Skip to main content

Grandeur of the dooms

John Keats by William Hilton [Wikipedia]


One of the poems included in CBSE’s class 12 English literature is an extract from Keats’ Endymion. A question that has come to me again and again from students as well as teachers is: What does “the grandeur of the dooms…” mean? It is a line that has perplexed me too. I have been amused by the kind of interpretations given in the guidebooks for students. Quite many of these books interpret the word ‘dooms’ to mean the Doomsday. Look at the following answer given in one such guidebook made available online by a well-known educational establishment. 

That is very amusing considering the fact that Keats was an agnostic, if not a confirmed atheist. Keats would never accept a God who would come riding a majestic cloud on the day of the Last Judgment to apportion the good and the evil souls to Heaven and Hell. Evil is an integral part of life, Keats knew too well. No human can avoid evil any more than “a rose can avoid a blighting wind.” How do you believe in a benevolent Supreme Being who cares for his creation in a world where evil is predominant?

If Keats cared to establish a religion, its deity would have been Beauty. Didn’t he tell us that “Beauty is truth, truth beauty”? He even went to the extent of saying that we don’t need to know anything more than that. For Keats, beauty is divine. Beauty is the ultimate answer to all the mysteries and riddles of life.

The extract given in class 12 by CBSE is a paean to beauty. “A thing of beauty is a joy forever,” it begins. The first few lines describe the blessings of beauty. Beauty is a special place (bower) prepared for us by nature. It brings us peace and relaxation, good sleep and sweet dreams, good health and blissful happiness. Beauty brings us endless joy. Nothing else can do that. Not religion, not gods, let alone other ephemeral things.

In order to enjoy the blessings of beauty, we bind ourselves to the earth with a band of flowers which we “wreath” every day. There is much sadness on earth, however. All that sadness is a creation of human beings. Despondence, lack of noble people, gloom, evils that we perpetrate… We create all that sadness. And that sadness puts us on a quest for happiness!

Then the poet goes on to give us a list of things that bring happiness. All those things belong to nature. Sun, moon, daffodils, streams, trees… And finally some human-made beauty too: literature – “All lovely tales that we have heard or read”. It is here that “the grandeur of the dooms” appears.

Look at the lines:

And such too is the grandeur of the dooms

We have imagined for the mighty dead…

The ‘mighty dead’ are our past heroes about whom we weave beautiful stories in our poems and epics and other works of literature. These works of literature, along with the numerous beautiful things in nature, become “An endless fountain of immortal drink,” the fountain of joy for the questing human soul. This beauty is immortal, divine - coming from "heaven's brink". It will go on without end, without death. Nature will keep giving us beauty and generations of humans will keep writing good literature.

So what does the phrase ‘grandeur of the dooms’ mean? It means the glory of the deaths that we have imagined for our bygone heroes. That is, ‘doom’ translates as ‘death’. Our literatures have imagined the glory in the deaths of those heroes and made those deaths beautiful.

Death cannot be glorious or beautiful. But art has the power to render them majestic. “Et tu, Brute? Then fall, Caesar.” How beautiful that death is! Who but Shakespeare could have made it so beautiful? Look at Othello’s final moments with Desdemona: “Put out the light, then put out the light.” The final cry of Conrad’s Kurtz – “The horror! The horror!” – has the same sublime touch though that character was not exactly heroic.

Keats died at the beautiful age of 25. Too early for any human being to die. He had achieved remarkable success in that very short lifespan. Not as a surgeon that he had educated himself to be but as the High Priest of Beauty. Though ‘success’ came to him posthumously. In his lifetime very few people appreciated his poems. Better known poets like Byron ridiculed Keats’ poetry as onanism, intellectual masturbation.

Keats died a sad death. Can death be anything but sad? But in Keats’ case, it was the tragic premature death of a questing genius who had so much to contribute to literature. Some Shakespeare may yet be born to convert that tragedy into the “grandeur of a doom…”

Keats' tombstone
"Here lies one whose name was writ in water."

x

 

Comments

  1. Hari OM
    Keats, I like to think, will be nodding approvingly of this take on his words, from whichever part of his 'doom' permits it! YAM xx

    ReplyDelete
  2. This is such an informative post! You’ve clearly put a lot of effort into researching this, and it shows. I’m bookmarking this for future reference!

