Skip to main content

History and Fiction

Book Review

Title: Conversations with Aurangzeb

Author: Charu Nivedita

Translated from Tamil by Nandini Krishnan

Publisher: HarperCollins India, 2023

Pages: 335

History claims to give us truths and fiction really gives us glimpses into truths. Tamil novelist Charu Nivedita’s Conversations with Aurangzeb is in fact history masquerading as a novel. It is fiction inasmuch as Aurangzeb makes an apparition through a medium to the narrator who is a writer doing some research for his next novel. But it is not a novel because there is nothing that can be called a plot. It’s all conversation between the narrator and the spirit of the Mughal emperor. Occasionally a few other characters make their appearances, but they don’t add anything to the plot.

How much can we trust history? This is the question that the writer explores in this novel. It is a cliché that history is written by the winners. It gets rewritten when new winners emerge. For example, India’s history is being rewritten by the present regime and the old heroes such as Jawaharlal Nehru and Mahatma Gandhi are often projected as villains in the new history.

Ashoka is a hero in this new history too. But was he really heroic? Aurangzeb tells the narrator: “… the greatest villain in the history of Hindustan was Emperor Ashoka.” No other ruler of Hindustan has done as much harm to ‘The Sanatan Marg’ as did Ashoka, according to this novel’s protagonist. Ashoka outdid even the Dravida movement, says Aurangzeb, in hating and sidelining the Brahmins. Ashoka was a great salesman, of himself. His edicts and pillars and other inscriptions were all self-propaganda. He made sure that his reputation lasted for centuries. Ashoka knew how to advertise himself better than India’s present ruler.

Aurangzeb proves to the narrator that he was far less harmful to the Hindus than the other Mughal emperors. Akbar who is often portrayed as a very tolerant emperor was in fact driven by lust. He wanted to marry many Rajput beauties; so an amicable relationship was required with that community. His tolerance was motivated by that, says Aurangzeb. The Mughal emperors were all ruthless people as most rulers are. A “good and just ruler” is “an oxymoron.” Is there even one single Mughal emperor who did not kill his own brothers, and even father in some cases, for the sake of ascending the throne?

Such brutality and ruthlessness notwithstanding, the Mughals were not as vile as some of the characters in the Mahabharata, says Aurangzeb. “When I read of that war,” he says, “my cruellest deeds appear as nothing before it.” Even the gods are so deceptive in that war. So much adharma is perpetrated for the sake of bringing dharma!

The novel brings in contemporary politics too occasionally, often satirically. Just one example. India does not value its writers these days. But Chile does very much. Aurangzeb and the narrator visit Chile to see how writers are respected and treasured in that country. But Aurangzeb is quite displeased with the prostitution practised there. So he performs a miracle of sorts. He can do that since he is a spirit. But the credit for that goes to Narendra Modi. When the Chilean president makes certain amendments in the country’s rules and regulations because of what Aurangzeb did, Narendra Modi appreciates it and thanks the president. Many Indians soon claim that the changes in Chile are brought about “by Modi’s efforts and celebrate their dear leader for yet another political feat.”

This book is quite different from all the books that we are familiar with. You can’t classify it as fiction. It is not history either. It is both. Yet it is not historical fiction in the traditional sense. There is lot of humour in it. Irony too. Paradoxes too. It makes us question a lot of our notions about history and truth. That, I believe, is the writer’s purpose. And he succeeds eminently in that.

PS. A day after I posted the above review, I remember I missed something important. The biggest propaganda against Aurangzeb in today's India is that he was a destroyer of Hindu temples. This novel shows Aurangzeb as far more moral and tolerant than many other Mughals. Destruction of certain places of worships was a common strategy in those days. Many rulers resorted to that just to show people that they were more powerful than certain gods. It was a political ploy and little more. Remember the number of Christian churches attacked and destroyed in North India soon after Narendra Modi came to power in 2014? Mr Modi has even permitted some people to worship him as a god in a Gujarat temple! Aurangzeb didn't go to that extent. 

Comments

  1. It sounds different. It sounds like it made you think.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Replies
    1. Yes. The author has attached a rather detailed bibliography at the end. He did quite some research before writing this.

      Delete
  3. The question that I always ask myself is " Is history that we learn and teach true?" guess we can only find it out by inventing the time machine. But the authors take and observation that you have shared here is intriguing, I will be reading this book in the near future. and yes Indian's do not give enough support to Indian writers but this applies to every art and sports form, hope and wish to see a difference in the future. as long as teachers like to exist it will come true. Have a good one, take care.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. History is not what it seems to be, I think. It's always colored by the writer's perspectives.

