Skip to main content

War and Peace


The Global Peace Index 2024 reports that 92 countries are currently engaged in conflicts beyond their borders, marking the highest number since World War II. The latest conflict between India and Pakistan is not included in that statistic.

What do these wars achieve? As Palestinian poet Mahmoud Darwish wrote, “The old woman will keep waiting for her martyred son. That girl will wait for her beloved husband. And those children will wait for their heroic father.” The leaders will shake hands, he said. History will be rewritten. New heroes will be born. But the ordinary citizens pay the price for every war.

Wars kill people, first of all. World War II killed 70 to 85 million people. Millions of people are displaced by wars. The present Ukrainian crisis alone has displaced more than 14 million people from their homes, 6 million of them are refugees in other countries. Famine and starvation are the next problems. The endless civil war in Yemen, for example, has driven 17 million people to food insecurity.

The collapse of infrastructure is all too obvious. Many of my fellow country-people must have watched on their TV screens how houses and other buildings came crashing down to dust in the past few days both in India and Pakistan. Environment bleeds too. Forests burn, rivers are polluted, and a huge lot of toxic remnants are left behind.

A staggering portion of human creativity, intellectual energy, and material resources is consumed by war. Just imagine that: we spend a huge proportion of our wealth, potential, and resources for killing one another. In 2023, the human world spent $2.4 trillion on defence. This amount could fund global education, eliminate hunger, and provide clean water many times over.

As Pope Francis wrote in his autobiography, “If no weapons were manufactured for a year, the world’s hunger would completely end; one single day without military spending would save thirty-four million people…”

Imagine the world using science and technology for good purposes instead of developing sophisticated weapons and drones and war-robotics… We could prevent so much crime by using the surveillance systems in better ways than for wars.

As Albert Einstein said, “The unleashed power of the atom has changed everything, save our modes of thinking, and thus we drift toward unparalleled catastrophe.” We need to change our modes of thinking. Pope Francis put it this way: “We must replace the cowardice of arms with the courage of reconciliation.”

Reconciliation ultimately depends on courageous leadership—leaders willing to take political risks and challenge hardline narratives. Leaders willing to let go certain pet themes like nationalism and religion.

Comments

  1. Hari OM
    Thank you... for the stats, the courage to call it out. I look at our line up here in the UK and yet again... despair... but at least, for now, we are not under the threat of broken buildings, limbs, lives... YAM xx

    ReplyDelete
  2. Wars are to feed the egos of the powerful. Saddening,

    ReplyDelete
  3. “If no weapons were manufactured for a year, the world’s hunger would completely end; one single day without military spending would save thirty-four million people…”

    I mean, that sounds good. I wish it were true. But sadly, if no weapons were manufactured for a year, they would find something else to do with that money rather than feed people. Too many people are destructive.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Too much negativity and violence. That's the sad truth.

      Delete
  4. Thanks for the morning Meditation. A very soulful and elevating piece... Added beauty is that I am reading it, while sojourning under your very roof. To mirror and echo the Palestinian poet, I quote Tennyson" The nobles fought, the clergy prayed and the people paid.."

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It was our pleasure to have you with us.

      Tennyson is so apt!

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Adventures of Toto as a comic strip

  'The Adventures of Toto' is an amusing story by Ruskin Bond. It is prescribed as a lesson in CBSE's English course for class 9. Maggie asked her students to do a project on some of the lessons and Femi George's work is what I would like to present here. Femi converted the story into a beautiful comic strip. Her work will speak for itself and let me present it below.  Femi George Student of Carmel Public School, Vazhakulam, Kerala Similar post: The Little Girl

The Little Girl

The Little Girl is a short story by Katherine Mansfield given in the class 9 English course of NCERT. Maggie gave an assignment to her students based on the story and one of her students, Athena Baby Sabu, presented a brilliant job. She converted the story into a delightful comic strip. Mansfield tells the story of Kezia who is the eponymous little girl. Kezia is scared of her father who wields a lot of control on the entire family. She is punished severely for an unwitting mistake which makes her even more scared of her father. Her grandmother is fond of her and is her emotional succour. The grandmother is away from home one day with Kezia's mother who is hospitalised. Kezia gets her usual nightmare and is terrified. There is no one at home to console her except her father from whom she does not expect any consolation. But the father rises to the occasion and lets the little girl sleep beside him that night. She rests her head on her father's chest and can feel his heart...

Two Women and Their Frustrations

Illustration by Gemini AI Nora and Millie are two unforgettable women in literature. Both are frustrated with their married life, though Nora’s frustration is a late experience. How they deal with their personal situations is worth a deep study. One redeems herself while the other destroys herself as well as her husband. Nora is the protagonist of Henrik Ibsen’s play, A Doll’s House , and Millie is her counterpart in Terence Rattigan’s play, The Browning Version . [The links take you to the respective text.] Personal frustration leads one to growth into an enlightened selfhood while it embitters the other. Nora’s story is emancipatory and Millie’s is destructive. Nora questions patriarchal oppression and liberates herself from it with equanimity, while Millie is trapped in a meaningless relationship. Since I have summarised these plays in earlier posts, now I’m moving on to a discussion on the enlightening contrasts between these two characters. If you’re interested in the plot ...

Hindutva’s Contradictions

The book I’m reading now is Whose Rama? [in Malayalam] by Sanskrit scholar and professor T S Syamkumar. I had mentioned this book in an earlier post . The basic premise of the book, as I understand from the initial pages, is that Hindutva is a Brahminical ideology that keeps the lower caste people outside its terrain. Non-Aryans are portrayed as monsters in ancient Hindu literature. The Shudras, the lowest caste, and the casteless others, are not even granted the status of humans.  Whose Rama? The August issue of The Caravan carries an article related to the inhuman treatment that the Brahmins of Etawah in Uttar Pradesh meted out to a Yadav “preacher” in the last week of June 2025. “Yadavs are traditionally ranked as a Shudra community,” says the article. They are not supposed to recite the holy texts. Mukut Mani Singh Yadav was reciting verses from the Bhagavad Gita. That was his crime. The Brahmins of the locality got the man’s head tonsured, forced him to rub his nose at t...

The Real Enemies of India

People in general are inclined to pass the blame on to others whatever the fault.  For example, we Indians love to blame the British for their alleged ‘divide-and-rule’ policy.  Did the British really divide India into Hindus and Muslims or did the Indians do it themselves?  Was there any unified entity called India in the first place before the British unified it? Having raised those questions, I’m going to commit a further sacrilege of quoting a British journalist-cum-historian.  In his magnum opus, India: a History , John Keay says that the “stock accusations of a wider Machiavellian intent to ‘divide and rule’ and to ‘stir up Hindu-Muslim animosity’” levelled against the British Raj made little sense when the freedom struggle was going on in India because there really was no unified India until the British unified it politically.  Communal divisions existed in India despite the political unification.  In fact, they existed even before the Briti...