Skip to main content

We: The Losers

 


Hamlet was a loser and a hero. Faced with a shocking evil – the murder of his father by father’s own brother who marries the victim’s wife even before the mourning is over – Hamlet wavers between violent vindictiveness and philosophical inaction. He can raise a question like “To be or not to be?” and contemplate on it endlessly when the wretched life around him demands prompt and stern action. This young man who is insistent on proving his uncle’s guilt indubitably before wreaking vengeance can be impulsive too. He can draw his sword and drive it straight into the man hiding behind a screen without even bothering to find out the man’s identity and purpose of hiding. At one moment he can address his beloved Ophelia as a fair nymph and at the next he can hurl insulting questions on to her face: “Are you honest?” “Are you fair?”

Is Hamlet a real hero? He does not possess qualities that belong to people whom history venerates as heroes. Yet Hamlet has continued to enchant audiences for centuries. Why?

Geniuses like Shakespeare present Hamlet to us in such a way that we are fascinated. We are fascinated by his failures. His failures are our own potential failures. Hamlet and other such characters (Jude the Obscure or Madame Bovary or Anna Karenina) hold up a mirror – nay, a lens – to ourselves. We see our frailties in that mirror or through that lens. We are all losers in many ways. Our flaws and frailties are what Hamlet lives on the stage. Helplessly oftentimes. Is he a born loser? Is there a “tragic flaw” embedded in his DNA so that he cannot but fail?

Aren’t all of us similar to Hamlet one way or the other with our own flaws? Aren’t we failing again and again? It may not be a wicked uncle or a treacherous mother that jabs their boots into the ribs of our flaccid moral sense. It may be a corrupt government. It may be an exploitative system. It may be a neighbourhood thug. We keep sponging up the insults and humiliations and injustices. Since these are not usually directed specifically at us but at a whole society or community or the nation itself, it is easy for us to ignore them. But they are there. Always. And we are the losers because of that. Sometimes our losses may be more personal too.

Even if we don’t have the talent of a Sophocles or Shakespeare, we can tell the stories of our loss and error. We will redeem ourselves that way from the insult of an existence in a system that dehumanises us. More than that, if we learn to see other people as the great losers whose stories have not been discovered by a Shakespeare yet, they too will become heroes instead of ordinary losers. Losers are potential heroes too.

PS. This post is a part of Blogchatter Half Marathon.

Comments

  1. Of course we are losers in the present scenario at least ! And I agree, we make characters like Hamlet or the Indian Devdas memorable because we see a reflection of our own shelves in them.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yet there could be more winners even in India if only our leaders cared.

      Delete
  2. Hari OM
    Well said... similar discussion could be had in the UK, if not as tragic as is occurring in India. Perhaps ours is closer to the parody that is a Midsummer Nights Mare..errrr. Dream.... and we all hope that we are going to wake up from it.... YAM xx

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Midsummer nightmare is what's going on even in India.

      Delete
  3. As always, a brilliant post.
    The tragic reality is that even when we identify the flaws in characters and others, training the same lens on ourselves happens very rarely. And even less collectively--as a society.
    Although literary geniuses portrayed human flaws in plays/stories to act as a mirror, yet (unlike the reaction to the play Hamlet put up for his mother and uncle) the audience fails to see their own reflection!
    Perhaps, that is why we fail to find the courage to act on time and instead, like Hamlet, continue to justify our inactions through rhetoric and poetry.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 🙏
      You were missed in the last week.

      And this observation about Hamlet's play (within the play) is really charming.

      Delete
  4. Since the world worships winners only and in the case of most of the winners, success (win) goes to your head in such a way that they can never appreciate losers. Losers, therefore, become heroes of losers only. Albeit, it happens that some losers become heroes for others long after they cease to exist in the world. Before signing off, let me assert that I endorse the thought presented through this post because I worship virtues and not successes. Broken dreams don't lose their significance just because of getting broken. They deserve to be cherished in the hearts of the dreamers (at least).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You console a lot of people, especially the losers like me. :)

