Skip to main content

Average Problems


Here’s why you shouldn’t walk on escalators is one of the headlines in today’s Times of India.  The report, written by Christopher Mele and originally published in New York Times two days back, is an excellent example of how statistics and mathematics can create imaginary worlds which appear real. 

Take an example.  Suppose a man wants to calculate the average income of people living on Altamount Road in Mumbai.  He will arrive at a figure which will astound almost all the people living there until they realise that Mukesh Ambani’s house, Antilia, is also situated on their road. 

From the New York Times
The researcher in Mele’s report did just that.  Let me simplify the findings.  Imagine yourself in a metro railway station which has escalators. Don’t imagine Connaught Place in Delhi whose escalators are so overcrowded at any time that nobody can even dream of walking up or down any of those escalators.  Imagine a sparsely populated metro station.

There are ten passengers on an escalator.  Two of them are walking up in order to save time while 8 are standing steady for the escalator to reach them atop.  The one who stands still takes 30 seconds to reach the top while the one who walks on the escalator takes 15 seconds.  Now, what’s the average time taken by a random passenger? 

Average time = Total time ÷ Number of passengers.
Total time = (30x8) + (15x2) = 270 seconds
Number of passengers = 8+2 = 10
Therefore, average time = 270÷10 = 27 seconds

Now, imagine 4 passengers are walking and 6 are standing still.  The average time will reduce to 24 seconds.

As the number of walkers increases, the average time will decrease.  Can we then say that the standers lose more time as the number of walkers increases?

The report makes a similar claim.  “When 40% of the people walked, the average time for standers was 138 seconds and 46 seconds for the walkers,” says the report. “When everyone stood, the average time fell to 59 seconds.  For walkers, that meant losing 13 seconds but for standers, it was a 79-second improvement.”  So walkers stand to lose!

Got the logic?  If you didn’t, don’t worry.  Such logic makes up a lot of reality in our world.  For example, economic statistics.  Our government gives us this kind of averages to show how much our economic standard has improved.  And you may be left wondering where the improvement is seen in your personal life.  Now you know where the improvement actually lies.




Comments

  1. Jyotirmoy SarkarApril 7, 2017 at 10:00 AM

    Did not get the logic as well as the improvement in my personal life as shown by the economic statistics.
    Very nice post.

    ReplyDelete
  2. RakeshApril 7, 2017 at 11:58 AM

    Law of averages is only helpful to casinos. We can never handle people by that law. And, if we consider it gospel and make rules according to that, we are in for a huge surprise. Which is what today's politicians doing. Blindingly following something, which they don't really understand.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Tomichan MatheikalApril 7, 2017 at 12:07 PM

      “Statement: A girl and a boy jump into a river. The boy swims over to the girl and says, "God, it's cold."
      Question: What's the probability they will kiss?”
      ― Jenny Downham, You Against Me

      Life's relation to statistics is as good as that :)

      Delete
    2. RakeshApril 7, 2017 at 12:43 PM

      Hahahah! Absolutely my thoughts! A statistician is the Rahul Gandhi of science! I'm more of factual data oriented. Statistics is just to present an average picture. Unfortunately, nowadays people treat it as the whole truth!

      Delete
  3. Pranju chakrapaniApril 7, 2017 at 12:48 PM

    There is also a theory called wisdom of the crowd. As the opinion of the majority of the crowd tends to a common point the truth shifts towards that point. The outliers at both the extremes cancel each other. Your take? :)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Tomichan MatheikalApril 7, 2017 at 8:15 PM

      Absolutely. Psychology has a technical term for that crowd wisdom though I can't recall it now. I have seen people standing still on the escalators in Delhi's metro stations until one young lad or lass makes the first move. Once the first move is made many more follow. The crowd mentality is not very visible on escalators because of logistical and other reasons. But it is there.

      Outliers belong to a different category, always. Even if they don't cancel each other, they make little difference in the social behaviours.

