Skip to main content

Economics Simplified




Ram wants to start a business.  He needs ₹1 million.  Desh Bank is a new bank where Shyam has deposited ₹1 million on completion of a recent contract of his. The bank is ready to give Ram a loan and transfers ₹1 million to his account.  Ram gives the contract for his new building for his proposed business to Shyam who demands ₹1 million for the job.  Ram gives Shyam a cheque for ₹1 million.  Shyam deposits the cheque in the bank.  How much money does Shyam have in his account now?  Answer: ₹2 million.  How much money is there actually in the bank?  Answer: ₹1 million.

Som similarly gets a loan of ₹1 million from Desh Bank.  He too employs Shyam as his contractor and gives a cheque for ₹1 million to Shyam who deposits it in the bank.  There’s now ₹3 million in Shyam’s account although the actual amount in the bank remains the same original ₹1 million.

Now Shyam wants to take out his ₹3 million to start a business of his own.  What happens?

Desh Bank seeks government assistance.  The government agrees to help so that the bank won’t collapse.  Where does the government get the money from?  It can raise the price of petrol and diesel by a few paise and a few millions will be materialised within minutes. 

This is just a parable adapted from Yuval Noah Harari’s book, A Brief History of Humankind.  Replace the names of the bank and the persons with some real names, make it a little more complex with more people and bigger amounts, and you will understand the way our economy works.



Comments

  1. Your blog has a new look. Great.
    That is unfortunately, the story of human kind. You pay for someone else's sin, someone who is much much richer than you.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ah, you put it so precisely. Great comment. Great understanding. I'm obliged for such understanding. At least you won't shoot me. :)

      Delete
  2. I have been reading this book, sapiens. It has broken my several beliefs and at the same time has evoked a certain helplessness in the entire system of imagined realities that we hold dear to us. The concept of money is itself the biggest imagined reality that people believe in. Stock exchange, banks, limited liability companies , religion, feminism, nationalism, capitalism , gods and gossips come along and hold our collective imagination.

    But for what? Where is it leading us to? If you go back and find the barter system stupid , then is the currency exchange system also a stupidity or an evolution of the imagined realitities? Are we moving towards a converging point, towards a unity with such progressive imaginations? What would be the conclusion? I am yet to finish the book but nonetheless the book raises more of such questions and inevitably makes me embrace the cognitive dissonance.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The book raises many radical questions. As long as most human beings choose to wallow in mediocrity, the civilisation will continue with limited liability systems.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ayodhya: Kingdom of Sorrows

T he Sarayu carried more tears than water. Ayodhya was a sad kingdom. Dasaratha was a good king. He upheld dharma – justice and morality – as best as he could. The citizens were apparently happy. Then, one day, it all changed. One person is enough to change the destiny of a whole kingdom. Who was that one person? Some say it was Kaikeyi, one of the three official wives of Dasaratha. Some others say it was Manthara, Kaikeyi’s chief maid. Manthara was a hunchback. She was the caretaker of Kaikeyi right from the latter’s childhood; foster mother, so to say, because Kaikeyi had no mother. The absence of maternal influence can distort a girl child’s personality. With a foster mother like Manthara, the distortion can be really bad. Manthara was cunning, selfish, and morally ambiguous. A severe physical deformity can make one worse than all that. Manthara was as devious and manipulative as a woman could be in a men’s world. Add to that all the jealousy and ambition that insecure peo...

Abdullah’s Religion

O Abdulla Renowned Malayalam movie actor Mohanlal recently offered special prayers for Mammootty, another equally renowned actor of Kerala. The ritual was performed at Sabarimala temple, one of the supreme Hindu pilgrimage centres in Kerala. No one in Kerala found anything wrong in Mohanlal, a Hindu, praying for Mammootty, a Muslim, to a Hindu deity. Malayalis were concerned about Mammootty’s wellbeing and were relieved to know that the actor wasn’t suffering from anything as serious as it appeared. Except O Abdulla. Who is this Abdulla? I had never heard of him until he created an unsavoury controversy about a Hindu praying for a Muslim. This man’s Facebook profile describes him as: “Former Professor Islahiaya, Media Critic, Ex-Interpreter of Indian Ambassador, Founder Member MADHYAMAM.” He has 108K followers on FB. As I was reading Malayalam weekly this morning, I came to know that this Abdulla is a former member of Jamaat-e-Islami Hind Kerala , a fundamentalist organisation. ...

Lucifer and some reflections

Let me start with a disclaimer: this is not a review of the Malayalam movie, Lucifer . These are some thoughts that came to my mind as I watched the movie today. However, just to give an idea about the movie: it’s a good entertainer with an engaging plot, Bollywood style settings, superman type violence in which the hero decimates the villains with pomp and show, and a spicy dance that is neatly tucked into the terribly orgasmic climax of the plot. The theme is highly relevant and that is what engaged me more. The role of certain mafia gangs in political governance is a theme that deserves to be examined in a good movie. In the movie, the mafia-politician nexus is busted and, like in our great myths, virtue triumphs over vice. Such a triumph is an artistic requirement. Real life, however, follows the principle of entropy: chaos flourishes with vengeance. Lucifer is the real winner in real life. The title of the movie as well as a final dialogue from the eponymous hero sugg...

Empuraan and Ramayana

Maggie and I will be watching the Malayalam movie Empuraan tomorrow. The tickets are booked. The movie has created a lot of controversy in Kerala and the director has decided to impose no less than 17 censors on it himself. I want to watch it before the jingoistic scissors find its way to the movie. It is surprising that the people of Kerala took such exception to this movie when the same people had no problem with the utterly malicious and mendacious movie The Kerala Story (2023). [My post on that movie, which I didn’t watch, is here .] Empuraan is based partly on the Gujarat riots of 2002. The riots were real and the BJP’s role in it (Mr Modi’s, in fact) is well-known. So, Empuraan isn’t giving the audience any falsehood as The Kerala Story did. Moreover, The Kerala Story maligned the people of Kerala while Empuraan is about something that happened in the faraway Gujarat quite long ago. Why are the people of Kerala then upset with Empuraan ? Because it tells the truth, M...

Empuraan – Review

Revenge is an ancient theme in human narratives. Give a moral rationale for the revenge and make the antagonist look monstrously evil, then you have the material for a good work of art. Add to that some spices from contemporary politics and the recipe is quite right for a hit movie. This is what you get in the Malayalam movie, Empuraan , which is running full houses now despite the trenchant opposition to it from the emergent Hindutva forces in the state. First of all, I fail to understand why so much brouhaha was hollered by the Hindutvans [let me coin that word for sheer convenience] who managed to get some 3 minutes censored from the 3-hour movie. The movie doesn’t make any explicit mention of any of the existing Hindutva political parties or other organisations. On the other hand, Allahu Akbar is shouted menacingly by Islamic terrorists, albeit towards the end. True, the movie begins with an implicit reference to what happened in Gujarat in 2002 after the Godhra train burnin...