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ayodhya: Kingdom of Sorrows

T he Sarayu carried more tears than water. Ayodhya was a sad kingdom. Dasaratha was a good king. He upheld dharma – justice and morality – as best as he could. The citizens were apparently happy. Then, one day, it all changed. One person is enough to change the destiny of a whole kingdom. Who was that one person? Some say it was Kaikeyi, one of the three official wives of Dasaratha. Some others say it was Manthara, Kaikeyi’s chief maid. Manthara was a hunchback. She was the caretaker of Kaikeyi right from the latter’s childhood; foster mother, so to say, because Kaikeyi had no mother. The absence of maternal influence can distort a girl child’s personality. With a foster mother like Manthara, the distortion can be really bad. Manthara was cunning, selfish, and morally ambiguous. A severe physical deformity can make one worse than all that. Manthara was as devious and manipulative as a woman could be in a men’s world. Add to that all the jealousy and ambition that insecure peo...

Lucifer and some reflections

Let me start with a disclaimer: this is not a review of the Malayalam movie, Lucifer . These are some thoughts that came to my mind as I watched the movie today. However, just to give an idea about the movie: it’s a good entertainer with an engaging plot, Bollywood style settings, superman type violence in which the hero decimates the villains with pomp and show, and a spicy dance that is neatly tucked into the terribly orgasmic climax of the plot. The theme is highly relevant and that is what engaged me more. The role of certain mafia gangs in political governance is a theme that deserves to be examined in a good movie. In the movie, the mafia-politician nexus is busted and, like in our great myths, virtue triumphs over vice. Such a triumph is an artistic requirement. Real life, however, follows the principle of entropy: chaos flourishes with vengeance. Lucifer is the real winner in real life. The title of the movie as well as a final dialogue from the eponymous hero sugg...

Abdullah’s Religion

O Abdulla Renowned Malayalam movie actor Mohanlal recently offered special prayers for Mammootty, another equally renowned actor of Kerala. The ritual was performed at Sabarimala temple, one of the supreme Hindu pilgrimage centres in Kerala. No one in Kerala found anything wrong in Mohanlal, a Hindu, praying for Mammootty, a Muslim, to a Hindu deity. Malayalis were concerned about Mammootty’s wellbeing and were relieved to know that the actor wasn’t suffering from anything as serious as it appeared. Except O Abdulla. Who is this Abdulla? I had never heard of him until he created an unsavoury controversy about a Hindu praying for a Muslim. This man’s Facebook profile describes him as: “Former Professor Islahiaya, Media Critic, Ex-Interpreter of Indian Ambassador, Founder Member MADHYAMAM.” He has 108K followers on FB. As I was reading Malayalam weekly this morning, I came to know that this Abdulla is a former member of Jamaat-e-Islami Hind Kerala , a fundamentalist organisation. ...

Empuraan and Ramayana

Maggie and I will be watching the Malayalam movie Empuraan tomorrow. The tickets are booked. The movie has created a lot of controversy in Kerala and the director has decided to impose no less than 17 censors on it himself. I want to watch it before the jingoistic scissors find its way to the movie. It is surprising that the people of Kerala took such exception to this movie when the same people had no problem with the utterly malicious and mendacious movie The Kerala Story (2023). [My post on that movie, which I didn’t watch, is here .] Empuraan is based partly on the Gujarat riots of 2002. The riots were real and the BJP’s role in it (Mr Modi’s, in fact) is well-known. So, Empuraan isn’t giving the audience any falsehood as The Kerala Story did. Moreover, The Kerala Story maligned the people of Kerala while Empuraan is about something that happened in the faraway Gujarat quite long ago. Why are the people of Kerala then upset with Empuraan ? Because it tells the truth, M...

Empuraan – Review

Revenge is an ancient theme in human narratives. Give a moral rationale for the revenge and make the antagonist look monstrously evil, then you have the material for a good work of art. Add to that some spices from contemporary politics and the recipe is quite right for a hit movie. This is what you get in the Malayalam movie, Empuraan , which is running full houses now despite the trenchant opposition to it from the emergent Hindutva forces in the state. First of all, I fail to understand why so much brouhaha was hollered by the Hindutvans [let me coin that word for sheer convenience] who managed to get some 3 minutes censored from the 3-hour movie. The movie doesn’t make any explicit mention of any of the existing Hindutva political parties or other organisations. On the other hand, Allahu Akbar is shouted menacingly by Islamic terrorists, albeit towards the end. True, the movie begins with an implicit reference to what happened in Gujarat in 2002 after the Godhra train burnin...