Skip to main content

Murder of Dissent




The murder of journalist and activist Gauri Lankesh is yet another tremor that has shaken the pillars of democracy in India.  Two years ago, the scholarly rationalist M M Kalburgi was killed under similar circumstances.  Referring to that murder, Gauri Lankesh later said that “we are living in such times when Modi Bhakts and the Hindutva brigade welcome the killings and celebrate the deaths (as in the case of U.R. Ananthamurthy) of those who oppose their ideology”.  Today the social media is replete with celebrations of Lankesh’s murder.  Anyone who goes through the gloating comments will understand who killed the journalist and why.

Gauri Lankesh dreamt of an egalitarian society in India.  That was her crime.  The right wing in the country has always been opposed to anyone who questioned what it projected as the nation’s ancient culture and tradition.  People like Gauri Lankesh decoded what passed off as “culture and tradition” and questioned its very foundations.  She was a serious threat to the right wing.

By eliminating people like Gauri Lankesh, the message that is conveyed in unequivocal terms is: Don’t dare to question the authority.  A monolithic authority founded ostensibly on an equally monolithic national culture is what is emerging as the most serious threat to India’s pluralist democracy.  This brutal authority has blatantly displayed its fangs in various shapes and forms many times.  Those who dared to question it have been subjected to various kinds of assaults like raids in their offices and homes, humiliating trolls in social networks, and even dastardly murders. 

Gauri Lankesh was openly opposed to what the right wing stood for.  She was opposed to the caste system, the oppression of the Dalits and other poor sections of the society, the creation of a false notion of a homogeneous national culture, and so on.  So the right wing called her a “Hindu hater.” 

Thousands of people have come out in protest against the murder of this activist-journalist.  The protests are a healthy sign that the whole of the country has not been caught in the tentacles of bigotry and hatred.  The gentle lights of reason and dissent have not been doused yet.  Let the lights burn brighter dispelling the darkness of bigotry and hatred. 



Comments

  1. The sacrifice of Gauri Lankesh is not going to go in vain Sir. Poet Benjamin Moloise was executed by the pro-apartheid Botha government in South Africa on 18.10.1985 and within a few years, apartheid in South Africa met its death with Nelson Mandela's taking over the realm. Similar thing had happened decades ago in India when the British had to finally leave this land and pave the path of India's political freedom. Whatever is happening around is also bound to come to an end because change is the only permanent thing, everything else has a life-span which cannot continue till eternity. The present Indian premier and his 'army' is not able to realize that they can fool some people for all the time and all the people for some time but they can't fool all the people all the time.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The way people took to the streets in protest against the murder gives me hope too. Yes, no one can fool all the people all the time. Sweet words like Mann ki Baat won't hoodwink people for long. The govt has to belong to all the citizens, not just the bhakts.

      Delete
  2. This is really sad. She had helped society , by inspiring the naxalites to surrender and lead a peaceful life.

    ReplyDelete
  3. The trend is very disturbing! Gauri Lankesh was a respected, fearless journalist.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Good people are strong enemies when the system is wrong. That's why such people have to be eliminated. Let's hope the system will change.

      Delete
  4. This is incredibly sad and such cases are not limited only to India - in many countries, the "uncomfortable" people are a threat which ends up being removed one way or another.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. India was open to dissent until recently. As Nobel laureate Amartya Sen argued in his book, 'The Argumentative Indian,' Indians always loved debate and dissent. Atheism was also an integral part of the ancient Hinduism. But the situation has changed alarmingly.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ayodhya: Kingdom of Sorrows

T he Sarayu carried more tears than water. Ayodhya was a sad kingdom. Dasaratha was a good king. He upheld dharma – justice and morality – as best as he could. The citizens were apparently happy. Then, one day, it all changed. One person is enough to change the destiny of a whole kingdom. Who was that one person? Some say it was Kaikeyi, one of the three official wives of Dasaratha. Some others say it was Manthara, Kaikeyi’s chief maid. Manthara was a hunchback. She was the caretaker of Kaikeyi right from the latter’s childhood; foster mother, so to say, because Kaikeyi had no mother. The absence of maternal influence can distort a girl child’s personality. With a foster mother like Manthara, the distortion can be really bad. Manthara was cunning, selfish, and morally ambiguous. A severe physical deformity can make one worse than all that. Manthara was as devious and manipulative as a woman could be in a men’s world. Add to that all the jealousy and ambition that insecure peo...