      Delete
  4. MoonApril 7, 2017 at 9:12 PM

    :D Awesome post!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Adventures of Toto as a comic strip

  'The Adventures of Toto' is an amusing story by Ruskin Bond. It is prescribed as a lesson in CBSE's English course for class 9. Maggie asked her students to do a project on some of the lessons and Femi George's work is what I would like to present here. Femi converted the story into a beautiful comic strip. Her work will speak for itself and let me present it below.  Femi George Student of Carmel Public School, Vazhakulam, Kerala Similar post: The Little Girl
47 comments
Read more

The Real Enemies of India

People in general are inclined to pass the blame on to others whatever the fault.  For example, we Indians love to blame the British for their alleged ‘divide-and-rule’ policy.  Did the British really divide India into Hindus and Muslims or did the Indians do it themselves?  Was there any unified entity called India in the first place before the British unified it? Having raised those questions, I’m going to commit a further sacrilege of quoting a British journalist-cum-historian.  In his magnum opus, India: a History , John Keay says that the “stock accusations of a wider Machiavellian intent to ‘divide and rule’ and to ‘stir up Hindu-Muslim animosity’” levelled against the British Raj made little sense when the freedom struggle was going on in India because there really was no unified India until the British unified it politically.  Communal divisions existed in India despite the political unification.  In fact, they existed even before the Briti...
16 comments
Read more

The Ugly Duckling

Source: Acting Company A. A. Milne’s one-act play, The Ugly Duckling , acquired a classical status because of the hearty humour used to present a profound theme. The King and the Queen are worried because their daughter Camilla is too ugly to get a suitor. In spite of all the devious strategies employed by the King and his Chancellor, the princess remained unmarried. Camilla was blessed with a unique beauty by her two godmothers but no one could see any beauty in her physical appearance. She has an exquisitely beautiful character. What use is character? The King asks. The play is an answer to that question. Character plays the most crucial role in our moral science books and traditional rhetoric, religious scriptures and homilies. When it comes to practical life, we look for other things such as wealth, social rank, physical looks, and so on. As the King says in this play, “If a girl is beautiful, it is easy to assume that she has, tucked away inside her, an equally beauti...
31 comments
Read more

Helpless Gods

Illustration by Gemini Six decades ago, Kerala’s beloved poet Vayalar Ramavarma sang about gods that don’t open their eyes, don’t know joy or sorrow, but are mere clay idols. The movie that carried the song was a hit in Kerala in the late 1960s. I was only seven when the movie was released. The impact of the song, like many others composed by the same poet, sank into me a little later as I grew up. Our gods are quite useless; they are little more than narcissists who demand fresh and fragrant flowers only to fling them when they wither. Six decades after Kerala’s poet questioned the potency of gods, the Chief Justice of India had a shoe flung at him by a lawyer for the same thing: questioning the worth of gods. The lawyer was demanding the replacement of a damaged idol of god Vishnu and the Chief Justice wondered why gods couldn’t take care of themselves since they are omnipotent. The lawyer flung his shoe at the Chief Justice to prove his devotion to a god. From Vayalar of 196...
10 comments
Read more

Our gods must have died laughing

A friend forwarded a video clip this morning. It is an extract from a speech that celebrated Malayalam movie actor Sreenivasan delivered years ago. In the year 1984, Sreenivasan decided to marry the woman he was in love with. But his career in movies had just started and so he hadn’t made much money. Knowing his financial condition, another actor, Innocent, gave him Rs 400. Innocent wasn’t doing well either in the profession. “Alice’s bangle,” Innocent said. He had pawned or sold his wife’s bangle to get that amount for his friend. Then Sreenivasan went to Mammootty, who eventually became Malayalam’s superstar, to request for help. Mammootty gave him Rs 2000. Citing the goodness of the two men, Sreenivasan said that the wedding necklace ( mangalsutra ) he put ceremoniously around the neck of his Hindu wife was funded by a Christian (Innocent) and a Muslim (Mammootty). “What does religion matter?” Sreenivasan asks in the video. “You either refuse to believe in any or believe in a...
11 comments
Read more