Skip to main content

When citizens seek death


Guj’s Muslim fishermen seek mass euthanasia.’ The headline in today’s New Indian Express is rather unnerving. The issue raises two questions. (1) Is the government meant only for a particular community of people? (2) Can euthanasia be permitted?

Whose India?

India has a Prime Minister who revelled in making statements against a particular community while he was a chief minister. When he became the PM, he stopped making such public utterances which were not only crude but also subhuman. But his attitude towards that community hasn’t undergone any improvement. In fact, he seems to think that India is meant only for one particular community. Mr Modi loves to travel all over the world and suggest solutions to international problems and environmental disasters. But back home, he is as parochial as a dog in its alley. This is the reason why the Muslim fishermen in Gujarat, Modi’s own state, seek death. They know that their future is bleak as long as Modi’s party remains in power. And the party will remain in power for quite some time, for all we know.

The Modi government has written off corporate loans amounting to eight lakh crores. That’s a huge amount, undoubtedly. Very huge, in fact. In the same country where the affluent people get such favours from Modi, poor people like farmers and fisherfolk are driven to suicide by denial of survival supports. Long ago, I wrote in this same space that Mr Modi’s strategy for eradicating poverty was eradication of the poor. Who does Modi really care for? The question is worth asking again and again. To whom does India belong under Modi’s pontificate?

Choose one’s death?

Can people be allowed to choose their death? I have written earlier in defence of euthanasia. I would certainly like to choose my death when I realise that my further life is pointless. I am a fervent supporter of euthanasia. But in the present case, where a community of people ask for the right to kill themselves because they are let down by their own government, there is something drastically wrong. It is a clear and sad indicator of the government’s failure to look after its own citizens. I won’t support that sort of euthanasia.

There are many places where the poor are being neglected by both state and central governments. Even Kerala which boasts of high standards of living has areas where people live in abject poverty. Attappadi is one. Infant mortality rate in that place of Adivasis is higher than the national average. The national infant mortality rate is 27. What it means is out of every 1000 infants born in the country 27 succumb to death before the age of one. Kerala’s infant mortality rate is an enviable 6. But in Kerala’s Attappadi, the rate is 32. 

A pregnant woman being taken to hospital in Attappadi

What Kerala is doing to the Adivasis of Attappadi is what Modi is doing to Muslims in the country. Some people are driven to their deaths by their own governments! Is it any wonder then if such people demand the right to die en masse?

We know that no court is going to give any people the permission to embrace death as a community. But the very demand made by the people should open the eyes of the government to certain harsh and painful realities in the country.

 

 

Comments

  1. Hari OM
    What painful reading... and one would observe that this is not a request for euthanasia at all (which is mercy killing of an individual in severe pain and irreversible health condition with death as its end anyway). It is, instead, a plea for mass suicide (which is sacrifice of one's life as no other option for relief from mental agony appears available). If this community is serious about their request, they will go ahead anyway. The intent here, though, appears to be raising the matter to as large an audience as possible. It is a politically sound alert to government, and society in general, that conditions are in a parlous state for this group. One holds one's breath wondering how it could even have reached this stage and what, in fact, the court will say about it... YAM xx
    A2Z Reflection

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This request from the fisherfolk is a desperate means to draw the attention of the government to their miserable plight. Will the government care? What will the court do? I'm not quite optimistic.

      Delete
  2. Wonder if their dying throes of pain will ever be heard by the political who's who. Tragic state of affairs. Ethnic cleansing.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, ethnic cleansing is happening though slowly and deviously.

      Delete
  3. What a world, cheering up the sweet- talker politicians and give them credit on the world stages, not really caring for what gruesome life tragedies they send people under their administration like mass suicide. In Kerala, the rulers take regular flights to the developed nation to get better treatments leaving the children of the people pushed to live in dismal facilities to die. What a Shame!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Utter shame indeed. Our leaders are like vampires feeding on our blood.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ayodhya: Kingdom of Sorrows

