Skip to main content

Kabir the Guru – 2


Read Part 1 of this here.

Kabir lived in the 15th century. But his poems and songs are still valued. Being illiterate, he didn’t write them. They were passed on orally until they were collected by certain enthusiasts into books. Vipul Rikhi’s book, Drunk on Love: The Life, Vision and Songs of Kabir, not only brings the songs and poems together in one volume but also seeks to impart the very spirit of Kabir to the reader.

Kabir is not just a name, the book informs us somewhere in the beginning. Kabir is a tradition. He is a legend, a philosophy, poetry and music. I would add that Kabir was a mystic. Most of his songs have something to do with spirituality. They strive to convey the deep meaning of reality. They also question the ordinary person’s practice of religion. They criticise the religious leaders such as pandits and mullahs.

Though a Muslim, Kabir was immensely taken up by Ram, the Hindu god, for reasons known only to him perhaps. Most of the songs are about the greatness of Rama. Kabir’s Rama is like Mahatma Gandhi’s Rama: a metaphysical idea rather than the human Rama of Valmiki. Kabir’s Rama, like Gandhi’s again, could be Rahim or any other god.

“Mecca is Varanasi again / And Ram has become Rahim.” Kabir sings. Devotees fail to see Rama within their own hearts. That’s the problem. Unable to see Rama within their hearts, devotees go seeking him outside – in temples or other places. This is the mistake. When you see Rama within you, all reality becomes sacred. You will see Rama in all reality. Incapable of such perception, “Hindus claim Ram is theirs / Muslims lay claim to Rehman / They fight and kill each other / Neither knows the essence.” Kabir laments.

He sang that in the 15th century. We haven’t come much farther from that, have we? Kabir would say we are like the crowd in the market. They don’t understand that the stone lying in the mud is diamond. They trample over it. Then comes a jeweller. He understands the value of the stone and picks it up. He is enriched and the stone gets its right place. God is like that stone. Trampled upon by ignorant crowds.

Kabir’s God chides the devotee: “Where are you searching for me, O man? / I’m here, right next to you. / Neither in the holy place, nor in the idol / Nor am I in solitary habitation / Neither in the temple nor in the mosque / Nor am I in Mecca or Mount Kailash.”

Kabir can be blunt in his criticism of the ascetics. “O yogi, you dyed your robe ochre / But did not transform your mind / You went to the forest / You lit the holy fire / You smeared yourself with ash / Now you look like an ass!” [Does anyone come to your mind?]

Kabir is much needed in our time, especially in India. Vipul Rikhi has done a good job by presenting Kabir in this book. All of Kabir’s best songs and couplets are available in this slim volume of less than 300 pages. The last section gives the transliteration of the original Hindi versions. 

A page from the book


Comments

  1. There are traditions that go back centuries where writing wasn't widespread, so singing was the way to go. Glad that these have not been lost to time.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. These songs are provocative as well as lyrical. Maybe, that's why they were/are so popular.

      Delete
  2. Replies
    1. The book will be a treasure for anyone who loves Kabir.

      Delete
  3. Very nice. Does the book have the original lines of Kabir as well?

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ayodhya: Kingdom of Sorrows

T he Sarayu carried more tears than water. Ayodhya was a sad kingdom. Dasaratha was a good king. He upheld dharma – justice and morality – as best as he could. The citizens were apparently happy. Then, one day, it all changed. One person is enough to change the destiny of a whole kingdom. Who was that one person? Some say it was Kaikeyi, one of the three official wives of Dasaratha. Some others say it was Manthara, Kaikeyi’s chief maid. Manthara was a hunchback. She was the caretaker of Kaikeyi right from the latter’s childhood; foster mother, so to say, because Kaikeyi had no mother. The absence of maternal influence can distort a girl child’s personality. With a foster mother like Manthara, the distortion can be really bad. Manthara was cunning, selfish, and morally ambiguous. A severe physical deformity can make one worse than all that. Manthara was as devious and manipulative as a woman could be in a men’s world. Add to that all the jealousy and ambition that insecure peo...

Abdullah’s Religion

O Abdulla Renowned Malayalam movie actor Mohanlal recently offered special prayers for Mammootty, another equally renowned actor of Kerala. The ritual was performed at Sabarimala temple, one of the supreme Hindu pilgrimage centres in Kerala. No one in Kerala found anything wrong in Mohanlal, a Hindu, praying for Mammootty, a Muslim, to a Hindu deity. Malayalis were concerned about Mammootty’s wellbeing and were relieved to know that the actor wasn’t suffering from anything as serious as it appeared. Except O Abdulla. Who is this Abdulla? I had never heard of him until he created an unsavoury controversy about a Hindu praying for a Muslim. This man’s Facebook profile describes him as: “Former Professor Islahiaya, Media Critic, Ex-Interpreter of Indian Ambassador, Founder Member MADHYAMAM.” He has 108K followers on FB. As I was reading Malayalam weekly this morning, I came to know that this Abdulla is a former member of Jamaat-e-Islami Hind Kerala , a fundamentalist organisation. ...

Lucifer and some reflections

Let me start with a disclaimer: this is not a review of the Malayalam movie, Lucifer . These are some thoughts that came to my mind as I watched the movie today. However, just to give an idea about the movie: it’s a good entertainer with an engaging plot, Bollywood style settings, superman type violence in which the hero decimates the villains with pomp and show, and a spicy dance that is neatly tucked into the terribly orgasmic climax of the plot. The theme is highly relevant and that is what engaged me more. The role of certain mafia gangs in political governance is a theme that deserves to be examined in a good movie. In the movie, the mafia-politician nexus is busted and, like in our great myths, virtue triumphs over vice. Such a triumph is an artistic requirement. Real life, however, follows the principle of entropy: chaos flourishes with vengeance. Lucifer is the real winner in real life. The title of the movie as well as a final dialogue from the eponymous hero sugg...

Empuraan and Ramayana

Maggie and I will be watching the Malayalam movie Empuraan tomorrow. The tickets are booked. The movie has created a lot of controversy in Kerala and the director has decided to impose no less than 17 censors on it himself. I want to watch it before the jingoistic scissors find its way to the movie. It is surprising that the people of Kerala took such exception to this movie when the same people had no problem with the utterly malicious and mendacious movie The Kerala Story (2023). [My post on that movie, which I didn’t watch, is here .] Empuraan is based partly on the Gujarat riots of 2002. The riots were real and the BJP’s role in it (Mr Modi’s, in fact) is well-known. So, Empuraan isn’t giving the audience any falsehood as The Kerala Story did. Moreover, The Kerala Story maligned the people of Kerala while Empuraan is about something that happened in the faraway Gujarat quite long ago. Why are the people of Kerala then upset with Empuraan ? Because it tells the truth, M...

Empuraan – Review

Revenge is an ancient theme in human narratives. Give a moral rationale for the revenge and make the antagonist look monstrously evil, then you have the material for a good work of art. Add to that some spices from contemporary politics and the recipe is quite right for a hit movie. This is what you get in the Malayalam movie, Empuraan , which is running full houses now despite the trenchant opposition to it from the emergent Hindutva forces in the state. First of all, I fail to understand why so much brouhaha was hollered by the Hindutvans [let me coin that word for sheer convenience] who managed to get some 3 minutes censored from the 3-hour movie. The movie doesn’t make any explicit mention of any of the existing Hindutva political parties or other organisations. On the other hand, Allahu Akbar is shouted menacingly by Islamic terrorists, albeit towards the end. True, the movie begins with an implicit reference to what happened in Gujarat in 2002 after the Godhra train burnin...