      Delete
  4. It's also a book that can trigger someone. What do you think about that?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If you mean bigots and such people whose sentiments are as sensitive as toilet seats, well, such people don't read anything worthwhile and so there's no problem. If such people fo read some good literature, the world will be a much happier place.

      Delete
  5. I read historical fiction quite often.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Double benefits: peeps into history and also relish literature.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Adventures of Toto as a comic strip

  'The Adventures of Toto' is an amusing story by Ruskin Bond. It is prescribed as a lesson in CBSE's English course for class 9. Maggie asked her students to do a project on some of the lessons and Femi George's work is what I would like to present here. Femi converted the story into a beautiful comic strip. Her work will speak for itself and let me present it below.  Femi George Student of Carmel Public School, Vazhakulam, Kerala Similar post: The Little Girl

The Little Girl

The Little Girl is a short story by Katherine Mansfield given in the class 9 English course of NCERT. Maggie gave an assignment to her students based on the story and one of her students, Athena Baby Sabu, presented a brilliant job. She converted the story into a delightful comic strip. Mansfield tells the story of Kezia who is the eponymous little girl. Kezia is scared of her father who wields a lot of control on the entire family. She is punished severely for an unwitting mistake which makes her even more scared of her father. Her grandmother is fond of her and is her emotional succour. The grandmother is away from home one day with Kezia's mother who is hospitalised. Kezia gets her usual nightmare and is terrified. There is no one at home to console her except her father from whom she does not expect any consolation. But the father rises to the occasion and lets the little girl sleep beside him that night. She rests her head on her father's chest and can feel his heart...

I’m Alive

Illustration by Copilot Designer How do you prove to anyone that you’re alive? Go and stand in front of the person and declare, “I’m Tom, Shyam or Hari”? No, that won’t work in India. Let me share my personal experience. It’s as absurd as the plight of Kafka’s protagonist in The Castle. A land surveyor is summoned for duty, only to be told that the mere fact a land surveyor was summoned does not prove he is that land surveyor though he has the appointment letter with him. I received a mail from the Life Insurance Corporation of India [LIC] that I should prove my existence in order to continue receiving my annuity on the sum I had invested with them five years ago. They’re only paying the interest on the sum I have given them. They’re not doing me any charity. Yet they want me to prove to them that I am still alive in order to continue getting the annual amount they are obligated to pay me. This is India. LIC is a government undertaking. If I don’t follow their injunction, I wil...

Hindutva’s Contradictions

The book I’m reading now is Whose Rama? [in Malayalam] by Sanskrit scholar and professor T S Syamkumar. I had mentioned this book in an earlier post . The basic premise of the book, as I understand from the initial pages, is that Hindutva is a Brahminical ideology that keeps the lower caste people outside its terrain. Non-Aryans are portrayed as monsters in ancient Hindu literature. The Shudras, the lowest caste, and the casteless others, are not even granted the status of humans.  Whose Rama? The August issue of The Caravan carries an article related to the inhuman treatment that the Brahmins of Etawah in Uttar Pradesh meted out to a Yadav “preacher” in the last week of June 2025. “Yadavs are traditionally ranked as a Shudra community,” says the article. They are not supposed to recite the holy texts. Mukut Mani Singh Yadav was reciting verses from the Bhagavad Gita. That was his crime. The Brahmins of the locality got the man’s head tonsured, forced him to rub his nose at t...

Independence from Dictators too

Kerala Governor Rajendra Arlekar asked the state to observe ‘Partition Horror Day’ on 14 Aug instead of celebrating the country’s Independence. His organisation, the RSS, as well as its ideological sibling the Hindu Mahasabha, had explicitly directed its members not to celebrate the Independence on 14-15 Aug 1947. From Bombay Chronicle, 9 Aug 1947 Dominique Lapierre and Larry Collins gave us a graphic description of what the RSS did on 15 Aug 1947, in their classic book Freedom at Midnight . When the rest of India celebrated its new Independence, the RSS hoisted its own flag, “an orange triangle, emblazoned upon which was the symbol that, in a slightly modified form, had terrorized Europe for a decade, the swastika.” About 500 RSS men stood saluting the swastika on 15 Aug 1947 in Poona. Lapierre and Collins describe the RSS as a “para-fascist movement” whose members “saw themselves as the heirs to those ancient Aryans.” Rajendra Arlekar is an RSS man. He has been doing whate...