose holy Patriarchs have time and again denounced woman as the cause of all human evils. Thomas Aquinas, whose philosophy and theology play a major role even today in the formation houses of Catholic priests, viewed woman as a “defective and misbegotten” creature born out of the defective part of the “man’s seed”. Saint Augustine denounced women as the “cause of hideous and involuntary erections in holy men” and prohibited women from being “educated or enlightened in any way”. Tertullian described woman as “the gate to hell”. Even Martin Luther, the reformer, was of the opinion that “women were made either to be wives or prostitutes.”

All three Semitic religions have similar views of women. Islam has mathematically established gender inequality. The Quran gives each male “the equal of the portion of two females” when it comes to property inheritance. While giving testimony too, two women are required to equal one man. There are places in the holy book where a woman is likened to the man’s land which he may use whichever way he chooses. The woman is nothing more than a piece of property. The only women you’ll find in the Muslim heaven are the virgins kept there for men’s enjoyment; all other women are in hell.

India’s own Hinduism is no better. Right from the Vedas, women remain men’s objects of pleasure. Women were not to be given knowledge, property, rights, etc. The woman has to be under the care of a man all the time: first the father, then husband, son, or relative – in that order of preference or possibility. Widows were always considered an inconvenient burden. They were responsible for the death of their husbands! They were considered inauspicious. They were encouraged to die on the funeral pyre of their husbands. If they chose to outlive their husbands, they were treated on a par with the untouchable people.

Our attitudes are shaped by our upbringing and religion plays a dominant role in that. This is one of the main reasons why women find it difficult to obtain equality in conservative societies. The solution is to alter traditions and certain undesirable aspects of cultures even if they are religious in origin. Changing culture and tradition is always a slow process, almost impossible if religions are involved. But we live in a world which demands such changes. Sooner than later, women will certainly become equal to men.

Gone are the days when men were the producers and women the reproducers. Now women are in the production line. Soon they will be firing the shots. The writing is on the wall if you care to read.  

PS. Written for In(di)spire Edition 247 #GenderEquity


Top post on IndiBlogger, the biggest community of Indian Bloggers

Comments

  1. I'm a man. I was impressed with your writing. It's just that you take a medieval perspective in this post.

    In modern era, I see many irrelevant ancient traditions that has been abandoned by millennial generations.
    Believe me, the progress of improvements in gender equality is on the right track, except in areas that were not civilized.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "except in areas that were not civilized" - I live in one such 'medieval' country where the ruler is like the ancient mythological gods.

      Delete
    2. India. Haven't you heard of our Narendra Modi?

      Delete
  2. In Hinduism women had right to read Vedas. There were women scholars like Gargi, Maitreyi etc. Unlike Abrahamic religions, Hinduism is a set of philosophical principles. True, interpretation of Hinduism has become narrow with time. Can we blame fire for burning when it also gives light? I also think you have mixed up philosophy and financial aspects.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Production and reproduction need not be financial all the time. Simone de Beauvoir philosophises them in her book The Second Sex.

      Delete
  3. Change is inevitable. We can already see changes. It will continue.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I don't care what the scriptures, the mythologies, and the ancient and middle ages writing say. I don't care what has been happening in the past. The truth is that even the past has hundreds of examples where women have been in the forefront... and yet, your post takes a strange course where it isn't the subjugation of women that is apparent but the fear in the hearts of men.

    The final paragraph is all about this fear that I have mentioned. I think women have always been the empathetic decision-maker in a family and this is still what happens. They are still the same.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You and I may not care for scripture and mythology. But too many seem to care. The present political system in the country has created the situation perhaps. Fear is due to politics.