Abdullah’s Religion

O Abdulla Renowned Malayalam movie actor Mohanlal recently offered special prayers for Mammootty, another equally renowned actor of Kerala. The ritual was performed at Sabarimala temple, one of the supreme Hindu pilgrimage centres in Kerala. No one in Kerala found anything wrong in Mohanlal, a Hindu, praying for Mammootty, a Muslim, to a Hindu deity. Malayalis were concerned about Mammootty’s wellbeing and were relieved to know that the actor wasn’t suffering from anything as serious as it appeared. Except O Abdulla. Who is this Abdulla? I had never heard of him until he created an unsavoury controversy about a Hindu praying for a Muslim. This man’s Facebook profile describes him as: “Former Professor Islahiaya, Media Critic, Ex-Interpreter of Indian Ambassador, Founder Member MADHYAMAM.” He has 108K followers on FB. As I was reading Malayalam weekly this morning, I came to know that this Abdulla is a former member of Jamaat-e-Islami Hind Kerala , a fundamentalist organisation. ...

Lucifer and some reflections

Let me start with a disclaimer: this is not a review of the Malayalam movie, Lucifer . These are some thoughts that came to my mind as I watched the movie today. However, just to give an idea about the movie: it’s a good entertainer with an engaging plot, Bollywood style settings, superman type violence in which the hero decimates the villains with pomp and show, and a spicy dance that is neatly tucked into the terribly orgasmic climax of the plot. The theme is highly relevant and that is what engaged me more. The role of certain mafia gangs in political governance is a theme that deserves to be examined in a good movie. In the movie, the mafia-politician nexus is busted and, like in our great myths, virtue triumphs over vice. Such a triumph is an artistic requirement. Real life, however, follows the principle of entropy: chaos flourishes with vengeance. Lucifer is the real winner in real life. The title of the movie as well as a final dialogue from the eponymous hero sugg...

Empuraan and Ramayana

Maggie and I will be watching the Malayalam movie Empuraan tomorrow. The tickets are booked. The movie has created a lot of controversy in Kerala and the director has decided to impose no less than 17 censors on it himself. I want to watch it before the jingoistic scissors find its way to the movie. It is surprising that the people of Kerala took such exception to this movie when the same people had no problem with the utterly malicious and mendacious movie The Kerala Story (2023). [My post on that movie, which I didn’t watch, is here .] Empuraan is based partly on the Gujarat riots of 2002. The riots were real and the BJP’s role in it (Mr Modi’s, in fact) is well-known. So, Empuraan isn’t giving the audience any falsehood as The Kerala Story did. Moreover, The Kerala Story maligned the people of Kerala while Empuraan is about something that happened in the faraway Gujarat quite long ago. Why are the people of Kerala then upset with Empuraan ? Because it tells the truth, M...

Empuraan – Review

Revenge is an ancient theme in human narratives. Give a moral rationale for the revenge and make the antagonist look monstrously evil, then you have the material for a good work of art. Add to that some spices from contemporary politics and the recipe is quite right for a hit movie. This is what you get in the Malayalam movie, Empuraan , which is running full houses now despite the trenchant opposition to it from the emergent Hindutva forces in the state. First of all, I fail to understand why so much brouhaha was hollered by the Hindutvans [let me coin that word for sheer convenience] who managed to get some 3 minutes censored from the 3-hour movie. The movie doesn’t make any explicit mention of any of the existing Hindutva political parties or other organisations. On the other hand, Allahu Akbar is shouted menacingly by Islamic terrorists, albeit towards the end. True, the movie begins with an implicit reference to what happened in Gujarat in 2002 after the Godhra train burnin...