    Please visit my sit also:
    top 10 schools in Chennai

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ayodhya: Kingdom of Sorrows

T he Sarayu carried more tears than water. Ayodhya was a sad kingdom. Dasaratha was a good king. He upheld dharma – justice and morality – as best as he could. The citizens were apparently happy. Then, one day, it all changed. One person is enough to change the destiny of a whole kingdom. Who was that one person? Some say it was Kaikeyi, one of the three official wives of Dasaratha. Some others say it was Manthara, Kaikeyi’s chief maid. Manthara was a hunchback. She was the caretaker of Kaikeyi right from the latter’s childhood; foster mother, so to say, because Kaikeyi had no mother. The absence of maternal influence can distort a girl child’s personality. With a foster mother like Manthara, the distortion can be really bad. Manthara was cunning, selfish, and morally ambiguous. A severe physical deformity can make one worse than all that. Manthara was as devious and manipulative as a woman could be in a men’s world. Add to that all the jealousy and ambition that insecure peo...

Abdullah’s Religion

O Abdulla Renowned Malayalam movie actor Mohanlal recently offered special prayers for Mammootty, another equally renowned actor of Kerala. The ritual was performed at Sabarimala temple, one of the supreme Hindu pilgrimage centres in Kerala. No one in Kerala found anything wrong in Mohanlal, a Hindu, praying for Mammootty, a Muslim, to a Hindu deity. Malayalis were concerned about Mammootty’s wellbeing and were relieved to know that the actor wasn’t suffering from anything as serious as it appeared. Except O Abdulla. Who is this Abdulla? I had never heard of him until he created an unsavoury controversy about a Hindu praying for a Muslim. This man’s Facebook profile describes him as: “Former Professor Islahiaya, Media Critic, Ex-Interpreter of Indian Ambassador, Founder Member MADHYAMAM.” He has 108K followers on FB. As I was reading Malayalam weekly this morning, I came to know that this Abdulla is a former member of Jamaat-e-Islami Hind Kerala , a fundamentalist organisation. ...

Lucifer and some reflections

Let me start with a disclaimer: this is not a review of the Malayalam movie, Lucifer . These are some thoughts that came to my mind as I watched the movie today. However, just to give an idea about the movie: it’s a good entertainer with an engaging plot, Bollywood style settings, superman type violence in which the hero decimates the villains with pomp and show, and a spicy dance that is neatly tucked into the terribly orgasmic climax of the plot. The theme is highly relevant and that is what engaged me more. The role of certain mafia gangs in political governance is a theme that deserves to be examined in a good movie. In the movie, the mafia-politician nexus is busted and, like in our great myths, virtue triumphs over vice. Such a triumph is an artistic requirement. Real life, however, follows the principle of entropy: chaos flourishes with vengeance. Lucifer is the real winner in real life. The title of the movie as well as a final dialogue from the eponymous hero sugg...

Empuraan and Ramayana

Maggie and I will be watching the Malayalam movie Empuraan tomorrow. The tickets are booked. The movie has created a lot of controversy in Kerala and the director has decided to impose no less than 17 censors on it himself. I want to watch it before the jingoistic scissors find its way to the movie. It is surprising that the people of Kerala took such exception to this movie when the same people had no problem with the utterly malicious and mendacious movie The Kerala Story (2023). [My post on that movie, which I didn’t watch, is here .] Empuraan is based partly on the Gujarat riots of 2002. The riots were real and the BJP’s role in it (Mr Modi’s, in fact) is well-known. So, Empuraan isn’t giving the audience any falsehood as The Kerala Story did. Moreover, The Kerala Story maligned the people of Kerala while Empuraan is about something that happened in the faraway Gujarat quite long ago. Why are the people of Kerala then upset with Empuraan ? Because it tells the truth, M...

Empuraan – Review

Revenge is an ancient theme in human narratives. Give a moral rationale for the revenge and make the antagonist look monstrously evil, then you have the material for a good work of art. Add to that some spices from contemporary politics and the recipe is quite right for a hit movie. This is what you get in the Malayalam movie, Empuraan , which is running full houses now despite the trenchant opposition to it from the emergent Hindutva forces in the state. First of all, I fail to understand why so much brouhaha was hollered by the Hindutvans [let me coin that word for sheer convenience] who managed to get some 3 minutes censored from the 3-hour movie. The movie doesn’t make any explicit mention of any of the existing Hindutva political parties or other organisations. On the other hand, Allahu Akbar is shouted menacingly by Islamic terrorists, albeit towards the end. True, the movie begins with an implicit reference to what happened in Gujarat in 2002 after the Godhra train burnin...