      Delete
  5. I seriously have a lot to say but I don't know what to & where to start from.
    There's a lot going on in my mind after reading this post.
    I would just say that Women have done a lot in today's century but I don't think women have got that respect / worth they must.
    Thanks

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ayodhya: Kingdom of Sorrows

T he Sarayu carried more tears than water. Ayodhya was a sad kingdom. Dasaratha was a good king. He upheld dharma – justice and morality – as best as he could. The citizens were apparently happy. Then, one day, it all changed. One person is enough to change the destiny of a whole kingdom. Who was that one person? Some say it was Kaikeyi, one of the three official wives of Dasaratha. Some others say it was Manthara, Kaikeyi’s chief maid. Manthara was a hunchback. She was the caretaker of Kaikeyi right from the latter’s childhood; foster mother, so to say, because Kaikeyi had no mother. The absence of maternal influence can distort a girl child’s personality. With a foster mother like Manthara, the distortion can be really bad. Manthara was cunning, selfish, and morally ambiguous. A severe physical deformity can make one worse than all that. Manthara was as devious and manipulative as a woman could be in a men’s world. Add to that all the jealousy and ambition that insecure peo...

Lucifer and some reflections

Let me start with a disclaimer: this is not a review of the Malayalam movie, Lucifer . These are some thoughts that came to my mind as I watched the movie today. However, just to give an idea about the movie: it’s a good entertainer with an engaging plot, Bollywood style settings, superman type violence in which the hero decimates the villains with pomp and show, and a spicy dance that is neatly tucked into the terribly orgasmic climax of the plot. The theme is highly relevant and that is what engaged me more. The role of certain mafia gangs in political governance is a theme that deserves to be examined in a good movie. In the movie, the mafia-politician nexus is busted and, like in our great myths, virtue triumphs over vice. Such a triumph is an artistic requirement. Real life, however, follows the principle of entropy: chaos flourishes with vengeance. Lucifer is the real winner in real life. The title of the movie as well as a final dialogue from the eponymous hero sugg...

Abdullah’s Religion

O Abdulla Renowned Malayalam movie actor Mohanlal recently offered special prayers for Mammootty, another equally renowned actor of Kerala. The ritual was performed at Sabarimala temple, one of the supreme Hindu pilgrimage centres in Kerala. No one in Kerala found anything wrong in Mohanlal, a Hindu, praying for Mammootty, a Muslim, to a Hindu deity. Malayalis were concerned about Mammootty’s wellbeing and were relieved to know that the actor wasn’t suffering from anything as serious as it appeared. Except O Abdulla. Who is this Abdulla? I had never heard of him until he created an unsavoury controversy about a Hindu praying for a Muslim. This man’s Facebook profile describes him as: “Former Professor Islahiaya, Media Critic, Ex-Interpreter of Indian Ambassador, Founder Member MADHYAMAM.” He has 108K followers on FB. As I was reading Malayalam weekly this morning, I came to know that this Abdulla is a former member of Jamaat-e-Islami Hind Kerala , a fundamentalist organisation. ...

Empuraan and Ramayana

Maggie and I will be watching the Malayalam movie Empuraan tomorrow. The tickets are booked. The movie has created a lot of controversy in Kerala and the director has decided to impose no less than 17 censors on it himself. I want to watch it before the jingoistic scissors find its way to the movie. It is surprising that the people of Kerala took such exception to this movie when the same people had no problem with the utterly malicious and mendacious movie The Kerala Story (2023). [My post on that movie, which I didn’t watch, is here .] Empuraan is based partly on the Gujarat riots of 2002. The riots were real and the BJP’s role in it (Mr Modi’s, in fact) is well-known. So, Empuraan isn’t giving the audience any falsehood as The Kerala Story did. Moreover, The Kerala Story maligned the people of Kerala while Empuraan is about something that happened in the faraway Gujarat quite long ago. Why are the people of Kerala then upset with Empuraan ? Because it tells the truth, M...

Empuraan – Review

Revenge is an ancient theme in human narratives. Give a moral rationale for the revenge and make the antagonist look monstrously evil, then you have the material for a good work of art. Add to that some spices from contemporary politics and the recipe is quite right for a hit movie. This is what you get in the Malayalam movie, Empuraan , which is running full houses now despite the trenchant opposition to it from the emergent Hindutva forces in the state. First of all, I fail to understand why so much brouhaha was hollered by the Hindutvans [let me coin that word for sheer convenience] who managed to get some 3 minutes censored from the 3-hour movie. The movie doesn’t make any explicit mention of any of the existing Hindutva political parties or other organisations. On the other hand, Allahu Akbar is shouted menacingly by Islamic terrorists, albeit towards the end. True, the movie begins with an implicit reference to what happened in Gujarat in 2002 after the Godhra train burnin...