T he Sarayu carried more tears than water. Ayodhya was a sad kingdom. Dasaratha was a good king. He upheld dharma – justice and morality – as best as he could. The citizens were apparently happy. Then, one day, it all changed. One person is enough to change the destiny of a whole kingdom. Who was that one person? Some say it was Kaikeyi, one of the three official wives of Dasaratha. Some others say it was Manthara, Kaikeyi’s chief maid. Manthara was a hunchback. She was the caretaker of Kaikeyi right from the latter’s childhood; foster mother, so to say, because Kaikeyi had no mother. The absence of maternal influence can distort a girl child’s personality. With a foster mother like Manthara, the distortion can be really bad. Manthara was cunning, selfish, and morally ambiguous. A severe physical deformity can make one worse than all that. Manthara was as devious and manipulative as a woman could be in a men’s world. Add to that all the jealousy and ambition that insecure peo...

The Little Girl

The Little Girl is a short story by Katherine Mansfield given in the class 9 English course of NCERT. Maggie gave an assignment to her students based on the story and one of her students, Athena Baby Sabu, presented a brilliant job. She converted the story into a delightful comic strip. Mansfield tells the story of Kezia who is the eponymous little girl. Kezia is scared of her father who wields a lot of control on the entire family. She is punished severely for an unwitting mistake which makes her even more scared of her father. Her grandmother is fond of her and is her emotional succour. The grandmother is away from home one day with Kezia's mother who is hospitalised. Kezia gets her usual nightmare and is terrified. There is no one at home to console her except her father from whom she does not expect any consolation. But the father rises to the occasion and lets the little girl sleep beside him that night. She rests her head on her father's chest and can feel his heart...

Bharata: The Ascetic King

Bharata is disillusioned yet again. His brother, Rama the ideal man, Maryada Purushottam , is making yet another grotesque demand. Sita Devi has to prove her purity now, years after the Agni Pariksha she arranged for herself long ago in Lanka itself. Now, when she has been living for years far away from Rama with her two sons Luva and Kusha in the paternal care of no less a saint than Valmiki himself! What has happened to Rama? Bharata sits on the bank of the Sarayu with tears welling up in his eyes. Give me an answer, Sarayu, he said. Sarayu accepted Bharata’s tears too. She was used to absorbing tears. How many times has Rama come and sat upon this very same bank and wept too? Life is sorrow, Sarayu muttered to Bharata. Even if you are royal descendants of divinity itself. Rama had brought the children Luva and Kusha to Ayodhya on the day of the Ashvamedha Yagna which he was conducting in order to reaffirm his sovereignty and legitimacy over his kingdom. He didn’t know they w...

Liberated

Fiction - parable Vijay was familiar enough with soil and the stones it turns up to realise that he had struck something rare.   It was a tiny stone, a pitch black speck not larger than the tip of his little finger. It turned up from the intestine of the earth while Vijay was digging a pit for the biogas plant. Anand, the scientist from the village, got the stone analysed in his lab and assured, “It is a rare object.   A compound of carbonic acid and magnesium.” Anand and his fellow scientists believed that it must be a fragment of a meteoroid that hit the earth millions of years ago.   “Very rare indeed,” concluded the scientist. Now, it’s plain commonsense that something that’s very rare indeed must be very valuable too. All the more so if it came from the heavens. So Vijay got the village goldsmith to set it on a gold ring.   Vijay wore the ring proudly on his ring finger. Nobody, in the village, however bothered to pay any homage to Vijay’s...

Dharma and Destiny

  Illustration by Copilot Designer Unwavering adherence to dharma causes much suffering in the Ramayana . Dharma can mean duty, righteousness, and moral order. There are many characters in the Ramayana who stick to their dharma as best as they can and cause much pain to themselves as well as others. Dasharatha sees it as his duty as a ruler (raja-dharma) to uphold truth and justice and hence has to fulfil the promise he made to Kaikeyi and send Rama into exile in spite of the anguish it causes him and many others. Rama accepts the order following his dharma as an obedient son. Sita follows her dharma as a wife and enters the forest along with her husband. The brotherly dharma of Lakshmana makes him leave his own wife and escort Rama and Sita. It’s all not that simple, however. Which dharma makes Rama suspect Sita’s purity, later in Lanka? Which dharma makes him succumb to a societal expectation instead of upholding his personal integrity, still later in Ayodhya? “You were car...